Does China’s Municipal Solid Waste Source Separation Program Work? Evidence from the Spatial-Two-Stage-Least Squares Models
This paper evaluates the impact of the second municipal solid waste (MSW) source separation program on municipal solid waste generation (MSWG) in China. Without considering the spatial interactions between cities, the second MSW source separation program has a nonsignificant adverse effect on the pe...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1664 |
id |
doaj-449ddcaa73604feab943fce4d7d3d53b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-449ddcaa73604feab943fce4d7d3d53b2020-11-24T21:54:17ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-02-01124166410.3390/su12041664su12041664Does China’s Municipal Solid Waste Source Separation Program Work? Evidence from the Spatial-Two-Stage-Least Squares ModelsLiange Zhao0Jianfeng Zou1Zhijian Zhang2School of Economics, Zhejiang Gongshang University, 18 Xuezheng Road, Hangzhou 310018, ChinaSchool of Economics, Zhejiang Gongshang University, 18 Xuezheng Road, Hangzhou 310018, ChinaSchool of Economics, Zhejiang Gongshang University, 18 Xuezheng Road, Hangzhou 310018, ChinaThis paper evaluates the impact of the second municipal solid waste (MSW) source separation program on municipal solid waste generation (MSWG) in China. Without considering the spatial interactions between cities, the second MSW source separation program has a nonsignificant adverse effect on the per capita municipal solid waste generation (PMSWG). Relaxing the stable-unit-treatment-value assumption (SUTVA), which holds in most of the previous estimation literature on treatment effects, involving the spatial spillover effect among cities, as well as correcting the endogenous local policy has a significantly negative but not robust impact on the PMSWG. The estimation results of the generalized nesting spatial regression models (GNS) imply that the spatial interaction characteristics among Chinese prefecture-level cities may, if neglected, lead to underestimation of the reduction effects of the second MSW source separation policy on the absolute amount of PMSWG. More importantly, our study indicates that although not all the spatial econometric models support the significant reduction effect of source separation on the absolute amount of PMSWG, the source separation program significantly reduces the relative amount of PMSWG, and this result is robust in all spatial models.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1664spatial-two-stage-least squares modelsthe second msw source separation program in chinaprogram evaluation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Liange Zhao Jianfeng Zou Zhijian Zhang |
spellingShingle |
Liange Zhao Jianfeng Zou Zhijian Zhang Does China’s Municipal Solid Waste Source Separation Program Work? Evidence from the Spatial-Two-Stage-Least Squares Models Sustainability spatial-two-stage-least squares models the second msw source separation program in china program evaluation |
author_facet |
Liange Zhao Jianfeng Zou Zhijian Zhang |
author_sort |
Liange Zhao |
title |
Does China’s Municipal Solid Waste Source Separation Program Work? Evidence from the Spatial-Two-Stage-Least Squares Models |
title_short |
Does China’s Municipal Solid Waste Source Separation Program Work? Evidence from the Spatial-Two-Stage-Least Squares Models |
title_full |
Does China’s Municipal Solid Waste Source Separation Program Work? Evidence from the Spatial-Two-Stage-Least Squares Models |
title_fullStr |
Does China’s Municipal Solid Waste Source Separation Program Work? Evidence from the Spatial-Two-Stage-Least Squares Models |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does China’s Municipal Solid Waste Source Separation Program Work? Evidence from the Spatial-Two-Stage-Least Squares Models |
title_sort |
does china’s municipal solid waste source separation program work? evidence from the spatial-two-stage-least squares models |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
This paper evaluates the impact of the second municipal solid waste (MSW) source separation program on municipal solid waste generation (MSWG) in China. Without considering the spatial interactions between cities, the second MSW source separation program has a nonsignificant adverse effect on the per capita municipal solid waste generation (PMSWG). Relaxing the stable-unit-treatment-value assumption (SUTVA), which holds in most of the previous estimation literature on treatment effects, involving the spatial spillover effect among cities, as well as correcting the endogenous local policy has a significantly negative but not robust impact on the PMSWG. The estimation results of the generalized nesting spatial regression models (GNS) imply that the spatial interaction characteristics among Chinese prefecture-level cities may, if neglected, lead to underestimation of the reduction effects of the second MSW source separation policy on the absolute amount of PMSWG. More importantly, our study indicates that although not all the spatial econometric models support the significant reduction effect of source separation on the absolute amount of PMSWG, the source separation program significantly reduces the relative amount of PMSWG, and this result is robust in all spatial models. |
topic |
spatial-two-stage-least squares models the second msw source separation program in china program evaluation |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1664 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT liangezhao doeschinasmunicipalsolidwastesourceseparationprogramworkevidencefromthespatialtwostageleastsquaresmodels AT jianfengzou doeschinasmunicipalsolidwastesourceseparationprogramworkevidencefromthespatialtwostageleastsquaresmodels AT zhijianzhang doeschinasmunicipalsolidwastesourceseparationprogramworkevidencefromthespatialtwostageleastsquaresmodels |
_version_ |
1725867856627761152 |