A Systematic Review on Case Studies of Remote-Sensing-Based Flood Crop Loss Assessment

This article reviews case studies which have used remote sensing data for different aspects of flood crop loss assessment. The review systematically finds a total of 62 empirical case studies from the past three decades. The number of case studies has recently been increased because of increased ava...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Md. Shahinoor Rahman, Liping Di
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-04-01
Series:Agriculture
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/4/131
id doaj-447d772833164eb98e502f6de5045dc8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-447d772833164eb98e502f6de5045dc82021-04-02T13:26:33ZengMDPI AGAgriculture2077-04722020-04-011013113110.3390/agriculture10040131A Systematic Review on Case Studies of Remote-Sensing-Based Flood Crop Loss AssessmentMd. Shahinoor Rahman0Liping Di1Center for Spatial Information Science and Systems, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USACenter for Spatial Information Science and Systems, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USAThis article reviews case studies which have used remote sensing data for different aspects of flood crop loss assessment. The review systematically finds a total of 62 empirical case studies from the past three decades. The number of case studies has recently been increased because of increased availability of remote sensing data. In the past, flood crop loss assessment was very generalized and time-intensive because of the dependency on the survey-based data collection. Remote sensing data availability makes rapid flood loss assessment possible. This study groups flood crop loss assessment approaches into three broad categories: flood-intensity-based approach, crop-condition-based approach, and a hybrid approach of the two. Flood crop damage assessment is more precise when both flood information and crop condition are incorporated in damage assessment models. This review discusses the strengths and weaknesses of different loss assessment approaches. Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Landsat are the dominant sources of optical remote sensing data for flood crop loss assessment. Remote-sensing-based vegetation indices (VIs) have significantly been utilized for crop damage assessments in recent years. Many case studies also relied on microwave remote sensing data, because of the inability of optical remote sensing to see through clouds. Recent free-of-charge availability of synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) data from Sentinel-1 will advance flood crop damage assessment. Data for the validation of loss assessment models are scarce. Recent advancements of data archiving and distribution through web technologies will be helpful for loss assessment and validation.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/4/131floodcroploss assessmentremote sensingdamage assessment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Md. Shahinoor Rahman
Liping Di
spellingShingle Md. Shahinoor Rahman
Liping Di
A Systematic Review on Case Studies of Remote-Sensing-Based Flood Crop Loss Assessment
Agriculture
flood
crop
loss assessment
remote sensing
damage assessment
author_facet Md. Shahinoor Rahman
Liping Di
author_sort Md. Shahinoor Rahman
title A Systematic Review on Case Studies of Remote-Sensing-Based Flood Crop Loss Assessment
title_short A Systematic Review on Case Studies of Remote-Sensing-Based Flood Crop Loss Assessment
title_full A Systematic Review on Case Studies of Remote-Sensing-Based Flood Crop Loss Assessment
title_fullStr A Systematic Review on Case Studies of Remote-Sensing-Based Flood Crop Loss Assessment
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review on Case Studies of Remote-Sensing-Based Flood Crop Loss Assessment
title_sort systematic review on case studies of remote-sensing-based flood crop loss assessment
publisher MDPI AG
series Agriculture
issn 2077-0472
publishDate 2020-04-01
description This article reviews case studies which have used remote sensing data for different aspects of flood crop loss assessment. The review systematically finds a total of 62 empirical case studies from the past three decades. The number of case studies has recently been increased because of increased availability of remote sensing data. In the past, flood crop loss assessment was very generalized and time-intensive because of the dependency on the survey-based data collection. Remote sensing data availability makes rapid flood loss assessment possible. This study groups flood crop loss assessment approaches into three broad categories: flood-intensity-based approach, crop-condition-based approach, and a hybrid approach of the two. Flood crop damage assessment is more precise when both flood information and crop condition are incorporated in damage assessment models. This review discusses the strengths and weaknesses of different loss assessment approaches. Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Landsat are the dominant sources of optical remote sensing data for flood crop loss assessment. Remote-sensing-based vegetation indices (VIs) have significantly been utilized for crop damage assessments in recent years. Many case studies also relied on microwave remote sensing data, because of the inability of optical remote sensing to see through clouds. Recent free-of-charge availability of synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) data from Sentinel-1 will advance flood crop damage assessment. Data for the validation of loss assessment models are scarce. Recent advancements of data archiving and distribution through web technologies will be helpful for loss assessment and validation.
topic flood
crop
loss assessment
remote sensing
damage assessment
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/4/131
work_keys_str_mv AT mdshahinoorrahman asystematicreviewoncasestudiesofremotesensingbasedfloodcroplossassessment
AT lipingdi asystematicreviewoncasestudiesofremotesensingbasedfloodcroplossassessment
AT mdshahinoorrahman systematicreviewoncasestudiesofremotesensingbasedfloodcroplossassessment
AT lipingdi systematicreviewoncasestudiesofremotesensingbasedfloodcroplossassessment
_version_ 1721565007395684352