Predictors of Biological Age: The Implications for Wellness and Aging Research

As healthspan and lifespan research breakthroughs have become more commonplace, the need for valid, practical markers of biological age is becoming increasingly paramount. The accessibility and affordability of biological age predictors that can reveal information about mortality and morbidity risk,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Trevor Lohman, Gurinder Bains, Lee Berk, Everett Lohman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-09-01
Series:Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/23337214211046419
id doaj-44ea2b5ff60142a6bde15c03ea404c89
record_format Article
spelling doaj-44ea2b5ff60142a6bde15c03ea404c892021-09-26T21:33:21ZengSAGE PublishingGerontology and Geriatric Medicine2333-72142021-09-01710.1177/23337214211046419Predictors of Biological Age: The Implications for Wellness and Aging ResearchTrevor LohmanGurinder BainsLee BerkEverett LohmanAs healthspan and lifespan research breakthroughs have become more commonplace, the need for valid, practical markers of biological age is becoming increasingly paramount. The accessibility and affordability of biological age predictors that can reveal information about mortality and morbidity risk, as well as remaining years of life, has profound clinical and research implications. In this review, we examine 5 groups of aging biomarkers capable of providing accurate biological age estimations. The unique capabilities of these biomarkers have far reaching implications for the testing of both pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions designed to slow or reverse biological aging. Additionally, the enhanced validity and availability of these tools may have increasingly relevant clinical value. The authors of this review explore those implications, with an emphasis on lifestyle modification research, and provide an overview of the current evidence regarding 5 biological age predictor categories: Telomere length, composite biomarkers, DNA methylation “epigenetic clocks,” transcriptional predictors of biological age, and functional age predictors.https://doi.org/10.1177/23337214211046419
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Trevor Lohman
Gurinder Bains
Lee Berk
Everett Lohman
spellingShingle Trevor Lohman
Gurinder Bains
Lee Berk
Everett Lohman
Predictors of Biological Age: The Implications for Wellness and Aging Research
Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine
author_facet Trevor Lohman
Gurinder Bains
Lee Berk
Everett Lohman
author_sort Trevor Lohman
title Predictors of Biological Age: The Implications for Wellness and Aging Research
title_short Predictors of Biological Age: The Implications for Wellness and Aging Research
title_full Predictors of Biological Age: The Implications for Wellness and Aging Research
title_fullStr Predictors of Biological Age: The Implications for Wellness and Aging Research
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of Biological Age: The Implications for Wellness and Aging Research
title_sort predictors of biological age: the implications for wellness and aging research
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine
issn 2333-7214
publishDate 2021-09-01
description As healthspan and lifespan research breakthroughs have become more commonplace, the need for valid, practical markers of biological age is becoming increasingly paramount. The accessibility and affordability of biological age predictors that can reveal information about mortality and morbidity risk, as well as remaining years of life, has profound clinical and research implications. In this review, we examine 5 groups of aging biomarkers capable of providing accurate biological age estimations. The unique capabilities of these biomarkers have far reaching implications for the testing of both pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions designed to slow or reverse biological aging. Additionally, the enhanced validity and availability of these tools may have increasingly relevant clinical value. The authors of this review explore those implications, with an emphasis on lifestyle modification research, and provide an overview of the current evidence regarding 5 biological age predictor categories: Telomere length, composite biomarkers, DNA methylation “epigenetic clocks,” transcriptional predictors of biological age, and functional age predictors.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/23337214211046419
work_keys_str_mv AT trevorlohman predictorsofbiologicalagetheimplicationsforwellnessandagingresearch
AT gurinderbains predictorsofbiologicalagetheimplicationsforwellnessandagingresearch
AT leeberk predictorsofbiologicalagetheimplicationsforwellnessandagingresearch
AT everettlohman predictorsofbiologicalagetheimplicationsforwellnessandagingresearch
_version_ 1716867537049747456