Re-evaluation of solutions to the problem of unprofessionalism in peer review
Abstract Our recent paper ( https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00096-x ) reported that 43% of reviewer comment sets (n=1491) shared with authors contained at least one unprofessional comment or an incomplete, inaccurate of unsubstantiated critique (IIUC). Publication of this work sparked an online (...
Main Authors: | Travis G. Gerwing, Alyssa M. Allen Gerwing, Chi-Yeung Choi, Stephanie Avery-Gomm, Jeff C. Clements, Joshua A. Rash |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Research Integrity and Peer Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00107-x |
Similar Items
-
Quantifying professionalism in peer review
by: Travis G. Gerwing, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM
by: Nyssa J. Silbiger, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01) -
Perceptions and Incidence of Test Anxiety
by: Travis G. Gerwing, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01) -
Peer Comment
by: Neil Asher Silberman
Published: (2015-05-01) -
Peer Comment
by: Gareth Beale
Published: (2015-05-01)