Silvio Waisbord. “The communication manifesto”

The "communication manifesto" is a timely book that calls for more public scholarship in communication and media studies. It aims to develop ideas that further stimulate conversation about our contribution to society and, most importantly, action that strengthens “scholars’ engagement with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Silke Fürst
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Seismo Verlag 2020-07-01
Series:Studies in Communication Sciences
id doaj-44f3ddc40a214387bf4f0ae990bea047
record_format Article
spelling doaj-44f3ddc40a214387bf4f0ae990bea0472021-07-15T13:57:17ZdeuSeismo VerlagStudies in Communication Sciences1424-48962296-41502020-07-01201115118https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2020.01.010Silvio Waisbord. “The communication manifesto”Silke Fürst0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1978-4277 University of ZurichThe "communication manifesto" is a timely book that calls for more public scholarship in communication and media studies. It aims to develop ideas that further stimulate conversation about our contribution to society and, most importantly, action that strengthens “scholars’ engagement with publics beyond academia” (p. 9). This means not only to communicate and discuss scientific knowledge in and with various publics but also to do research with practical implications and learn from the public. The author, Silvio Waisbord, is a professor at the George Washington University and published many pertinent articles and books in the fields of journalism, media policy, participatory and democratic communication, populism, human rights, and health communication. Over the years, he has gained profound insights in the development and diversity of communication scholarship by working and lecturing across the world. With his book, Waisbord addresses a long-standing discussion in our discipline. Over the last decades, many researchers have criticized that communication research does not contribute sufficiently to public discourses on media and communication and thereby misses opportunities to contribute its knowledge and demonstrate its social relevance (see Altmeppen, 2012, pp. 37–38; Brantner & Huber, 2013, p. 250; Craig, 2008; Docherty, Morrison, & Tracey, 1993; Fengler & Eberwein, 2012; Ruß-Mohl, 2006, p. 203; Wartella, 1993). Most recently, this discussion has gained renewed momentum.
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Silke Fürst
spellingShingle Silke Fürst
Silvio Waisbord. “The communication manifesto”
Studies in Communication Sciences
author_facet Silke Fürst
author_sort Silke Fürst
title Silvio Waisbord. “The communication manifesto”
title_short Silvio Waisbord. “The communication manifesto”
title_full Silvio Waisbord. “The communication manifesto”
title_fullStr Silvio Waisbord. “The communication manifesto”
title_full_unstemmed Silvio Waisbord. “The communication manifesto”
title_sort silvio waisbord. “the communication manifesto”
publisher Seismo Verlag
series Studies in Communication Sciences
issn 1424-4896
2296-4150
publishDate 2020-07-01
description The "communication manifesto" is a timely book that calls for more public scholarship in communication and media studies. It aims to develop ideas that further stimulate conversation about our contribution to society and, most importantly, action that strengthens “scholars’ engagement with publics beyond academia” (p. 9). This means not only to communicate and discuss scientific knowledge in and with various publics but also to do research with practical implications and learn from the public. The author, Silvio Waisbord, is a professor at the George Washington University and published many pertinent articles and books in the fields of journalism, media policy, participatory and democratic communication, populism, human rights, and health communication. Over the years, he has gained profound insights in the development and diversity of communication scholarship by working and lecturing across the world. With his book, Waisbord addresses a long-standing discussion in our discipline. Over the last decades, many researchers have criticized that communication research does not contribute sufficiently to public discourses on media and communication and thereby misses opportunities to contribute its knowledge and demonstrate its social relevance (see Altmeppen, 2012, pp. 37–38; Brantner & Huber, 2013, p. 250; Craig, 2008; Docherty, Morrison, & Tracey, 1993; Fengler & Eberwein, 2012; Ruß-Mohl, 2006, p. 203; Wartella, 1993). Most recently, this discussion has gained renewed momentum.
work_keys_str_mv AT silkefurst silviowaisbordthecommunicationmanifesto
_version_ 1721300550229688320