A Complex Network Framework to Model Cognition: Unveiling Correlation Structures from Connectivity

Several approaches to cognition and intelligence research rely on statistics-based model testing, namely, factor analysis. In the present work, we exploit the emerging dynamical system perspective putting the focus on the role of the network topology underlying the relationships between cognitive pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gemma Rosell-Tarragó, Emanuele Cozzo, Albert Díaz-Guilera
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi-Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:Complexity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1918753
id doaj-445b6f06a2914778901457261f909c7e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-445b6f06a2914778901457261f909c7e2020-11-24T21:35:58ZengHindawi-WileyComplexity1076-27871099-05262018-01-01201810.1155/2018/19187531918753A Complex Network Framework to Model Cognition: Unveiling Correlation Structures from ConnectivityGemma Rosell-Tarragó0Emanuele Cozzo1Albert Díaz-Guilera2Departament de Física de la Matèria Condensada, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, SpainDepartament de Física de la Matèria Condensada, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, SpainDepartament de Física de la Matèria Condensada, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, SpainSeveral approaches to cognition and intelligence research rely on statistics-based model testing, namely, factor analysis. In the present work, we exploit the emerging dynamical system perspective putting the focus on the role of the network topology underlying the relationships between cognitive processes. We go through a couple of models of distinct cognitive phenomena and yet find the conditions for them to be mathematically equivalent. We find a nontrivial attractor of the system that corresponds to the exact definition of a well-known network centrality and hence stresses the interplay between the dynamics and the underlying network connectivity, showing that both of the two are relevant. Correlation matrices evince there must be a meaningful structure underlying real data. Nevertheless, the true architecture regarding the connectivity between cognitive processes is still a burning issue of research. Regardless of the network considered, it is always possible to recover a positive manifold of correlations. Furthermore, we show that different network topologies lead to different plausible statistical models concerning the correlation structure, ranging from one to multiple factor models and richer correlation structures.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1918753
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gemma Rosell-Tarragó
Emanuele Cozzo
Albert Díaz-Guilera
spellingShingle Gemma Rosell-Tarragó
Emanuele Cozzo
Albert Díaz-Guilera
A Complex Network Framework to Model Cognition: Unveiling Correlation Structures from Connectivity
Complexity
author_facet Gemma Rosell-Tarragó
Emanuele Cozzo
Albert Díaz-Guilera
author_sort Gemma Rosell-Tarragó
title A Complex Network Framework to Model Cognition: Unveiling Correlation Structures from Connectivity
title_short A Complex Network Framework to Model Cognition: Unveiling Correlation Structures from Connectivity
title_full A Complex Network Framework to Model Cognition: Unveiling Correlation Structures from Connectivity
title_fullStr A Complex Network Framework to Model Cognition: Unveiling Correlation Structures from Connectivity
title_full_unstemmed A Complex Network Framework to Model Cognition: Unveiling Correlation Structures from Connectivity
title_sort complex network framework to model cognition: unveiling correlation structures from connectivity
publisher Hindawi-Wiley
series Complexity
issn 1076-2787
1099-0526
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Several approaches to cognition and intelligence research rely on statistics-based model testing, namely, factor analysis. In the present work, we exploit the emerging dynamical system perspective putting the focus on the role of the network topology underlying the relationships between cognitive processes. We go through a couple of models of distinct cognitive phenomena and yet find the conditions for them to be mathematically equivalent. We find a nontrivial attractor of the system that corresponds to the exact definition of a well-known network centrality and hence stresses the interplay between the dynamics and the underlying network connectivity, showing that both of the two are relevant. Correlation matrices evince there must be a meaningful structure underlying real data. Nevertheless, the true architecture regarding the connectivity between cognitive processes is still a burning issue of research. Regardless of the network considered, it is always possible to recover a positive manifold of correlations. Furthermore, we show that different network topologies lead to different plausible statistical models concerning the correlation structure, ranging from one to multiple factor models and richer correlation structures.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1918753
work_keys_str_mv AT gemmaroselltarrago acomplexnetworkframeworktomodelcognitionunveilingcorrelationstructuresfromconnectivity
AT emanuelecozzo acomplexnetworkframeworktomodelcognitionunveilingcorrelationstructuresfromconnectivity
AT albertdiazguilera acomplexnetworkframeworktomodelcognitionunveilingcorrelationstructuresfromconnectivity
AT gemmaroselltarrago complexnetworkframeworktomodelcognitionunveilingcorrelationstructuresfromconnectivity
AT emanuelecozzo complexnetworkframeworktomodelcognitionunveilingcorrelationstructuresfromconnectivity
AT albertdiazguilera complexnetworkframeworktomodelcognitionunveilingcorrelationstructuresfromconnectivity
_version_ 1725943041474166784