A METHOD FOR HAEMORRHOIDECTOMY USING MONOPOLAR DIATHERMY WITH WOUND CLOSURE

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of monopolar diathermy haemorrhoidectomy and closure of haemorrhoidectomy wound with conventional Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy in reducing the post operative pain and complications. Also to determine the time of hospital stay, wound healing and return to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mazin Hawaz Al-Hawaz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: university of basrah 2004-06-01
Series:Basrah Journal of Surgery
Online Access:https://bjsrg.uobasrah.edu.iq/article_55585_45bd28ea3199aa64f61678932a6bb575.pdf
Description
Summary:Objective: To compare the effectiveness of monopolar diathermy haemorrhoidectomy and closure of haemorrhoidectomy wound with conventional Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy in reducing the post operative pain and complications. Also to determine the time of hospital stay, wound healing and return to activity. Patients & Methods: A total of 180 patients with symptomatic haemorrhoids (3rd and 4th degree) were studied from May 2000 to March 2003 at Basrah General Hospital. Patients were randomized into two groups; group (A) treated by open haemorrhoidectomy according to Milligan –Morgan (no.=100), and group (B) treated by 30 watts monopolar diathermy haemorrhoidectomy with closure of haemorrhoidectomy wound (no=80). Result: Significant differences between the two groups were noticed regarding the postoperative pain and complications, time of wound healing and return to activity. Conclusion: patients with symptomatic haemorrhoids derive greater benefit from diathermy haemorrhoidectomy with wound closure regarding less postoperative pain and complications, short hospital stay and early return to normal life.
ISSN:1683-3589
2409-501X