First anatomical network analysis of fore- and hindlimb musculoskeletal modularity in bonobos, common chimpanzees, and humans

Abstract Studies of morphological integration and modularity, and of anatomical complexity in human evolution typically focus on skeletal tissues. Here we provide the first network analysis of the musculoskeletal anatomy of both the fore- and hindlimbs of the two species of chimpanzee and humans. Co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rui Diogo, Julia L. Molnar, Campbell Rolian, Borja Esteve-Altava
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2018-05-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25262-6
id doaj-4479423f5c7f46bfa53ad697669d4519
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4479423f5c7f46bfa53ad697669d45192020-12-08T06:00:56ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222018-05-01811910.1038/s41598-018-25262-6First anatomical network analysis of fore- and hindlimb musculoskeletal modularity in bonobos, common chimpanzees, and humansRui Diogo0Julia L. Molnar1Campbell Rolian2Borja Esteve-Altava3Department of Anatomy, Howard University College of MedicineDepartment of Anatomy, Howard University College of MedicineDepartment of comparative biology and experimental medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of CalgaryDepartment of Anatomy, Howard University College of MedicineAbstract Studies of morphological integration and modularity, and of anatomical complexity in human evolution typically focus on skeletal tissues. Here we provide the first network analysis of the musculoskeletal anatomy of both the fore- and hindlimbs of the two species of chimpanzee and humans. Contra long-accepted ideas, network analysis reveals that the hindlimb displays a pattern opposite to that of the forelimb: Pan big toe is typically seen as more independently mobile, but humans are actually the ones that have a separate module exclusively related to its movements. Different fore- vs hindlimb patterns are also seen for anatomical network complexity (i.e., complexity in the arrangement of bones and muscles). For instance, the human hindlimb is as complex as that of chimpanzees but the human forelimb is less complex than in Pan. Importantly, in contrast to the analysis of morphological integration using morphometric approaches, network analyses do not support the prediction that forelimb and hindlimb are more dissimilar in species with functionally divergent limbs such as bipedal humans.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25262-6
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rui Diogo
Julia L. Molnar
Campbell Rolian
Borja Esteve-Altava
spellingShingle Rui Diogo
Julia L. Molnar
Campbell Rolian
Borja Esteve-Altava
First anatomical network analysis of fore- and hindlimb musculoskeletal modularity in bonobos, common chimpanzees, and humans
Scientific Reports
author_facet Rui Diogo
Julia L. Molnar
Campbell Rolian
Borja Esteve-Altava
author_sort Rui Diogo
title First anatomical network analysis of fore- and hindlimb musculoskeletal modularity in bonobos, common chimpanzees, and humans
title_short First anatomical network analysis of fore- and hindlimb musculoskeletal modularity in bonobos, common chimpanzees, and humans
title_full First anatomical network analysis of fore- and hindlimb musculoskeletal modularity in bonobos, common chimpanzees, and humans
title_fullStr First anatomical network analysis of fore- and hindlimb musculoskeletal modularity in bonobos, common chimpanzees, and humans
title_full_unstemmed First anatomical network analysis of fore- and hindlimb musculoskeletal modularity in bonobos, common chimpanzees, and humans
title_sort first anatomical network analysis of fore- and hindlimb musculoskeletal modularity in bonobos, common chimpanzees, and humans
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2018-05-01
description Abstract Studies of morphological integration and modularity, and of anatomical complexity in human evolution typically focus on skeletal tissues. Here we provide the first network analysis of the musculoskeletal anatomy of both the fore- and hindlimbs of the two species of chimpanzee and humans. Contra long-accepted ideas, network analysis reveals that the hindlimb displays a pattern opposite to that of the forelimb: Pan big toe is typically seen as more independently mobile, but humans are actually the ones that have a separate module exclusively related to its movements. Different fore- vs hindlimb patterns are also seen for anatomical network complexity (i.e., complexity in the arrangement of bones and muscles). For instance, the human hindlimb is as complex as that of chimpanzees but the human forelimb is less complex than in Pan. Importantly, in contrast to the analysis of morphological integration using morphometric approaches, network analyses do not support the prediction that forelimb and hindlimb are more dissimilar in species with functionally divergent limbs such as bipedal humans.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25262-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ruidiogo firstanatomicalnetworkanalysisofforeandhindlimbmusculoskeletalmodularityinbonoboscommonchimpanzeesandhumans
AT julialmolnar firstanatomicalnetworkanalysisofforeandhindlimbmusculoskeletalmodularityinbonoboscommonchimpanzeesandhumans
AT campbellrolian firstanatomicalnetworkanalysisofforeandhindlimbmusculoskeletalmodularityinbonoboscommonchimpanzeesandhumans
AT borjaestevealtava firstanatomicalnetworkanalysisofforeandhindlimbmusculoskeletalmodularityinbonoboscommonchimpanzeesandhumans
_version_ 1724391504763420672