Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation are noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques that can alter excitability of the human cortex. Considering the interhemispheric competition occurring after stroke, improvement in motor deficits can be achi...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2012-01-01
|
Series: | Stroke Research and Treatment |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/584727 |
id |
doaj-43c1ded064f74bcdba8811003d3f6e15 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-43c1ded064f74bcdba8811003d3f6e152021-07-02T02:37:34ZengHindawi LimitedStroke Research and Treatment2090-81052042-00562012-01-01201210.1155/2012/584727584727Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future ViewsNaoyuki Takeuchi0Shin-Ichi Izumi1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-cho, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8575, JapanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-cho, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8575, JapanRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation are noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques that can alter excitability of the human cortex. Considering the interhemispheric competition occurring after stroke, improvement in motor deficits can be achieved by increasing the excitability of the affected hemisphere or decreasing the excitability of the unaffected hemisphere. Many reports have shown that NIBS application improves motor function in stroke patients by using their physiological peculiarity. For continuous motor improvement, it is important to impart additional motor training while NIBS modulates the neural network between both hemispheres and remodels the disturbed network in the affected hemisphere. NIBS can be an adjuvant therapy for developed neurorehabilitation strategies for stroke patients. Moreover, recent studies have reported that bilateral NIBS can more effectively facilitate neural plasticity and induce motor recovery after stroke. However, the best NIBS pattern has not been established, and clinicians should select the type of NIBS by considering the NIBS mechanism. Here, we review the underlying mechanisms and future views of NIBS therapy and propose rehabilitation approaches for appropriate cortical reorganization.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/584727 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Naoyuki Takeuchi Shin-Ichi Izumi |
spellingShingle |
Naoyuki Takeuchi Shin-Ichi Izumi Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views Stroke Research and Treatment |
author_facet |
Naoyuki Takeuchi Shin-Ichi Izumi |
author_sort |
Naoyuki Takeuchi |
title |
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views |
title_short |
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views |
title_full |
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views |
title_fullStr |
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views |
title_full_unstemmed |
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views |
title_sort |
noninvasive brain stimulation for motor recovery after stroke: mechanisms and future views |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Stroke Research and Treatment |
issn |
2090-8105 2042-0056 |
publishDate |
2012-01-01 |
description |
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation are noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques that can alter excitability of the human cortex. Considering the interhemispheric competition occurring after stroke, improvement in motor deficits can be achieved by increasing the excitability of the affected hemisphere or decreasing the excitability of the unaffected hemisphere. Many reports have shown that NIBS application improves motor function in stroke patients by using their physiological peculiarity. For continuous motor improvement, it is important to impart additional motor training while NIBS modulates the neural network between both hemispheres and remodels the disturbed network in the affected hemisphere. NIBS can be an adjuvant therapy for developed neurorehabilitation strategies for stroke patients. Moreover, recent studies have reported that bilateral NIBS can more effectively facilitate neural plasticity and induce motor recovery after stroke. However, the best NIBS pattern has not been established, and clinicians should select the type of NIBS by considering the NIBS mechanism. Here, we review the underlying mechanisms and future views of NIBS therapy and propose rehabilitation approaches for appropriate cortical reorganization. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/584727 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT naoyukitakeuchi noninvasivebrainstimulationformotorrecoveryafterstrokemechanismsandfutureviews AT shinichiizumi noninvasivebrainstimulationformotorrecoveryafterstrokemechanismsandfutureviews |
_version_ |
1721343006880038912 |