Does China’s Municipal Solid Waste Source Separation Program Work? Evidence from the Spatial-Two-Stage-Least Squares Models

This paper evaluates the impact of the second municipal solid waste (MSW) source separation program on municipal solid waste generation (MSWG) in China. Without considering the spatial interactions between cities, the second MSW source separation program has a nonsignificant adverse effect on the pe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liange Zhao, Jianfeng Zou, Zhijian Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-02-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1664
id doaj-449ddcaa73604feab943fce4d7d3d53b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-449ddcaa73604feab943fce4d7d3d53b2020-11-24T21:54:17ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-02-01124166410.3390/su12041664su12041664Does China’s Municipal Solid Waste Source Separation Program Work? Evidence from the Spatial-Two-Stage-Least Squares ModelsLiange Zhao0Jianfeng Zou1Zhijian Zhang2School of Economics, Zhejiang Gongshang University, 18 Xuezheng Road, Hangzhou 310018, ChinaSchool of Economics, Zhejiang Gongshang University, 18 Xuezheng Road, Hangzhou 310018, ChinaSchool of Economics, Zhejiang Gongshang University, 18 Xuezheng Road, Hangzhou 310018, ChinaThis paper evaluates the impact of the second municipal solid waste (MSW) source separation program on municipal solid waste generation (MSWG) in China. Without considering the spatial interactions between cities, the second MSW source separation program has a nonsignificant adverse effect on the per capita municipal solid waste generation (PMSWG). Relaxing the stable-unit-treatment-value assumption (SUTVA), which holds in most of the previous estimation literature on treatment effects, involving the spatial spillover effect among cities, as well as correcting the endogenous local policy has a significantly negative but not robust impact on the PMSWG. The estimation results of the generalized nesting spatial regression models (GNS) imply that the spatial interaction characteristics among Chinese prefecture-level cities may, if neglected, lead to underestimation of the reduction effects of the second MSW source separation policy on the absolute amount of PMSWG. More importantly, our study indicates that although not all the spatial econometric models support the significant reduction effect of source separation on the absolute amount of PMSWG, the source separation program significantly reduces the relative amount of PMSWG, and this result is robust in all spatial models.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1664spatial-two-stage-least squares modelsthe second msw source separation program in chinaprogram evaluation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Liange Zhao
Jianfeng Zou
Zhijian Zhang
spellingShingle Liange Zhao
Jianfeng Zou
Zhijian Zhang
Does China’s Municipal Solid Waste Source Separation Program Work? Evidence from the Spatial-Two-Stage-Least Squares Models
Sustainability
spatial-two-stage-least squares models
the second msw source separation program in china
program evaluation
author_facet Liange Zhao
Jianfeng Zou
Zhijian Zhang
author_sort Liange Zhao
title Does China’s Municipal Solid Waste Source Separation Program Work? Evidence from the Spatial-Two-Stage-Least Squares Models
title_short Does China’s Municipal Solid Waste Source Separation Program Work? Evidence from the Spatial-Two-Stage-Least Squares Models
title_full Does China’s Municipal Solid Waste Source Separation Program Work? Evidence from the Spatial-Two-Stage-Least Squares Models
title_fullStr Does China’s Municipal Solid Waste Source Separation Program Work? Evidence from the Spatial-Two-Stage-Least Squares Models
title_full_unstemmed Does China’s Municipal Solid Waste Source Separation Program Work? Evidence from the Spatial-Two-Stage-Least Squares Models
title_sort does china’s municipal solid waste source separation program work? evidence from the spatial-two-stage-least squares models
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2020-02-01
description This paper evaluates the impact of the second municipal solid waste (MSW) source separation program on municipal solid waste generation (MSWG) in China. Without considering the spatial interactions between cities, the second MSW source separation program has a nonsignificant adverse effect on the per capita municipal solid waste generation (PMSWG). Relaxing the stable-unit-treatment-value assumption (SUTVA), which holds in most of the previous estimation literature on treatment effects, involving the spatial spillover effect among cities, as well as correcting the endogenous local policy has a significantly negative but not robust impact on the PMSWG. The estimation results of the generalized nesting spatial regression models (GNS) imply that the spatial interaction characteristics among Chinese prefecture-level cities may, if neglected, lead to underestimation of the reduction effects of the second MSW source separation policy on the absolute amount of PMSWG. More importantly, our study indicates that although not all the spatial econometric models support the significant reduction effect of source separation on the absolute amount of PMSWG, the source separation program significantly reduces the relative amount of PMSWG, and this result is robust in all spatial models.
topic spatial-two-stage-least squares models
the second msw source separation program in china
program evaluation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1664
work_keys_str_mv AT liangezhao doeschinasmunicipalsolidwastesourceseparationprogramworkevidencefromthespatialtwostageleastsquaresmodels
AT jianfengzou doeschinasmunicipalsolidwastesourceseparationprogramworkevidencefromthespatialtwostageleastsquaresmodels
AT zhijianzhang doeschinasmunicipalsolidwastesourceseparationprogramworkevidencefromthespatialtwostageleastsquaresmodels
_version_ 1725867856627761152