A Complex Network Framework to Model Cognition: Unveiling Correlation Structures from Connectivity
Several approaches to cognition and intelligence research rely on statistics-based model testing, namely, factor analysis. In the present work, we exploit the emerging dynamical system perspective putting the focus on the role of the network topology underlying the relationships between cognitive pr...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi-Wiley
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Complexity |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1918753 |
id |
doaj-445b6f06a2914778901457261f909c7e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-445b6f06a2914778901457261f909c7e2020-11-24T21:35:58ZengHindawi-WileyComplexity1076-27871099-05262018-01-01201810.1155/2018/19187531918753A Complex Network Framework to Model Cognition: Unveiling Correlation Structures from ConnectivityGemma Rosell-Tarragó0Emanuele Cozzo1Albert Díaz-Guilera2Departament de Física de la Matèria Condensada, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, SpainDepartament de Física de la Matèria Condensada, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, SpainDepartament de Física de la Matèria Condensada, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, SpainSeveral approaches to cognition and intelligence research rely on statistics-based model testing, namely, factor analysis. In the present work, we exploit the emerging dynamical system perspective putting the focus on the role of the network topology underlying the relationships between cognitive processes. We go through a couple of models of distinct cognitive phenomena and yet find the conditions for them to be mathematically equivalent. We find a nontrivial attractor of the system that corresponds to the exact definition of a well-known network centrality and hence stresses the interplay between the dynamics and the underlying network connectivity, showing that both of the two are relevant. Correlation matrices evince there must be a meaningful structure underlying real data. Nevertheless, the true architecture regarding the connectivity between cognitive processes is still a burning issue of research. Regardless of the network considered, it is always possible to recover a positive manifold of correlations. Furthermore, we show that different network topologies lead to different plausible statistical models concerning the correlation structure, ranging from one to multiple factor models and richer correlation structures.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1918753 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gemma Rosell-Tarragó Emanuele Cozzo Albert Díaz-Guilera |
spellingShingle |
Gemma Rosell-Tarragó Emanuele Cozzo Albert Díaz-Guilera A Complex Network Framework to Model Cognition: Unveiling Correlation Structures from Connectivity Complexity |
author_facet |
Gemma Rosell-Tarragó Emanuele Cozzo Albert Díaz-Guilera |
author_sort |
Gemma Rosell-Tarragó |
title |
A Complex Network Framework to Model Cognition: Unveiling Correlation Structures from Connectivity |
title_short |
A Complex Network Framework to Model Cognition: Unveiling Correlation Structures from Connectivity |
title_full |
A Complex Network Framework to Model Cognition: Unveiling Correlation Structures from Connectivity |
title_fullStr |
A Complex Network Framework to Model Cognition: Unveiling Correlation Structures from Connectivity |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Complex Network Framework to Model Cognition: Unveiling Correlation Structures from Connectivity |
title_sort |
complex network framework to model cognition: unveiling correlation structures from connectivity |
publisher |
Hindawi-Wiley |
series |
Complexity |
issn |
1076-2787 1099-0526 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Several approaches to cognition and intelligence research rely on statistics-based model testing, namely, factor analysis. In the present work, we exploit the emerging dynamical system perspective putting the focus on the role of the network topology underlying the relationships between cognitive processes. We go through a couple of models of distinct cognitive phenomena and yet find the conditions for them to be mathematically equivalent. We find a nontrivial attractor of the system that corresponds to the exact definition of a well-known network centrality and hence stresses the interplay between the dynamics and the underlying network connectivity, showing that both of the two are relevant. Correlation matrices evince there must be a meaningful structure underlying real data. Nevertheless, the true architecture regarding the connectivity between cognitive processes is still a burning issue of research. Regardless of the network considered, it is always possible to recover a positive manifold of correlations. Furthermore, we show that different network topologies lead to different plausible statistical models concerning the correlation structure, ranging from one to multiple factor models and richer correlation structures. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1918753 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gemmaroselltarrago acomplexnetworkframeworktomodelcognitionunveilingcorrelationstructuresfromconnectivity AT emanuelecozzo acomplexnetworkframeworktomodelcognitionunveilingcorrelationstructuresfromconnectivity AT albertdiazguilera acomplexnetworkframeworktomodelcognitionunveilingcorrelationstructuresfromconnectivity AT gemmaroselltarrago complexnetworkframeworktomodelcognitionunveilingcorrelationstructuresfromconnectivity AT emanuelecozzo complexnetworkframeworktomodelcognitionunveilingcorrelationstructuresfromconnectivity AT albertdiazguilera complexnetworkframeworktomodelcognitionunveilingcorrelationstructuresfromconnectivity |
_version_ |
1725943041474166784 |