A Spring without Water: The Conundrum of Anti-Dumping Duties in South African Law

The Agreement on the Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (1994) (Anti-Dumping Agreement) permits the imposition of anti-dumping duties for as long and to the extent necessary to counteract dumping which is causing injury, subject to the proviso that they must b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Clive Vinti
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: North-West University 2016-08-01
Series:Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.assaf.org.za/per/article/view/723/1191
id doaj-449c262f768d42998c2d92f5e083dd9b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-449c262f768d42998c2d92f5e083dd9b2020-11-25T03:50:51ZafrNorth-West UniversityPotchefstroom Electronic Law Journal1727-37812016-08-0116125http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2016/v19n0a723A Spring without Water: The Conundrum of Anti-Dumping Duties in South African LawClive Vinti0University of the Free StateThe Agreement on the Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (1994) (Anti-Dumping Agreement) permits the imposition of anti-dumping duties for as long and to the extent necessary to counteract dumping which is causing injury, subject to the proviso that they must be terminated after five years unless a sunset review has been initiated. A sunset review has the purpose of either permitting or terminating the continuation of an anti-dumping duty. This is significant because if the sunset review is not initiated prior to the expiry of the five-year period, the anti-dumping duties will be terminated. Therefore, this places an emphasis on the determination of the precise date of commencement of the anti-dumping duties. This is because an incorrect determination of the date of the imposition of the anti-dumping duty has obvious financial implications for the interested parties. The Supreme Court of Appeal in South Africa has delivered two salient judgments in this regard: firstly, in Progress Office Machines CC v SARS 2008 2 SA 13 (SCA) (POM), and then more recently, in Association of Meat Importers v ITAC 2013 4 All SA 253 (SCA) (AMIE). This paper contends that these two judgments are in conflict and are riddled with inconsistencies. Secondly, the paper contends that the SCA has in the recent AMIE case virtually rewritten its earlier judgment of Progress Office Machines. Lastly, the paper shows that the approach of South African courts to whether the Anti-Dumping Agreement is binding on South African law is fraught with uncertainty and ambivalence. The case analysis also reflects on the impact of the newly minted but yet to be implemented Customs Duty Act with a view to assessing the impact of the new legislation on the issues currently plaguing the anti-dumping regime of South Africa.http://journals.assaf.org.za/per/article/view/723/1191Dumpingimpositionprovisional paymentspublicationsunset reviewanti-dumping dutyratification
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Clive Vinti
spellingShingle Clive Vinti
A Spring without Water: The Conundrum of Anti-Dumping Duties in South African Law
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
Dumping
imposition
provisional payments
publication
sunset review
anti-dumping duty
ratification
author_facet Clive Vinti
author_sort Clive Vinti
title A Spring without Water: The Conundrum of Anti-Dumping Duties in South African Law
title_short A Spring without Water: The Conundrum of Anti-Dumping Duties in South African Law
title_full A Spring without Water: The Conundrum of Anti-Dumping Duties in South African Law
title_fullStr A Spring without Water: The Conundrum of Anti-Dumping Duties in South African Law
title_full_unstemmed A Spring without Water: The Conundrum of Anti-Dumping Duties in South African Law
title_sort spring without water: the conundrum of anti-dumping duties in south african law
publisher North-West University
series Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
issn 1727-3781
publishDate 2016-08-01
description The Agreement on the Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (1994) (Anti-Dumping Agreement) permits the imposition of anti-dumping duties for as long and to the extent necessary to counteract dumping which is causing injury, subject to the proviso that they must be terminated after five years unless a sunset review has been initiated. A sunset review has the purpose of either permitting or terminating the continuation of an anti-dumping duty. This is significant because if the sunset review is not initiated prior to the expiry of the five-year period, the anti-dumping duties will be terminated. Therefore, this places an emphasis on the determination of the precise date of commencement of the anti-dumping duties. This is because an incorrect determination of the date of the imposition of the anti-dumping duty has obvious financial implications for the interested parties. The Supreme Court of Appeal in South Africa has delivered two salient judgments in this regard: firstly, in Progress Office Machines CC v SARS 2008 2 SA 13 (SCA) (POM), and then more recently, in Association of Meat Importers v ITAC 2013 4 All SA 253 (SCA) (AMIE). This paper contends that these two judgments are in conflict and are riddled with inconsistencies. Secondly, the paper contends that the SCA has in the recent AMIE case virtually rewritten its earlier judgment of Progress Office Machines. Lastly, the paper shows that the approach of South African courts to whether the Anti-Dumping Agreement is binding on South African law is fraught with uncertainty and ambivalence. The case analysis also reflects on the impact of the newly minted but yet to be implemented Customs Duty Act with a view to assessing the impact of the new legislation on the issues currently plaguing the anti-dumping regime of South Africa.
topic Dumping
imposition
provisional payments
publication
sunset review
anti-dumping duty
ratification
url http://journals.assaf.org.za/per/article/view/723/1191
work_keys_str_mv AT clivevinti aspringwithoutwatertheconundrumofantidumpingdutiesinsouthafricanlaw
AT clivevinti springwithoutwatertheconundrumofantidumpingdutiesinsouthafricanlaw
_version_ 1724490416269557760