Summary: | The present study investigates the effect of three different methods of obtaining 1:1 and 1:5 soil-over-water mass ratios (soil:water) extracts for soil electrical conductivity (EC) measurements (EC<sub>1:1</sub>, EC<sub>1:5</sub>). On the same soil samples, also the electrical conductivity of the saturated paste extract (EC<sub>e</sub>) was determined and the relationships between EC<sub>e</sub> and each of the three of EC<sub>1:1</sub> and EC<sub>1:5</sub> values were examined. The soil samples used were collected from three areas over Greece (Laconia, Argolida and Kos) and had EC<sub>e</sub> values ranging from 0.611 to 25.9 dS m<sup>−1</sup>. From the results, it was shown that for soils with EC<sub>e</sub> < 3 dS m<sup>−1</sup> the higher EC values were obtained by the method where the suspension remained at rest for 23 hours and then shaken mechanically for 1 h. On the contrary, no differences were observed among the three methods for soils with EC<sub>e</sub> > 3 dS m<sup>−1</sup>. Also, in the case of EC<sub>1:5</sub>, the optimal times for equilibration were much longer when EC<sub>e</sub> < 3 dS m<sup>−1</sup>. Across all soils, the relationships between EC<sub>e</sub> and each of three methods of obtaining EC<sub>1:1</sub> and EC<sub>1:5</sub> were strongly linear (0.953 < R<sup>2</sup> < 0.991 and 0.63 < RMSE < 1.27 dS m<sup>−1</sup>). Taking into account the threshold of EC<sub>e</sub> = 3 dS m<sup>−1</sup>, different EC<sub>e</sub> = f(EC<sub>1:5</sub>) linear relationships were obtained. Although the linear model gave high values of R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE for EC<sub>e</sub> < 3 dS m<sup>−1</sup>, the quadratic model resulted in better R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE values for all methods examined. Correspondingly, in the 1:1 method, two of the three methods used exhibited similar slope values of the linear relationships independent of EC<sub>e</sub> value (EC<sub>e</sub> < 3 or EC<sub>e</sub> > 3 dS m<sup>−1</sup>), while one method (23 h rest and then shaken mechanically for 1 hour) showed significant differences in the slopes of the linear relationships between the two ranges of EC<sub>e</sub>.
|