Evaluating transformation progress of historically disadvantaged South Africans: Programme perspective on the downstream petroleum industry

Background: Since the dawn of democracy in 1994, the South African (SA) government has sought to ensure economic transformation of historically disadvantaged people, using a series of programmes and projects. The petroleum downstream of SA, regulated by the Department of Energy, is among the industr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Msuthukazi Makiva, Isioma Ile, Omololu M. Fagbadebo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2019-06-01
Series:African Evaluation Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/373
id doaj-4498263285e047f4aa46ae8a010edacd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4498263285e047f4aa46ae8a010edacd2020-11-25T03:25:34ZengAOSISAfrican Evaluation Journal2310-49882306-51332019-06-0171e1e1210.4102/aej.v7i1.373114Evaluating transformation progress of historically disadvantaged South Africans: Programme perspective on the downstream petroleum industryMsuthukazi Makiva0Isioma Ile1Omololu M. Fagbadebo2School of Government, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape TownSchool of Government, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape TownDepartment of Public Management, Law and Economics, Durban University of Technology, PietermaritzburgBackground: Since the dawn of democracy in 1994, the South African (SA) government has sought to ensure economic transformation of historically disadvantaged people, using a series of programmes and projects. The petroleum downstream of SA, regulated by the Department of Energy, is among the industries that government uses to maximise transformation. Through a licensing sub-programme, one major condition stipulated prior to awarding licences to operate is the inclusion of historically disadvantaged South Africans in the business plans. Objectives: This article evaluates the extent to which one of the sub-programmes developed to empower historically disadvantaged South Africans (HDSA) in the downstream petroleum industry (petroleum licensing) meets the requirements of the identified relevant evaluation criteria, based on the guidelines of the Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (DAC/OECD). Method: This sub-programme (partial summative evaluation) is critical as it sought to determine its alignment to the tenets of government policy of addressing past inequity by means of economic ownership. The DAC/OECD evaluation criteria were selected to measure the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability of the sub-programme. The justification for using this model is that it is appropriate to public policy response and management tool, especially for developing countries. Some of these measurements were conducted qualitatively, while some were done quantitatively. Results: Emerging data trends analysed indicate that there is a great deal of efficiency in the delivery of licences to operate in the downstream petroleum sector as these were issued in high volumes. The same cannot be said about the HDSAs’ economic empowerment, by means of ‘dealer’ and ‘company’ ownership. Conclusion: Research concludes that the lack of critical resources, such as funding, land, infrastructure and critical skills, were the main reasons why the sub-programme is DAC/OECD non-compliant.https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/373transformationprogramme evaluationlicensingpetroleum downstreamhistorically disadvantaged south africans
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Msuthukazi Makiva
Isioma Ile
Omololu M. Fagbadebo
spellingShingle Msuthukazi Makiva
Isioma Ile
Omololu M. Fagbadebo
Evaluating transformation progress of historically disadvantaged South Africans: Programme perspective on the downstream petroleum industry
African Evaluation Journal
transformation
programme evaluation
licensing
petroleum downstream
historically disadvantaged south africans
author_facet Msuthukazi Makiva
Isioma Ile
Omololu M. Fagbadebo
author_sort Msuthukazi Makiva
title Evaluating transformation progress of historically disadvantaged South Africans: Programme perspective on the downstream petroleum industry
title_short Evaluating transformation progress of historically disadvantaged South Africans: Programme perspective on the downstream petroleum industry
title_full Evaluating transformation progress of historically disadvantaged South Africans: Programme perspective on the downstream petroleum industry
title_fullStr Evaluating transformation progress of historically disadvantaged South Africans: Programme perspective on the downstream petroleum industry
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating transformation progress of historically disadvantaged South Africans: Programme perspective on the downstream petroleum industry
title_sort evaluating transformation progress of historically disadvantaged south africans: programme perspective on the downstream petroleum industry
publisher AOSIS
series African Evaluation Journal
issn 2310-4988
2306-5133
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Background: Since the dawn of democracy in 1994, the South African (SA) government has sought to ensure economic transformation of historically disadvantaged people, using a series of programmes and projects. The petroleum downstream of SA, regulated by the Department of Energy, is among the industries that government uses to maximise transformation. Through a licensing sub-programme, one major condition stipulated prior to awarding licences to operate is the inclusion of historically disadvantaged South Africans in the business plans. Objectives: This article evaluates the extent to which one of the sub-programmes developed to empower historically disadvantaged South Africans (HDSA) in the downstream petroleum industry (petroleum licensing) meets the requirements of the identified relevant evaluation criteria, based on the guidelines of the Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (DAC/OECD). Method: This sub-programme (partial summative evaluation) is critical as it sought to determine its alignment to the tenets of government policy of addressing past inequity by means of economic ownership. The DAC/OECD evaluation criteria were selected to measure the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability of the sub-programme. The justification for using this model is that it is appropriate to public policy response and management tool, especially for developing countries. Some of these measurements were conducted qualitatively, while some were done quantitatively. Results: Emerging data trends analysed indicate that there is a great deal of efficiency in the delivery of licences to operate in the downstream petroleum sector as these were issued in high volumes. The same cannot be said about the HDSAs’ economic empowerment, by means of ‘dealer’ and ‘company’ ownership. Conclusion: Research concludes that the lack of critical resources, such as funding, land, infrastructure and critical skills, were the main reasons why the sub-programme is DAC/OECD non-compliant.
topic transformation
programme evaluation
licensing
petroleum downstream
historically disadvantaged south africans
url https://aejonline.org/index.php/aej/article/view/373
work_keys_str_mv AT msuthukazimakiva evaluatingtransformationprogressofhistoricallydisadvantagedsouthafricansprogrammeperspectiveonthedownstreampetroleumindustry
AT isiomaile evaluatingtransformationprogressofhistoricallydisadvantagedsouthafricansprogrammeperspectiveonthedownstreampetroleumindustry
AT omololumfagbadebo evaluatingtransformationprogressofhistoricallydisadvantagedsouthafricansprogrammeperspectiveonthedownstreampetroleumindustry
_version_ 1724596238887682048