Comparison of how different feed phosphates affect performance, bone mineralization and phosphorus retention in broilers

The objective of this work was to evaluate the comparative P bio-avalability of different sources of phosphate based on their effects on animal performance, bones mineralization and mineral retention in broilers. To achieve this goal, two experiments were conducted. In Experiment 1, twenty diets wer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manel Hamdi, David Solà-Oriol, Rosa Franco-Rosselló, Rosa Aligué-Alemany, José F. Pérez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria 2017-12-01
Series:Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/sjar/article/view/11149
id doaj-445ed8caed38405c8ef3474bfaf18099
record_format Article
spelling doaj-445ed8caed38405c8ef3474bfaf180992020-11-24T23:21:43ZengInstituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y AlimentariaSpanish Journal of Agricultural Research2171-92922017-12-01153e0605e060510.5424/sjar/2017153-111492588Comparison of how different feed phosphates affect performance, bone mineralization and phosphorus retention in broilersManel Hamdi0David Solà-Oriol1Rosa Franco-Rosselló2Rosa Aligué-Alemany3José F. Pérez4Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Animal Nutrition and Welfare Service (SNiBA). Dept. de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, 08193 BellaterraUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Animal Nutrition and Welfare Service (SNiBA). Dept. de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, 08193 BellaterraUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Animal Nutrition and Welfare Service (SNiBA). Dept. de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, 08193 BellaterraUniversity of Barcelona, IDIBAPS. Dept. of Biomedical Sciences, 08036 BarcelonaUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Animal Nutrition and Welfare Service (SNiBA). Dept. de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, 08193 BellaterraThe objective of this work was to evaluate the comparative P bio-avalability of different sources of phosphate based on their effects on animal performance, bones mineralization and mineral retention in broilers. To achieve this goal, two experiments were conducted. In Experiment 1, twenty diets were prepared including five different phosphorus sources, either mono-calcium phosphate (MCP) or 4 different batches of di-calcium phosphate, to supplement non phytic P (NPP) levels at 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 and 4.5 g/kg in the diets. In Experiment 2, three treatments were used: the low MCP diet was deficient in NPP (3.1 g/kg for the starter phase and 2.8 g/kg for the grower phase); the high MCP diet and the high TCP (tri-calcium phosphate) diet included adequate levels of NPP (4.4-4.7 g/kg for the starter phase and 4.2-4.3 g/kg for the grower phase). Phytase was not added to experimental diets. Results of Exp. 1 indicated that an increase of NPP in the diet from 3.0 to 4.0 g/kg increased weight gain and feed intake between d 1 and d 21 (Trial 1). Alternatively, tibia weight and ash percentage at d 21 responded up to the level of 4.5 g/kg and showed significant difference with birds of the 4.0 g/kg NPP group. In Trial 2, chickens fed with the high MCP and TCP had improved growth performances and bone mineralization. No differences were observed on the P availability among different mineral P sources. A level of 4.5 g/kg, NPP is recommended when phytase is not included to maximize both performance and bone mineralization in broiler chickens up to d 21.http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/sjar/article/view/11149mineralizationdigestibilitycalciumphosphorus sources
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Manel Hamdi
David Solà-Oriol
Rosa Franco-Rosselló
Rosa Aligué-Alemany
José F. Pérez
spellingShingle Manel Hamdi
David Solà-Oriol
Rosa Franco-Rosselló
Rosa Aligué-Alemany
José F. Pérez
Comparison of how different feed phosphates affect performance, bone mineralization and phosphorus retention in broilers
Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research
mineralization
digestibility
calcium
phosphorus sources
author_facet Manel Hamdi
David Solà-Oriol
Rosa Franco-Rosselló
Rosa Aligué-Alemany
José F. Pérez
author_sort Manel Hamdi
title Comparison of how different feed phosphates affect performance, bone mineralization and phosphorus retention in broilers
title_short Comparison of how different feed phosphates affect performance, bone mineralization and phosphorus retention in broilers
title_full Comparison of how different feed phosphates affect performance, bone mineralization and phosphorus retention in broilers
title_fullStr Comparison of how different feed phosphates affect performance, bone mineralization and phosphorus retention in broilers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of how different feed phosphates affect performance, bone mineralization and phosphorus retention in broilers
title_sort comparison of how different feed phosphates affect performance, bone mineralization and phosphorus retention in broilers
publisher Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria
series Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research
issn 2171-9292
publishDate 2017-12-01
description The objective of this work was to evaluate the comparative P bio-avalability of different sources of phosphate based on their effects on animal performance, bones mineralization and mineral retention in broilers. To achieve this goal, two experiments were conducted. In Experiment 1, twenty diets were prepared including five different phosphorus sources, either mono-calcium phosphate (MCP) or 4 different batches of di-calcium phosphate, to supplement non phytic P (NPP) levels at 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 and 4.5 g/kg in the diets. In Experiment 2, three treatments were used: the low MCP diet was deficient in NPP (3.1 g/kg for the starter phase and 2.8 g/kg for the grower phase); the high MCP diet and the high TCP (tri-calcium phosphate) diet included adequate levels of NPP (4.4-4.7 g/kg for the starter phase and 4.2-4.3 g/kg for the grower phase). Phytase was not added to experimental diets. Results of Exp. 1 indicated that an increase of NPP in the diet from 3.0 to 4.0 g/kg increased weight gain and feed intake between d 1 and d 21 (Trial 1). Alternatively, tibia weight and ash percentage at d 21 responded up to the level of 4.5 g/kg and showed significant difference with birds of the 4.0 g/kg NPP group. In Trial 2, chickens fed with the high MCP and TCP had improved growth performances and bone mineralization. No differences were observed on the P availability among different mineral P sources. A level of 4.5 g/kg, NPP is recommended when phytase is not included to maximize both performance and bone mineralization in broiler chickens up to d 21.
topic mineralization
digestibility
calcium
phosphorus sources
url http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/sjar/article/view/11149
work_keys_str_mv AT manelhamdi comparisonofhowdifferentfeedphosphatesaffectperformancebonemineralizationandphosphorusretentioninbroilers
AT davidsolaoriol comparisonofhowdifferentfeedphosphatesaffectperformancebonemineralizationandphosphorusretentioninbroilers
AT rosafrancorossello comparisonofhowdifferentfeedphosphatesaffectperformancebonemineralizationandphosphorusretentioninbroilers
AT rosaaliguealemany comparisonofhowdifferentfeedphosphatesaffectperformancebonemineralizationandphosphorusretentioninbroilers
AT josefperez comparisonofhowdifferentfeedphosphatesaffectperformancebonemineralizationandphosphorusretentioninbroilers
_version_ 1725570359150772224