Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM): Groundwater Risk Assessment Model for Wellfield Protection

A groundwater risk assessment was carried out for 30 potable water supply systems under a framework of protecting drinking water quality across South Australia. A semi-quantitative Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM) was developed based on a “multi-barrier” approach using likelihood of release,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nara Somaratne, Hajrudin Zulfic, Glyn Ashman, Hayley Vial, Brooke Swaffer, Jacqueline Frizenschaf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2013-09-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/5/3/1419
id doaj-44f816f0f1ea42f6b66e797d6be1ac54
record_format Article
spelling doaj-44f816f0f1ea42f6b66e797d6be1ac542020-11-25T01:25:08ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412013-09-01531419143910.3390/w5031419Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM): Groundwater Risk Assessment Model for Wellfield ProtectionNara SomaratneHajrudin ZulficGlyn AshmanHayley VialBrooke SwafferJacqueline FrizenschafA groundwater risk assessment was carried out for 30 potable water supply systems under a framework of protecting drinking water quality across South Australia. A semi-quantitative Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM) was developed based on a “multi-barrier” approach using likelihood of release, contaminant pathway and consequence equation. Groundwater vulnerability and well integrity have been incorporated to the pathway component of the risk equation. The land use of the study basins varies from protected water reserves to heavily stocked grazing lands. Based on the risk assessment, 15 systems were considered as low risk, four as medium and 11 systems as at high risk. The GRAM risk levels were comparable with indicator bacteria—total coliform—detection. Most high risk systems were the result of poor well construction and casing corrosion rather than the land use. We carried out risk management actions, including changes to well designs and well operational practices, design to increase time of residence and setting the production zone below identified low permeable zones to provide additional barriers to contaminants. The highlight of the risk management element is the well integrity testing using down hole geophysical methods and camera views of the casing condition.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/5/3/1419risk assessmentaquifer vulnerabilityrisk managementtown water supply
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nara Somaratne
Hajrudin Zulfic
Glyn Ashman
Hayley Vial
Brooke Swaffer
Jacqueline Frizenschaf
spellingShingle Nara Somaratne
Hajrudin Zulfic
Glyn Ashman
Hayley Vial
Brooke Swaffer
Jacqueline Frizenschaf
Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM): Groundwater Risk Assessment Model for Wellfield Protection
Water
risk assessment
aquifer vulnerability
risk management
town water supply
author_facet Nara Somaratne
Hajrudin Zulfic
Glyn Ashman
Hayley Vial
Brooke Swaffer
Jacqueline Frizenschaf
author_sort Nara Somaratne
title Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM): Groundwater Risk Assessment Model for Wellfield Protection
title_short Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM): Groundwater Risk Assessment Model for Wellfield Protection
title_full Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM): Groundwater Risk Assessment Model for Wellfield Protection
title_fullStr Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM): Groundwater Risk Assessment Model for Wellfield Protection
title_full_unstemmed Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM): Groundwater Risk Assessment Model for Wellfield Protection
title_sort groundwater risk assessment model (gram): groundwater risk assessment model for wellfield protection
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2013-09-01
description A groundwater risk assessment was carried out for 30 potable water supply systems under a framework of protecting drinking water quality across South Australia. A semi-quantitative Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM) was developed based on a “multi-barrier” approach using likelihood of release, contaminant pathway and consequence equation. Groundwater vulnerability and well integrity have been incorporated to the pathway component of the risk equation. The land use of the study basins varies from protected water reserves to heavily stocked grazing lands. Based on the risk assessment, 15 systems were considered as low risk, four as medium and 11 systems as at high risk. The GRAM risk levels were comparable with indicator bacteria—total coliform—detection. Most high risk systems were the result of poor well construction and casing corrosion rather than the land use. We carried out risk management actions, including changes to well designs and well operational practices, design to increase time of residence and setting the production zone below identified low permeable zones to provide additional barriers to contaminants. The highlight of the risk management element is the well integrity testing using down hole geophysical methods and camera views of the casing condition.
topic risk assessment
aquifer vulnerability
risk management
town water supply
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/5/3/1419
work_keys_str_mv AT narasomaratne groundwaterriskassessmentmodelgramgroundwaterriskassessmentmodelforwellfieldprotection
AT hajrudinzulfic groundwaterriskassessmentmodelgramgroundwaterriskassessmentmodelforwellfieldprotection
AT glynashman groundwaterriskassessmentmodelgramgroundwaterriskassessmentmodelforwellfieldprotection
AT hayleyvial groundwaterriskassessmentmodelgramgroundwaterriskassessmentmodelforwellfieldprotection
AT brookeswaffer groundwaterriskassessmentmodelgramgroundwaterriskassessmentmodelforwellfieldprotection
AT jacquelinefrizenschaf groundwaterriskassessmentmodelgramgroundwaterriskassessmentmodelforwellfieldprotection
_version_ 1725115046916259840