Striking differences between knockout and wild-type mice in global gene expression variability.

Microarray analyses of gene knockouts have traditionally focused on the identification of genes whose mean expression is different in knockout and wild-type mice. However, recent work suggests that changes in the variability of gene expression can have important phenotypic consequences as well. Here...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Satish A Eraly
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4022672?pdf=render
id doaj-448ec8a932344ace81620cd3e1800095
record_format Article
spelling doaj-448ec8a932344ace81620cd3e18000952020-11-25T01:00:26ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0195e9773410.1371/journal.pone.0097734Striking differences between knockout and wild-type mice in global gene expression variability.Satish A EralyMicroarray analyses of gene knockouts have traditionally focused on the identification of genes whose mean expression is different in knockout and wild-type mice. However, recent work suggests that changes in the variability of gene expression can have important phenotypic consequences as well. Here, in an unbiased sample of publicly available microarray data on gene expression in various knockouts, highly significant differences from wild-type (either increases or decreases) are noted in the gene expression coefficients of variation (CVs) of virtually every knockout considered. Examination of the distribution of gene-by-gene CV differences indicates that these findings are not attributable to a few outlier genes, but rather to broadly increased or decreased CV in the various knockouts over all the (tens of thousands of) transcripts assayed. These global differences in variability may reflect either authentic biological effects of the knockouts or merely experimental inconsistencies. However, regardless of the underlying explanation, the variability differences are of importance as they will influence both the statistical detection of gene expression changes and, potentially, the knockout phenotype itself.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4022672?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Satish A Eraly
spellingShingle Satish A Eraly
Striking differences between knockout and wild-type mice in global gene expression variability.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Satish A Eraly
author_sort Satish A Eraly
title Striking differences between knockout and wild-type mice in global gene expression variability.
title_short Striking differences between knockout and wild-type mice in global gene expression variability.
title_full Striking differences between knockout and wild-type mice in global gene expression variability.
title_fullStr Striking differences between knockout and wild-type mice in global gene expression variability.
title_full_unstemmed Striking differences between knockout and wild-type mice in global gene expression variability.
title_sort striking differences between knockout and wild-type mice in global gene expression variability.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Microarray analyses of gene knockouts have traditionally focused on the identification of genes whose mean expression is different in knockout and wild-type mice. However, recent work suggests that changes in the variability of gene expression can have important phenotypic consequences as well. Here, in an unbiased sample of publicly available microarray data on gene expression in various knockouts, highly significant differences from wild-type (either increases or decreases) are noted in the gene expression coefficients of variation (CVs) of virtually every knockout considered. Examination of the distribution of gene-by-gene CV differences indicates that these findings are not attributable to a few outlier genes, but rather to broadly increased or decreased CV in the various knockouts over all the (tens of thousands of) transcripts assayed. These global differences in variability may reflect either authentic biological effects of the knockouts or merely experimental inconsistencies. However, regardless of the underlying explanation, the variability differences are of importance as they will influence both the statistical detection of gene expression changes and, potentially, the knockout phenotype itself.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4022672?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT satishaeraly strikingdifferencesbetweenknockoutandwildtypemiceinglobalgeneexpressionvariability
_version_ 1725213410938847232