Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs?
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Defecography has been recognized as a valuable method for evaluating patients with evacuation disorders. It consists of the use of static radiography and fluoroscopy to record different situations within anorectal dynamics. Conventionally, rectal parameters are measured using...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Associação Paulista de Medicina
|
Series: | São Paulo Medical Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802005000300003&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-4402b2b339704bd1b54f491608f34a48 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4402b2b339704bd1b54f491608f34a482020-11-24T23:29:31ZengAssociação Paulista de MedicinaSão Paulo Medical Journal1806-9460123310510710.1590/S1516-31802005000300003S1516-31802005000300003Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs?Carlos Walter Sobrado0Carlos Eduardo Fonseca Pires1Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araújo2Edson Amaro3Angelita Habr-Gama4Desidério Roberto Kiss5Universidade de São PauloUniversidade de São PauloUniversidade de São PauloUniversidade de São PauloUniversidade de São PauloUniversidade de São PauloCONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Defecography has been recognized as a valuable method for evaluating patients with evacuation disorders. It consists of the use of static radiography and fluoroscopy to record different situations within anorectal dynamics. Conventionally, rectal parameters are measured using radiograms. It is rare for fluoroscopy alone to be used. Computer software has been developed with the specific aim of calculating these measurements from digitized videotaped images obtained during fluoroscopy, without the need for radiographic film, thereby developing a computerized videodefecography method. The objective was thus to compare measurements obtained via computerized videodefecography with conventional measurements and to discuss the advantages of the new method. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study at the radiology service of Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo. METHOD: Ten consecutive normal subjects underwent videodefecography. The anorectal angle, anorectal junction, puborectalis muscle length, anal canal length and degree of anal relaxation were obtained via the conventional method (using radiography film) and via computerized videodefecography using the ANGDIST software. Measurement and analysis of these parameters was performed by two independent physicians. RESULTS: Statistical analysis confirmed that the measurements obtained through direct radiography film assessment and using digital image analysis (computerized videodefecography) were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized videodefecography is equivalent to the traditional defecography examination. It has the advantage of offering reduced radiation exposure through saving on the use of radiography.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802005000300003&lng=en&tlng=enDefecographyPhysiologyAnusRadiationColorectal surgery |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Carlos Walter Sobrado Carlos Eduardo Fonseca Pires Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araújo Edson Amaro Angelita Habr-Gama Desidério Roberto Kiss |
spellingShingle |
Carlos Walter Sobrado Carlos Eduardo Fonseca Pires Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araújo Edson Amaro Angelita Habr-Gama Desidério Roberto Kiss Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs? São Paulo Medical Journal Defecography Physiology Anus Radiation Colorectal surgery |
author_facet |
Carlos Walter Sobrado Carlos Eduardo Fonseca Pires Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araújo Edson Amaro Angelita Habr-Gama Desidério Roberto Kiss |
author_sort |
Carlos Walter Sobrado |
title |
Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs? |
title_short |
Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs? |
title_full |
Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs? |
title_fullStr |
Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs? |
title_sort |
computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs? |
publisher |
Associação Paulista de Medicina |
series |
São Paulo Medical Journal |
issn |
1806-9460 |
description |
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Defecography has been recognized as a valuable method for evaluating patients with evacuation disorders. It consists of the use of static radiography and fluoroscopy to record different situations within anorectal dynamics. Conventionally, rectal parameters are measured using radiograms. It is rare for fluoroscopy alone to be used. Computer software has been developed with the specific aim of calculating these measurements from digitized videotaped images obtained during fluoroscopy, without the need for radiographic film, thereby developing a computerized videodefecography method. The objective was thus to compare measurements obtained via computerized videodefecography with conventional measurements and to discuss the advantages of the new method. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study at the radiology service of Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo. METHOD: Ten consecutive normal subjects underwent videodefecography. The anorectal angle, anorectal junction, puborectalis muscle length, anal canal length and degree of anal relaxation were obtained via the conventional method (using radiography film) and via computerized videodefecography using the ANGDIST software. Measurement and analysis of these parameters was performed by two independent physicians. RESULTS: Statistical analysis confirmed that the measurements obtained through direct radiography film assessment and using digital image analysis (computerized videodefecography) were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized videodefecography is equivalent to the traditional defecography examination. It has the advantage of offering reduced radiation exposure through saving on the use of radiography. |
topic |
Defecography Physiology Anus Radiation Colorectal surgery |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802005000300003&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT carloswaltersobrado computerizedvideodefecographyversusdefecographydoweneedradiographs AT carloseduardofonsecapires computerizedvideodefecographyversusdefecographydoweneedradiographs AT sergioeduardoalonsoaraujo computerizedvideodefecographyversusdefecographydoweneedradiographs AT edsonamaro computerizedvideodefecographyversusdefecographydoweneedradiographs AT angelitahabrgama computerizedvideodefecographyversusdefecographydoweneedradiographs AT desideriorobertokiss computerizedvideodefecographyversusdefecographydoweneedradiographs |
_version_ |
1725545127504510976 |