Development of Service Quality Scale for Surgical Hospitalization

Findings from literature showed inconsistent results for applying service quality scale in hospitals. Moreover, hospitalization services are provided by diversified departments and a scale designed to measure the overall hospitalization quality is difficult and capturing special characteristics of d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ching-I Teng, Ching-Kang Ing, Hao-Yuan Chang, Kuo-Piao Chung
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2007-01-01
Series:Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664609602977
id doaj-44d4a4dee065429baa05057b94b1178e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-44d4a4dee065429baa05057b94b1178e2020-11-24T21:19:18ZengElsevierJournal of the Formosan Medical Association0929-66462007-01-01106647548410.1016/S0929-6646(09)60297-7Development of Service Quality Scale for Surgical HospitalizationChing-I Teng0Ching-Kang Ing1Hao-Yuan Chang2Kuo-Piao Chung3Department of Business Administration, Chang Gung University, Taipei, TaiwanInstitute of Statistical Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei, TaiwanGraduate Institute of Nursing, Taipei, TaiwanGraduate Institute of Health Care Organization Administration, Taipei, TaiwanFindings from literature showed inconsistent results for applying service quality scale in hospitals. Moreover, hospitalization services are provided by diversified departments and a scale designed to measure the overall hospitalization quality is difficult and capturing special characteristics of different departments is also not an easy task. This study attempted to develop a service quality scale for surgical hospitalization (SQSH). Methods: Forty-two items were designed via literature review, interviews with patients, health professionals and experienced care givers. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in one hospital. A total of 271 patients in surgical wards were chosen using stratified random sampling; 57.7% of the sampled patients were aged below 55, and 52.2% were male. Results: The response rate was 93.4%. Twenty-nine items were retained through the scale development process and six factors were formed: needs management, assurance, sanitation, customization, convenience and quiet, and attention. Six factors explained 57.3% of total variance. Five experts assessed the content validity; content validity index was 0.964. Furthermore, all Cronbach's a exceeded 0.642 and all factor loadings exceeded 0.5. The concurrent validity correlation was 0.583, which had a p value below 0.01. Conclusion: The SQSH has sufficient usefulness, reliability and validity. Future research on service quality can apply the SQSH scale to link with utilization intention and patient loyalty and attempt to develop a hospitalization quality scale for other departments.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664609602977scale developmentservice qualitysurgical hospitalization
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ching-I Teng
Ching-Kang Ing
Hao-Yuan Chang
Kuo-Piao Chung
spellingShingle Ching-I Teng
Ching-Kang Ing
Hao-Yuan Chang
Kuo-Piao Chung
Development of Service Quality Scale for Surgical Hospitalization
Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
scale development
service quality
surgical hospitalization
author_facet Ching-I Teng
Ching-Kang Ing
Hao-Yuan Chang
Kuo-Piao Chung
author_sort Ching-I Teng
title Development of Service Quality Scale for Surgical Hospitalization
title_short Development of Service Quality Scale for Surgical Hospitalization
title_full Development of Service Quality Scale for Surgical Hospitalization
title_fullStr Development of Service Quality Scale for Surgical Hospitalization
title_full_unstemmed Development of Service Quality Scale for Surgical Hospitalization
title_sort development of service quality scale for surgical hospitalization
publisher Elsevier
series Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
issn 0929-6646
publishDate 2007-01-01
description Findings from literature showed inconsistent results for applying service quality scale in hospitals. Moreover, hospitalization services are provided by diversified departments and a scale designed to measure the overall hospitalization quality is difficult and capturing special characteristics of different departments is also not an easy task. This study attempted to develop a service quality scale for surgical hospitalization (SQSH). Methods: Forty-two items were designed via literature review, interviews with patients, health professionals and experienced care givers. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in one hospital. A total of 271 patients in surgical wards were chosen using stratified random sampling; 57.7% of the sampled patients were aged below 55, and 52.2% were male. Results: The response rate was 93.4%. Twenty-nine items were retained through the scale development process and six factors were formed: needs management, assurance, sanitation, customization, convenience and quiet, and attention. Six factors explained 57.3% of total variance. Five experts assessed the content validity; content validity index was 0.964. Furthermore, all Cronbach's a exceeded 0.642 and all factor loadings exceeded 0.5. The concurrent validity correlation was 0.583, which had a p value below 0.01. Conclusion: The SQSH has sufficient usefulness, reliability and validity. Future research on service quality can apply the SQSH scale to link with utilization intention and patient loyalty and attempt to develop a hospitalization quality scale for other departments.
topic scale development
service quality
surgical hospitalization
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664609602977
work_keys_str_mv AT chingiteng developmentofservicequalityscaleforsurgicalhospitalization
AT chingkanging developmentofservicequalityscaleforsurgicalhospitalization
AT haoyuanchang developmentofservicequalityscaleforsurgicalhospitalization
AT kuopiaochung developmentofservicequalityscaleforsurgicalhospitalization
_version_ 1726006014252154880