Randomized Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Epoetin Alfa-epbx Versus Epoetin Alfa in End-Stage Kidney Disease

Introduction: This double-blind, randomized controlled trial compared the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous epoetin alfa-epbx, an epoetin alfa biosimilar, with the reference product, epoetin alfa, in hemodialysis patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and anemia who were receiving epoetin a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Steven Fishbane, Bruce S. Spinowitz, Wayne A. Wisemandle, Nancy E. Martin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-09-01
Series:Kidney International Reports
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468024919302050
id doaj-445bc210f8f64851b7ff9049a1a16833
record_format Article
spelling doaj-445bc210f8f64851b7ff9049a1a168332020-11-25T01:54:19ZengElsevierKidney International Reports2468-02492019-09-014912351247Randomized Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Epoetin Alfa-epbx Versus Epoetin Alfa in End-Stage Kidney DiseaseSteven Fishbane0Bruce S. Spinowitz1Wayne A. Wisemandle2Nancy E. Martin3Department of Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Great Neck, New York, USA; Correspondence: Steven Fishbane, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 100 Community Drive, Great Neck, New York 11021, USA.Division of Nephrology, New York Presbyterian Queens, Flushing, New York, USAGlobal Clinical Development, Hospira, Inc, a Pfizer company, Lake Forest, Illinois, USAGlobal Clinical Development, Hospira, Inc, a Pfizer company, Lake Forest, Illinois, USAIntroduction: This double-blind, randomized controlled trial compared the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous epoetin alfa-epbx, an epoetin alfa biosimilar, with the reference product, epoetin alfa, in hemodialysis patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and anemia who were receiving epoetin alfa maintenance treatment. Methods: Eligible patients (n = 320) were randomized (1:1) to subcutaneous epoetin alfa-epbx or epoetin alfa in a titration phase; patients who demonstrated stable subcutaneous dosing (n = 246) were re-randomized to receive subcutaneous epoetin alfa-epbx or epoetin alfa 1 to 3 times per week in a 16-week maintenance phase. Co-primary endpoints were least-squares mean difference between treatments in mean weekly hemoglobin concentration and mean weekly epoetin dose per kilogram body weight (BW) during the last 4 weeks of treatment in the maintenance phase. Results: The least-squares mean difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) between treatments in weekly hemoglobin was 0.04 g/dl (−0.17 to 0.24 g/dl) and weekly epoetin dose/kg BW was −2.34 U/kg per week (−14.51 to 9.82 U/kg per week). The 95% CIs were contained within the prespecified equivalence margins of ±0.5 g/dl (weekly hemoglobin) and ±45 U/kg per week (weekly epoetin dose/kg BW). In the epoetin alfa-epbx and epoetin alfa groups, respectively, 4.0% and 4.1% of patients required blood transfusions, 69.7% and 70.5% reported adverse events, 18.9% and 27.0% reported serious adverse events, and 3 and 2 deaths were reported. Five patients were confirmed positive for anti-recombinant human erythropoietin antibody, 2 of whom tested positive at baseline. All patients tested negative for neutralizing antibodies. Conclusions: This comparative clinical trial demonstrated equivalence in efficacy and similar safety of subcutaneously administered epoetin alfa-epbx to epoetin alfa. Keywords: biosimilar, efficacy, end-stage kidney disease, epoetin alfa, subcutaneous administration, safetyhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468024919302050
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Steven Fishbane
Bruce S. Spinowitz
Wayne A. Wisemandle
Nancy E. Martin
spellingShingle Steven Fishbane
Bruce S. Spinowitz
Wayne A. Wisemandle
Nancy E. Martin
Randomized Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Epoetin Alfa-epbx Versus Epoetin Alfa in End-Stage Kidney Disease
Kidney International Reports
author_facet Steven Fishbane
Bruce S. Spinowitz
Wayne A. Wisemandle
Nancy E. Martin
author_sort Steven Fishbane
title Randomized Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Epoetin Alfa-epbx Versus Epoetin Alfa in End-Stage Kidney Disease
title_short Randomized Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Epoetin Alfa-epbx Versus Epoetin Alfa in End-Stage Kidney Disease
title_full Randomized Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Epoetin Alfa-epbx Versus Epoetin Alfa in End-Stage Kidney Disease
title_fullStr Randomized Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Epoetin Alfa-epbx Versus Epoetin Alfa in End-Stage Kidney Disease
title_full_unstemmed Randomized Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Epoetin Alfa-epbx Versus Epoetin Alfa in End-Stage Kidney Disease
title_sort randomized controlled trial of subcutaneous epoetin alfa-epbx versus epoetin alfa in end-stage kidney disease
publisher Elsevier
series Kidney International Reports
issn 2468-0249
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Introduction: This double-blind, randomized controlled trial compared the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous epoetin alfa-epbx, an epoetin alfa biosimilar, with the reference product, epoetin alfa, in hemodialysis patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and anemia who were receiving epoetin alfa maintenance treatment. Methods: Eligible patients (n = 320) were randomized (1:1) to subcutaneous epoetin alfa-epbx or epoetin alfa in a titration phase; patients who demonstrated stable subcutaneous dosing (n = 246) were re-randomized to receive subcutaneous epoetin alfa-epbx or epoetin alfa 1 to 3 times per week in a 16-week maintenance phase. Co-primary endpoints were least-squares mean difference between treatments in mean weekly hemoglobin concentration and mean weekly epoetin dose per kilogram body weight (BW) during the last 4 weeks of treatment in the maintenance phase. Results: The least-squares mean difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) between treatments in weekly hemoglobin was 0.04 g/dl (−0.17 to 0.24 g/dl) and weekly epoetin dose/kg BW was −2.34 U/kg per week (−14.51 to 9.82 U/kg per week). The 95% CIs were contained within the prespecified equivalence margins of ±0.5 g/dl (weekly hemoglobin) and ±45 U/kg per week (weekly epoetin dose/kg BW). In the epoetin alfa-epbx and epoetin alfa groups, respectively, 4.0% and 4.1% of patients required blood transfusions, 69.7% and 70.5% reported adverse events, 18.9% and 27.0% reported serious adverse events, and 3 and 2 deaths were reported. Five patients were confirmed positive for anti-recombinant human erythropoietin antibody, 2 of whom tested positive at baseline. All patients tested negative for neutralizing antibodies. Conclusions: This comparative clinical trial demonstrated equivalence in efficacy and similar safety of subcutaneously administered epoetin alfa-epbx to epoetin alfa. Keywords: biosimilar, efficacy, end-stage kidney disease, epoetin alfa, subcutaneous administration, safety
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468024919302050
work_keys_str_mv AT stevenfishbane randomizedcontrolledtrialofsubcutaneousepoetinalfaepbxversusepoetinalfainendstagekidneydisease
AT brucesspinowitz randomizedcontrolledtrialofsubcutaneousepoetinalfaepbxversusepoetinalfainendstagekidneydisease
AT wayneawisemandle randomizedcontrolledtrialofsubcutaneousepoetinalfaepbxversusepoetinalfainendstagekidneydisease
AT nancyemartin randomizedcontrolledtrialofsubcutaneousepoetinalfaepbxversusepoetinalfainendstagekidneydisease
_version_ 1724987834632241152