Comparison of Soil EC Values from Methods Based on 1:1 and 1:5 Soil to Water Ratios and EC<sub>e</sub> from Saturated Paste Extract Based Method

The present study investigates the effect of three different methods of obtaining 1:1 and 1:5 soil-over-water mass ratios (soil:water) extracts for soil electrical conductivity (EC) measurements (EC<sub>1:1</sub>, EC<sub>1:5</sub>). On the same soil samples, also the electric...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: George Kargas, Paraskevi Londra, Anastasia Sgoubopoulou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-04-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/4/1010
id doaj-4450308c88064f3bae8102a0365a7b4b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4450308c88064f3bae8102a0365a7b4b2020-11-25T03:01:16ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412020-04-01121010101010.3390/w12041010Comparison of Soil EC Values from Methods Based on 1:1 and 1:5 Soil to Water Ratios and EC<sub>e</sub> from Saturated Paste Extract Based MethodGeorge Kargas0Paraskevi Londra1Anastasia Sgoubopoulou2Laboratory of Agricultural Hydraulics, Department of Natural Resources Management and Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, 11855 Athens, GreeceLaboratory of Agricultural Hydraulics, Department of Natural Resources Management and Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, 11855 Athens, GreeceLaboratory of Agricultural Hydraulics, Department of Natural Resources Management and Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, 11855 Athens, GreeceThe present study investigates the effect of three different methods of obtaining 1:1 and 1:5 soil-over-water mass ratios (soil:water) extracts for soil electrical conductivity (EC) measurements (EC<sub>1:1</sub>, EC<sub>1:5</sub>). On the same soil samples, also the electrical conductivity of the saturated paste extract (EC<sub>e</sub>) was determined and the relationships between EC<sub>e</sub> and each of the three of EC<sub>1:1</sub> and EC<sub>1:5</sub> values were examined. The soil samples used were collected from three areas over Greece (Laconia, Argolida and Kos) and had EC<sub>e</sub> values ranging from 0.611 to 25.9 dS m<sup>−1</sup>. From the results, it was shown that for soils with EC<sub>e</sub> < 3 dS m<sup>−1</sup> the higher EC values were obtained by the method where the suspension remained at rest for 23 hours and then shaken mechanically for 1 h. On the contrary, no differences were observed among the three methods for soils with EC<sub>e</sub> > 3 dS m<sup>−1</sup>. Also, in the case of EC<sub>1:5</sub>, the optimal times for equilibration were much longer when EC<sub>e</sub> < 3 dS m<sup>−1</sup>. Across all soils, the relationships between EC<sub>e</sub> and each of three methods of obtaining EC<sub>1:1</sub> and EC<sub>1:5</sub> were strongly linear (0.953 < R<sup>2</sup> < 0.991 and 0.63 < RMSE < 1.27 dS m<sup>−1</sup>). Taking into account the threshold of EC<sub>e</sub> = 3 dS m<sup>−1</sup>, different EC<sub>e</sub> = f(EC<sub>1:5</sub>) linear relationships were obtained. Although the linear model gave high values of R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE for EC<sub>e</sub> < 3 dS m<sup>−1</sup>, the quadratic model resulted in better R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE values for all methods examined. Correspondingly, in the 1:1 method, two of the three methods used exhibited similar slope values of the linear relationships independent of EC<sub>e</sub> value (EC<sub>e</sub> < 3 or EC<sub>e</sub> > 3 dS m<sup>−1</sup>), while one method (23 h rest and then shaken mechanically for 1 hour) showed significant differences in the slopes of the linear relationships between the two ranges of EC<sub>e</sub>.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/4/1010saturated soil pasteelectrical conductivitysalinity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author George Kargas
Paraskevi Londra
Anastasia Sgoubopoulou
spellingShingle George Kargas
Paraskevi Londra
Anastasia Sgoubopoulou
Comparison of Soil EC Values from Methods Based on 1:1 and 1:5 Soil to Water Ratios and EC<sub>e</sub> from Saturated Paste Extract Based Method
Water
saturated soil paste
electrical conductivity
salinity
author_facet George Kargas
Paraskevi Londra
Anastasia Sgoubopoulou
author_sort George Kargas
title Comparison of Soil EC Values from Methods Based on 1:1 and 1:5 Soil to Water Ratios and EC<sub>e</sub> from Saturated Paste Extract Based Method
title_short Comparison of Soil EC Values from Methods Based on 1:1 and 1:5 Soil to Water Ratios and EC<sub>e</sub> from Saturated Paste Extract Based Method
title_full Comparison of Soil EC Values from Methods Based on 1:1 and 1:5 Soil to Water Ratios and EC<sub>e</sub> from Saturated Paste Extract Based Method
title_fullStr Comparison of Soil EC Values from Methods Based on 1:1 and 1:5 Soil to Water Ratios and EC<sub>e</sub> from Saturated Paste Extract Based Method
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Soil EC Values from Methods Based on 1:1 and 1:5 Soil to Water Ratios and EC<sub>e</sub> from Saturated Paste Extract Based Method
title_sort comparison of soil ec values from methods based on 1:1 and 1:5 soil to water ratios and ec<sub>e</sub> from saturated paste extract based method
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2020-04-01
description The present study investigates the effect of three different methods of obtaining 1:1 and 1:5 soil-over-water mass ratios (soil:water) extracts for soil electrical conductivity (EC) measurements (EC<sub>1:1</sub>, EC<sub>1:5</sub>). On the same soil samples, also the electrical conductivity of the saturated paste extract (EC<sub>e</sub>) was determined and the relationships between EC<sub>e</sub> and each of the three of EC<sub>1:1</sub> and EC<sub>1:5</sub> values were examined. The soil samples used were collected from three areas over Greece (Laconia, Argolida and Kos) and had EC<sub>e</sub> values ranging from 0.611 to 25.9 dS m<sup>−1</sup>. From the results, it was shown that for soils with EC<sub>e</sub> < 3 dS m<sup>−1</sup> the higher EC values were obtained by the method where the suspension remained at rest for 23 hours and then shaken mechanically for 1 h. On the contrary, no differences were observed among the three methods for soils with EC<sub>e</sub> > 3 dS m<sup>−1</sup>. Also, in the case of EC<sub>1:5</sub>, the optimal times for equilibration were much longer when EC<sub>e</sub> < 3 dS m<sup>−1</sup>. Across all soils, the relationships between EC<sub>e</sub> and each of three methods of obtaining EC<sub>1:1</sub> and EC<sub>1:5</sub> were strongly linear (0.953 < R<sup>2</sup> < 0.991 and 0.63 < RMSE < 1.27 dS m<sup>−1</sup>). Taking into account the threshold of EC<sub>e</sub> = 3 dS m<sup>−1</sup>, different EC<sub>e</sub> = f(EC<sub>1:5</sub>) linear relationships were obtained. Although the linear model gave high values of R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE for EC<sub>e</sub> < 3 dS m<sup>−1</sup>, the quadratic model resulted in better R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE values for all methods examined. Correspondingly, in the 1:1 method, two of the three methods used exhibited similar slope values of the linear relationships independent of EC<sub>e</sub> value (EC<sub>e</sub> < 3 or EC<sub>e</sub> > 3 dS m<sup>−1</sup>), while one method (23 h rest and then shaken mechanically for 1 hour) showed significant differences in the slopes of the linear relationships between the two ranges of EC<sub>e</sub>.
topic saturated soil paste
electrical conductivity
salinity
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/4/1010
work_keys_str_mv AT georgekargas comparisonofsoilecvaluesfrommethodsbasedon11and15soiltowaterratiosandecsubesubfromsaturatedpasteextractbasedmethod
AT paraskevilondra comparisonofsoilecvaluesfrommethodsbasedon11and15soiltowaterratiosandecsubesubfromsaturatedpasteextractbasedmethod
AT anastasiasgoubopoulou comparisonofsoilecvaluesfrommethodsbasedon11and15soiltowaterratiosandecsubesubfromsaturatedpasteextractbasedmethod
_version_ 1724694037579956224