Child Protection in Sport: Reflections on Thirty Years of Science and Activism

This paper examines the responses of state and third sector agencies to the emergence of child abuse in sport since the mid-1980s. As with other social institutions such as the church, health and education, sport has both initiated its own child protection interventions and also responded to wider s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Celia H. Brackenridge, Daniel Rhind
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-07-01
Series:Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/3/3/326
id doaj-4495db1ff1e34ad49c6c9904f269fca0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4495db1ff1e34ad49c6c9904f269fca02020-11-24T23:19:28ZengMDPI AGSocial Sciences2076-07602014-07-013332634010.3390/socsci3030326socsci3030326Child Protection in Sport: Reflections on Thirty Years of Science and ActivismCelia H. Brackenridge0Daniel Rhind1Centre for Sport, Health and Well-being, Heinz Wolff Building, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UKCentre for Sport, Health and Well-being, Heinz Wolff Building, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UKThis paper examines the responses of state and third sector agencies to the emergence of child abuse in sport since the mid-1980s. As with other social institutions such as the church, health and education, sport has both initiated its own child protection interventions and also responded to wider social and political influences. Sport has exemplified many of the changes identified in the brief for this special issue, such as the widening of definitional focus, increasing geographic scope and broadening of concerns to encompass health and welfare. The child protection agenda in sport was initially driven by sexual abuse scandals and has since embraced a range of additional harms to children, such as physical and psychological abuse, neglect and damaging hazing (initiation) rituals. Whereas in the 1990s, only a few sport organisations acknowledged or addressed child abuse and protection (notably, UK, Canada and Australia), there has since been rapid growth in interest in the issue internationally, with many agencies now taking an active role in prevention work. These agencies adopt different foci related to their overall mission and may be characterised broadly as sport-specific (focussing on abuse prevention in sport), children’s rights organisations (focussing on child protection around sport events) and humanitarian organisations (focussing on child development and protection through sport). This article examines how these differences in organisational focus lead to very different child protection approaches and “solutions”. It critiques the scientific approaches used thus far to inform activism and policy changes and ends by considering future challenges for athlete safeguarding and welfare.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/3/3/326sportchild abuse and protectionathlete welfarehuman rights
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Celia H. Brackenridge
Daniel Rhind
spellingShingle Celia H. Brackenridge
Daniel Rhind
Child Protection in Sport: Reflections on Thirty Years of Science and Activism
Social Sciences
sport
child abuse and protection
athlete welfare
human rights
author_facet Celia H. Brackenridge
Daniel Rhind
author_sort Celia H. Brackenridge
title Child Protection in Sport: Reflections on Thirty Years of Science and Activism
title_short Child Protection in Sport: Reflections on Thirty Years of Science and Activism
title_full Child Protection in Sport: Reflections on Thirty Years of Science and Activism
title_fullStr Child Protection in Sport: Reflections on Thirty Years of Science and Activism
title_full_unstemmed Child Protection in Sport: Reflections on Thirty Years of Science and Activism
title_sort child protection in sport: reflections on thirty years of science and activism
publisher MDPI AG
series Social Sciences
issn 2076-0760
publishDate 2014-07-01
description This paper examines the responses of state and third sector agencies to the emergence of child abuse in sport since the mid-1980s. As with other social institutions such as the church, health and education, sport has both initiated its own child protection interventions and also responded to wider social and political influences. Sport has exemplified many of the changes identified in the brief for this special issue, such as the widening of definitional focus, increasing geographic scope and broadening of concerns to encompass health and welfare. The child protection agenda in sport was initially driven by sexual abuse scandals and has since embraced a range of additional harms to children, such as physical and psychological abuse, neglect and damaging hazing (initiation) rituals. Whereas in the 1990s, only a few sport organisations acknowledged or addressed child abuse and protection (notably, UK, Canada and Australia), there has since been rapid growth in interest in the issue internationally, with many agencies now taking an active role in prevention work. These agencies adopt different foci related to their overall mission and may be characterised broadly as sport-specific (focussing on abuse prevention in sport), children’s rights organisations (focussing on child protection around sport events) and humanitarian organisations (focussing on child development and protection through sport). This article examines how these differences in organisational focus lead to very different child protection approaches and “solutions”. It critiques the scientific approaches used thus far to inform activism and policy changes and ends by considering future challenges for athlete safeguarding and welfare.
topic sport
child abuse and protection
athlete welfare
human rights
url http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/3/3/326
work_keys_str_mv AT celiahbrackenridge childprotectioninsportreflectionsonthirtyyearsofscienceandactivism
AT danielrhind childprotectioninsportreflectionsonthirtyyearsofscienceandactivism
_version_ 1725578798640922624