Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs?

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Defecography has been recognized as a valuable method for evaluating patients with evacuation disorders. It consists of the use of static radiography and fluoroscopy to record different situations within anorectal dynamics. Conventionally, rectal parameters are measured using...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carlos Walter Sobrado, Carlos Eduardo Fonseca Pires, Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araújo, Edson Amaro, Angelita Habr-Gama, Desidério Roberto Kiss
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Paulista de Medicina
Series:São Paulo Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802005000300003&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-4402b2b339704bd1b54f491608f34a48
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4402b2b339704bd1b54f491608f34a482020-11-24T23:29:31ZengAssociação Paulista de MedicinaSão Paulo Medical Journal1806-9460123310510710.1590/S1516-31802005000300003S1516-31802005000300003Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs?Carlos Walter Sobrado0Carlos Eduardo Fonseca Pires1Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araújo2Edson Amaro3Angelita Habr-Gama4Desidério Roberto Kiss5Universidade de São PauloUniversidade de São PauloUniversidade de São PauloUniversidade de São PauloUniversidade de São PauloUniversidade de São PauloCONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Defecography has been recognized as a valuable method for evaluating patients with evacuation disorders. It consists of the use of static radiography and fluoroscopy to record different situations within anorectal dynamics. Conventionally, rectal parameters are measured using radiograms. It is rare for fluoroscopy alone to be used. Computer software has been developed with the specific aim of calculating these measurements from digitized videotaped images obtained during fluoroscopy, without the need for radiographic film, thereby developing a computerized videodefecography method. The objective was thus to compare measurements obtained via computerized videodefecography with conventional measurements and to discuss the advantages of the new method. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study at the radiology service of Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo. METHOD: Ten consecutive normal subjects underwent videodefecography. The anorectal angle, anorectal junction, puborectalis muscle length, anal canal length and degree of anal relaxation were obtained via the conventional method (using radiography film) and via computerized videodefecography using the ANGDIST software. Measurement and analysis of these parameters was performed by two independent physicians. RESULTS: Statistical analysis confirmed that the measurements obtained through direct radiography film assessment and using digital image analysis (computerized videodefecography) were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized videodefecography is equivalent to the traditional defecography examination. It has the advantage of offering reduced radiation exposure through saving on the use of radiography.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802005000300003&lng=en&tlng=enDefecographyPhysiologyAnusRadiationColorectal surgery
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carlos Walter Sobrado
Carlos Eduardo Fonseca Pires
Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araújo
Edson Amaro
Angelita Habr-Gama
Desidério Roberto Kiss
spellingShingle Carlos Walter Sobrado
Carlos Eduardo Fonseca Pires
Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araújo
Edson Amaro
Angelita Habr-Gama
Desidério Roberto Kiss
Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs?
São Paulo Medical Journal
Defecography
Physiology
Anus
Radiation
Colorectal surgery
author_facet Carlos Walter Sobrado
Carlos Eduardo Fonseca Pires
Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araújo
Edson Amaro
Angelita Habr-Gama
Desidério Roberto Kiss
author_sort Carlos Walter Sobrado
title Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs?
title_short Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs?
title_full Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs?
title_fullStr Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs?
title_full_unstemmed Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs?
title_sort computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs?
publisher Associação Paulista de Medicina
series São Paulo Medical Journal
issn 1806-9460
description CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Defecography has been recognized as a valuable method for evaluating patients with evacuation disorders. It consists of the use of static radiography and fluoroscopy to record different situations within anorectal dynamics. Conventionally, rectal parameters are measured using radiograms. It is rare for fluoroscopy alone to be used. Computer software has been developed with the specific aim of calculating these measurements from digitized videotaped images obtained during fluoroscopy, without the need for radiographic film, thereby developing a computerized videodefecography method. The objective was thus to compare measurements obtained via computerized videodefecography with conventional measurements and to discuss the advantages of the new method. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study at the radiology service of Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo. METHOD: Ten consecutive normal subjects underwent videodefecography. The anorectal angle, anorectal junction, puborectalis muscle length, anal canal length and degree of anal relaxation were obtained via the conventional method (using radiography film) and via computerized videodefecography using the ANGDIST software. Measurement and analysis of these parameters was performed by two independent physicians. RESULTS: Statistical analysis confirmed that the measurements obtained through direct radiography film assessment and using digital image analysis (computerized videodefecography) were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized videodefecography is equivalent to the traditional defecography examination. It has the advantage of offering reduced radiation exposure through saving on the use of radiography.
topic Defecography
Physiology
Anus
Radiation
Colorectal surgery
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802005000300003&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT carloswaltersobrado computerizedvideodefecographyversusdefecographydoweneedradiographs
AT carloseduardofonsecapires computerizedvideodefecographyversusdefecographydoweneedradiographs
AT sergioeduardoalonsoaraujo computerizedvideodefecographyversusdefecographydoweneedradiographs
AT edsonamaro computerizedvideodefecographyversusdefecographydoweneedradiographs
AT angelitahabrgama computerizedvideodefecographyversusdefecographydoweneedradiographs
AT desideriorobertokiss computerizedvideodefecographyversusdefecographydoweneedradiographs
_version_ 1725545127504510976