Hemodynamic Profiles of Cardiogenic Shock Depending on Their Etiology

• Main Authors: Mélanie Gaubert, Marc Laine, Noémie Resseguier, Nadia Aissaoui, Etienne Puymirat, Gilles Lemesle, Pierre Michelet, Sami Hraiech, Bruno Lévy, Clément Delmas, Laurent Bonello
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2020-10-01
• Series: Journal of Clinical Medicine
• Subjects: cardiogenic shock; hemodynamic evaluation; acute myocardial infarction; acute decompensated heart failure
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/11/3384

The pathophysiology of cardiogenic shock (CS) varies depending on its etiology, which may lead to different hemodynamic profiles (HP) and may help tailor therapy. We aimed to assess the HP of CS patients according to their etiologies of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and acute decompensated chronic heart failure (ADCHF). We included patients admitted for CS secondary to ADCHF and AMI. HP were measured before the administration of any inotrope or vasopressor. Systemic Vascular Resistances index (SVRi), Cardiac Index (CI), and Cardiac Power Index (CPI) were measured by trans-thoracic Doppler echocardiography on admission. Among 37 CS patients, 28 had CS secondary to ADCHF or AMI and were prospectively included. The two groups were similar in terms of demographic data and shock severity criteria. AMI CS was associated with lower SVRi compared to CS related to ADCHF: 2010 (interquartile range (IQR): 1895–2277) vs. 2622 (2264–2993) dynes-s·cm⁻⁵·m⁻² (<i>p</i> = 0.002). A trend toward a higher CI was observed: respectively 2.13 (1.88–2.18) vs. 1.78 (1.65–1.96) L·min⁻¹·m⁻² (<i>p</i> = 0.067) in AMICS compared to ADCHF. CS patients had different HP according to their etiologies. AMICS had lower SVR and tended to have a higher CI compared to ADHF CS. These differences should be taken into account for patient selection in future research.