Post-Mortem Pedagogy: A Brief History of the Practice of Anatomical Dissection

Anatomical dissection is almost ubiquitous in modern medical education, masking a complex history of its practice. Dissection with the express purpose of understanding human anatomy began more than two millennia ago with Herophilus, but was soon after disavowed in the third century BCE. Historical e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Connor T. A. Brenna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rambam Health Care Campus 2021-01-01
Series:Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.rmmj.org.il/issues/48/1152/manuscript
id doaj-4410d296c7044d37ad4e22ca2ac6f6a5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4410d296c7044d37ad4e22ca2ac6f6a52021-01-27T11:44:30ZengRambam Health Care CampusRambam Maimonides Medical Journal2076-91722021-01-01121e000810.5041/RMMJ.10423Post-Mortem Pedagogy: A Brief History of the Practice of Anatomical DissectionConnor T. A. Brenna0Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaAnatomical dissection is almost ubiquitous in modern medical education, masking a complex history of its practice. Dissection with the express purpose of understanding human anatomy began more than two millennia ago with Herophilus, but was soon after disavowed in the third century BCE. Historical evidence suggests that this position was based on common beliefs that the body must remain whole after death in order to access the afterlife. Anatomical dissection did not resume for almost 1500 years, and in the interim anatomical knowledge was dominated by (often flawed) reports generated through the comparative dissection of animals. When a growing recognition of the utility of anatomical knowledge in clinical medicine ushered human dissection back into vogue, it recommenced in a limited setting almost exclusively allowing for dissection of the bodies of convicted criminals. Ultimately, the ethical problems that this fostered, as well as the increasing demand from medical education for greater volumes of human dissection, shaped new considerations of the body after death. Presently, body bequeathal programs are a popular way in which individuals offer their bodies to medical education after death, suggesting that the once widespread views of dissection as punishment have largely dissipated.https://www.rmmj.org.il/issues/48/1152/manuscriptanatomydissectionepistemic frameworkshistorymedical education
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Connor T. A. Brenna
spellingShingle Connor T. A. Brenna
Post-Mortem Pedagogy: A Brief History of the Practice of Anatomical Dissection
Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal
anatomy
dissection
epistemic frameworks
history
medical education
author_facet Connor T. A. Brenna
author_sort Connor T. A. Brenna
title Post-Mortem Pedagogy: A Brief History of the Practice of Anatomical Dissection
title_short Post-Mortem Pedagogy: A Brief History of the Practice of Anatomical Dissection
title_full Post-Mortem Pedagogy: A Brief History of the Practice of Anatomical Dissection
title_fullStr Post-Mortem Pedagogy: A Brief History of the Practice of Anatomical Dissection
title_full_unstemmed Post-Mortem Pedagogy: A Brief History of the Practice of Anatomical Dissection
title_sort post-mortem pedagogy: a brief history of the practice of anatomical dissection
publisher Rambam Health Care Campus
series Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal
issn 2076-9172
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Anatomical dissection is almost ubiquitous in modern medical education, masking a complex history of its practice. Dissection with the express purpose of understanding human anatomy began more than two millennia ago with Herophilus, but was soon after disavowed in the third century BCE. Historical evidence suggests that this position was based on common beliefs that the body must remain whole after death in order to access the afterlife. Anatomical dissection did not resume for almost 1500 years, and in the interim anatomical knowledge was dominated by (often flawed) reports generated through the comparative dissection of animals. When a growing recognition of the utility of anatomical knowledge in clinical medicine ushered human dissection back into vogue, it recommenced in a limited setting almost exclusively allowing for dissection of the bodies of convicted criminals. Ultimately, the ethical problems that this fostered, as well as the increasing demand from medical education for greater volumes of human dissection, shaped new considerations of the body after death. Presently, body bequeathal programs are a popular way in which individuals offer their bodies to medical education after death, suggesting that the once widespread views of dissection as punishment have largely dissipated.
topic anatomy
dissection
epistemic frameworks
history
medical education
url https://www.rmmj.org.il/issues/48/1152/manuscript
work_keys_str_mv AT connortabrenna postmortempedagogyabriefhistoryofthepracticeofanatomicaldissection
_version_ 1724321492042252288