Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM): Groundwater Risk Assessment Model for Wellfield Protection
A groundwater risk assessment was carried out for 30 potable water supply systems under a framework of protecting drinking water quality across South Australia. A semi-quantitative Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM) was developed based on a “multi-barrier” approach using likelihood of release,...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2013-09-01
|
Series: | Water |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/5/3/1419 |
id |
doaj-44f816f0f1ea42f6b66e797d6be1ac54 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-44f816f0f1ea42f6b66e797d6be1ac542020-11-25T01:25:08ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412013-09-01531419143910.3390/w5031419Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM): Groundwater Risk Assessment Model for Wellfield ProtectionNara SomaratneHajrudin ZulficGlyn AshmanHayley VialBrooke SwafferJacqueline FrizenschafA groundwater risk assessment was carried out for 30 potable water supply systems under a framework of protecting drinking water quality across South Australia. A semi-quantitative Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM) was developed based on a “multi-barrier” approach using likelihood of release, contaminant pathway and consequence equation. Groundwater vulnerability and well integrity have been incorporated to the pathway component of the risk equation. The land use of the study basins varies from protected water reserves to heavily stocked grazing lands. Based on the risk assessment, 15 systems were considered as low risk, four as medium and 11 systems as at high risk. The GRAM risk levels were comparable with indicator bacteria—total coliform—detection. Most high risk systems were the result of poor well construction and casing corrosion rather than the land use. We carried out risk management actions, including changes to well designs and well operational practices, design to increase time of residence and setting the production zone below identified low permeable zones to provide additional barriers to contaminants. The highlight of the risk management element is the well integrity testing using down hole geophysical methods and camera views of the casing condition.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/5/3/1419risk assessmentaquifer vulnerabilityrisk managementtown water supply |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nara Somaratne Hajrudin Zulfic Glyn Ashman Hayley Vial Brooke Swaffer Jacqueline Frizenschaf |
spellingShingle |
Nara Somaratne Hajrudin Zulfic Glyn Ashman Hayley Vial Brooke Swaffer Jacqueline Frizenschaf Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM): Groundwater Risk Assessment Model for Wellfield Protection Water risk assessment aquifer vulnerability risk management town water supply |
author_facet |
Nara Somaratne Hajrudin Zulfic Glyn Ashman Hayley Vial Brooke Swaffer Jacqueline Frizenschaf |
author_sort |
Nara Somaratne |
title |
Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM): Groundwater Risk Assessment Model for Wellfield Protection |
title_short |
Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM): Groundwater Risk Assessment Model for Wellfield Protection |
title_full |
Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM): Groundwater Risk Assessment Model for Wellfield Protection |
title_fullStr |
Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM): Groundwater Risk Assessment Model for Wellfield Protection |
title_full_unstemmed |
Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM): Groundwater Risk Assessment Model for Wellfield Protection |
title_sort |
groundwater risk assessment model (gram): groundwater risk assessment model for wellfield protection |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Water |
issn |
2073-4441 |
publishDate |
2013-09-01 |
description |
A groundwater risk assessment was carried out for 30 potable water supply systems under a framework of protecting drinking water quality across South Australia. A semi-quantitative Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM) was developed based on a “multi-barrier” approach using likelihood of release, contaminant pathway and consequence equation. Groundwater vulnerability and well integrity have been incorporated to the pathway component of the risk equation. The land use of the study basins varies from protected water reserves to heavily stocked grazing lands. Based on the risk assessment, 15 systems were considered as low risk, four as medium and 11 systems as at high risk. The GRAM risk levels were comparable with indicator bacteria—total coliform—detection. Most high risk systems were the result of poor well construction and casing corrosion rather than the land use. We carried out risk management actions, including changes to well designs and well operational practices, design to increase time of residence and setting the production zone below identified low permeable zones to provide additional barriers to contaminants. The highlight of the risk management element is the well integrity testing using down hole geophysical methods and camera views of the casing condition. |
topic |
risk assessment aquifer vulnerability risk management town water supply |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/5/3/1419 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT narasomaratne groundwaterriskassessmentmodelgramgroundwaterriskassessmentmodelforwellfieldprotection AT hajrudinzulfic groundwaterriskassessmentmodelgramgroundwaterriskassessmentmodelforwellfieldprotection AT glynashman groundwaterriskassessmentmodelgramgroundwaterriskassessmentmodelforwellfieldprotection AT hayleyvial groundwaterriskassessmentmodelgramgroundwaterriskassessmentmodelforwellfieldprotection AT brookeswaffer groundwaterriskassessmentmodelgramgroundwaterriskassessmentmodelforwellfieldprotection AT jacquelinefrizenschaf groundwaterriskassessmentmodelgramgroundwaterriskassessmentmodelforwellfieldprotection |
_version_ |
1725115046916259840 |