Randomized Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Epoetin Alfa-epbx Versus Epoetin Alfa in End-Stage Kidney Disease
Introduction: This double-blind, randomized controlled trial compared the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous epoetin alfa-epbx, an epoetin alfa biosimilar, with the reference product, epoetin alfa, in hemodialysis patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and anemia who were receiving epoetin a...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2019-09-01
|
Series: | Kidney International Reports |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468024919302050 |
id |
doaj-445bc210f8f64851b7ff9049a1a16833 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-445bc210f8f64851b7ff9049a1a168332020-11-25T01:54:19ZengElsevierKidney International Reports2468-02492019-09-014912351247Randomized Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Epoetin Alfa-epbx Versus Epoetin Alfa in End-Stage Kidney DiseaseSteven Fishbane0Bruce S. Spinowitz1Wayne A. Wisemandle2Nancy E. Martin3Department of Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Great Neck, New York, USA; Correspondence: Steven Fishbane, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 100 Community Drive, Great Neck, New York 11021, USA.Division of Nephrology, New York Presbyterian Queens, Flushing, New York, USAGlobal Clinical Development, Hospira, Inc, a Pfizer company, Lake Forest, Illinois, USAGlobal Clinical Development, Hospira, Inc, a Pfizer company, Lake Forest, Illinois, USAIntroduction: This double-blind, randomized controlled trial compared the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous epoetin alfa-epbx, an epoetin alfa biosimilar, with the reference product, epoetin alfa, in hemodialysis patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and anemia who were receiving epoetin alfa maintenance treatment. Methods: Eligible patients (n = 320) were randomized (1:1) to subcutaneous epoetin alfa-epbx or epoetin alfa in a titration phase; patients who demonstrated stable subcutaneous dosing (n = 246) were re-randomized to receive subcutaneous epoetin alfa-epbx or epoetin alfa 1 to 3 times per week in a 16-week maintenance phase. Co-primary endpoints were least-squares mean difference between treatments in mean weekly hemoglobin concentration and mean weekly epoetin dose per kilogram body weight (BW) during the last 4 weeks of treatment in the maintenance phase. Results: The least-squares mean difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) between treatments in weekly hemoglobin was 0.04 g/dl (−0.17 to 0.24 g/dl) and weekly epoetin dose/kg BW was −2.34 U/kg per week (−14.51 to 9.82 U/kg per week). The 95% CIs were contained within the prespecified equivalence margins of ±0.5 g/dl (weekly hemoglobin) and ±45 U/kg per week (weekly epoetin dose/kg BW). In the epoetin alfa-epbx and epoetin alfa groups, respectively, 4.0% and 4.1% of patients required blood transfusions, 69.7% and 70.5% reported adverse events, 18.9% and 27.0% reported serious adverse events, and 3 and 2 deaths were reported. Five patients were confirmed positive for anti-recombinant human erythropoietin antibody, 2 of whom tested positive at baseline. All patients tested negative for neutralizing antibodies. Conclusions: This comparative clinical trial demonstrated equivalence in efficacy and similar safety of subcutaneously administered epoetin alfa-epbx to epoetin alfa. Keywords: biosimilar, efficacy, end-stage kidney disease, epoetin alfa, subcutaneous administration, safetyhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468024919302050 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Steven Fishbane Bruce S. Spinowitz Wayne A. Wisemandle Nancy E. Martin |
spellingShingle |
Steven Fishbane Bruce S. Spinowitz Wayne A. Wisemandle Nancy E. Martin Randomized Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Epoetin Alfa-epbx Versus Epoetin Alfa in End-Stage Kidney Disease Kidney International Reports |
author_facet |
Steven Fishbane Bruce S. Spinowitz Wayne A. Wisemandle Nancy E. Martin |
author_sort |
Steven Fishbane |
title |
Randomized Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Epoetin Alfa-epbx Versus Epoetin Alfa in End-Stage Kidney Disease |
title_short |
Randomized Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Epoetin Alfa-epbx Versus Epoetin Alfa in End-Stage Kidney Disease |
title_full |
Randomized Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Epoetin Alfa-epbx Versus Epoetin Alfa in End-Stage Kidney Disease |
title_fullStr |
Randomized Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Epoetin Alfa-epbx Versus Epoetin Alfa in End-Stage Kidney Disease |
title_full_unstemmed |
Randomized Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Epoetin Alfa-epbx Versus Epoetin Alfa in End-Stage Kidney Disease |
title_sort |
randomized controlled trial of subcutaneous epoetin alfa-epbx versus epoetin alfa in end-stage kidney disease |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Kidney International Reports |
issn |
2468-0249 |
publishDate |
2019-09-01 |
description |
Introduction: This double-blind, randomized controlled trial compared the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous epoetin alfa-epbx, an epoetin alfa biosimilar, with the reference product, epoetin alfa, in hemodialysis patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and anemia who were receiving epoetin alfa maintenance treatment. Methods: Eligible patients (n = 320) were randomized (1:1) to subcutaneous epoetin alfa-epbx or epoetin alfa in a titration phase; patients who demonstrated stable subcutaneous dosing (n = 246) were re-randomized to receive subcutaneous epoetin alfa-epbx or epoetin alfa 1 to 3 times per week in a 16-week maintenance phase. Co-primary endpoints were least-squares mean difference between treatments in mean weekly hemoglobin concentration and mean weekly epoetin dose per kilogram body weight (BW) during the last 4 weeks of treatment in the maintenance phase. Results: The least-squares mean difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) between treatments in weekly hemoglobin was 0.04 g/dl (−0.17 to 0.24 g/dl) and weekly epoetin dose/kg BW was −2.34 U/kg per week (−14.51 to 9.82 U/kg per week). The 95% CIs were contained within the prespecified equivalence margins of ±0.5 g/dl (weekly hemoglobin) and ±45 U/kg per week (weekly epoetin dose/kg BW). In the epoetin alfa-epbx and epoetin alfa groups, respectively, 4.0% and 4.1% of patients required blood transfusions, 69.7% and 70.5% reported adverse events, 18.9% and 27.0% reported serious adverse events, and 3 and 2 deaths were reported. Five patients were confirmed positive for anti-recombinant human erythropoietin antibody, 2 of whom tested positive at baseline. All patients tested negative for neutralizing antibodies. Conclusions: This comparative clinical trial demonstrated equivalence in efficacy and similar safety of subcutaneously administered epoetin alfa-epbx to epoetin alfa. Keywords: biosimilar, efficacy, end-stage kidney disease, epoetin alfa, subcutaneous administration, safety |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468024919302050 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stevenfishbane randomizedcontrolledtrialofsubcutaneousepoetinalfaepbxversusepoetinalfainendstagekidneydisease AT brucesspinowitz randomizedcontrolledtrialofsubcutaneousepoetinalfaepbxversusepoetinalfainendstagekidneydisease AT wayneawisemandle randomizedcontrolledtrialofsubcutaneousepoetinalfaepbxversusepoetinalfainendstagekidneydisease AT nancyemartin randomizedcontrolledtrialofsubcutaneousepoetinalfaepbxversusepoetinalfainendstagekidneydisease |
_version_ |
1724987834632241152 |