Is compatible the idea of incommensurability with that of scientific progress? Some reasons in support of its compatibility [Spanish]

The problem of incommensurability and, particulary, the one of the scientific progress, is associated two names: Kuhn and Feyerabend, whose proposals caused than many put in doubt the apparent evidence of the call scientific progress, relativizing its validity to each school or paradigm. In this wri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Juan Manuel Jaramillo Uribe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Fundación Universidad del Norte 2006-01-01
Series:Eidos
Subjects:
Online Access:http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/eidos/article/view/1495/964
id doaj-43f6eafb7ae84c66a65e17e32a6d3f2c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-43f6eafb7ae84c66a65e17e32a6d3f2c2021-05-03T01:44:44ZengFundación Universidad del NorteEidos1692-88572011-74772006-01-0151049Is compatible the idea of incommensurability with that of scientific progress? Some reasons in support of its compatibility [Spanish]Juan Manuel Jaramillo UribeThe problem of incommensurability and, particulary, the one of the scientific progress, is associated two names: Kuhn and Feyerabend, whose proposals caused than many put in doubt the apparent evidence of the call scientific progress, relativizing its validity to each school or paradigm. In this writing we will show that this type of epistemic relativism —just as convergentist theory of the truth— they lack of philosophical validity and historical and how the idea of scientific progress is compatible with the thesis of the incommensurability beyond the ontosemantics difficulties that it implies. This suppose to leave the the call statement view of the scientific theories and adopt a non-statement view where the intertheoretical relation of approach allows to subsink different non trivial incommensurability and to validate in them the notion oaf scientific progress. http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/eidos/article/view/1495/964Incommensurabilityscientificprogressrelation of approachstatementviewnon-statement view
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Juan Manuel Jaramillo Uribe
spellingShingle Juan Manuel Jaramillo Uribe
Is compatible the idea of incommensurability with that of scientific progress? Some reasons in support of its compatibility [Spanish]
Eidos
Incommensurability
scientific
progress
relation of approach
statement
view
non-statement view
author_facet Juan Manuel Jaramillo Uribe
author_sort Juan Manuel Jaramillo Uribe
title Is compatible the idea of incommensurability with that of scientific progress? Some reasons in support of its compatibility [Spanish]
title_short Is compatible the idea of incommensurability with that of scientific progress? Some reasons in support of its compatibility [Spanish]
title_full Is compatible the idea of incommensurability with that of scientific progress? Some reasons in support of its compatibility [Spanish]
title_fullStr Is compatible the idea of incommensurability with that of scientific progress? Some reasons in support of its compatibility [Spanish]
title_full_unstemmed Is compatible the idea of incommensurability with that of scientific progress? Some reasons in support of its compatibility [Spanish]
title_sort is compatible the idea of incommensurability with that of scientific progress? some reasons in support of its compatibility [spanish]
publisher Fundación Universidad del Norte
series Eidos
issn 1692-8857
2011-7477
publishDate 2006-01-01
description The problem of incommensurability and, particulary, the one of the scientific progress, is associated two names: Kuhn and Feyerabend, whose proposals caused than many put in doubt the apparent evidence of the call scientific progress, relativizing its validity to each school or paradigm. In this writing we will show that this type of epistemic relativism —just as convergentist theory of the truth— they lack of philosophical validity and historical and how the idea of scientific progress is compatible with the thesis of the incommensurability beyond the ontosemantics difficulties that it implies. This suppose to leave the the call statement view of the scientific theories and adopt a non-statement view where the intertheoretical relation of approach allows to subsink different non trivial incommensurability and to validate in them the notion oaf scientific progress.
topic Incommensurability
scientific
progress
relation of approach
statement
view
non-statement view
url http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/eidos/article/view/1495/964
work_keys_str_mv AT juanmanueljaramillouribe iscompatibletheideaofincommensurabilitywiththatofscientificprogresssomereasonsinsupportofitscompatibilityspanish
_version_ 1721485452169445376