Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation are noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques that can alter excitability of the human cortex. Considering the interhemispheric competition occurring after stroke, improvement in motor deficits can be achi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Naoyuki Takeuchi, Shin-Ichi Izumi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:Stroke Research and Treatment
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/584727
id doaj-43c1ded064f74bcdba8811003d3f6e15
record_format Article
spelling doaj-43c1ded064f74bcdba8811003d3f6e152021-07-02T02:37:34ZengHindawi LimitedStroke Research and Treatment2090-81052042-00562012-01-01201210.1155/2012/584727584727Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future ViewsNaoyuki Takeuchi0Shin-Ichi Izumi1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-cho, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8575, JapanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-cho, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8575, JapanRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation are noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques that can alter excitability of the human cortex. Considering the interhemispheric competition occurring after stroke, improvement in motor deficits can be achieved by increasing the excitability of the affected hemisphere or decreasing the excitability of the unaffected hemisphere. Many reports have shown that NIBS application improves motor function in stroke patients by using their physiological peculiarity. For continuous motor improvement, it is important to impart additional motor training while NIBS modulates the neural network between both hemispheres and remodels the disturbed network in the affected hemisphere. NIBS can be an adjuvant therapy for developed neurorehabilitation strategies for stroke patients. Moreover, recent studies have reported that bilateral NIBS can more effectively facilitate neural plasticity and induce motor recovery after stroke. However, the best NIBS pattern has not been established, and clinicians should select the type of NIBS by considering the NIBS mechanism. Here, we review the underlying mechanisms and future views of NIBS therapy and propose rehabilitation approaches for appropriate cortical reorganization.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/584727
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Naoyuki Takeuchi
Shin-Ichi Izumi
spellingShingle Naoyuki Takeuchi
Shin-Ichi Izumi
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views
Stroke Research and Treatment
author_facet Naoyuki Takeuchi
Shin-Ichi Izumi
author_sort Naoyuki Takeuchi
title Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views
title_short Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views
title_full Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views
title_fullStr Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views
title_full_unstemmed Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views
title_sort noninvasive brain stimulation for motor recovery after stroke: mechanisms and future views
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Stroke Research and Treatment
issn 2090-8105
2042-0056
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation are noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques that can alter excitability of the human cortex. Considering the interhemispheric competition occurring after stroke, improvement in motor deficits can be achieved by increasing the excitability of the affected hemisphere or decreasing the excitability of the unaffected hemisphere. Many reports have shown that NIBS application improves motor function in stroke patients by using their physiological peculiarity. For continuous motor improvement, it is important to impart additional motor training while NIBS modulates the neural network between both hemispheres and remodels the disturbed network in the affected hemisphere. NIBS can be an adjuvant therapy for developed neurorehabilitation strategies for stroke patients. Moreover, recent studies have reported that bilateral NIBS can more effectively facilitate neural plasticity and induce motor recovery after stroke. However, the best NIBS pattern has not been established, and clinicians should select the type of NIBS by considering the NIBS mechanism. Here, we review the underlying mechanisms and future views of NIBS therapy and propose rehabilitation approaches for appropriate cortical reorganization.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/584727
work_keys_str_mv AT naoyukitakeuchi noninvasivebrainstimulationformotorrecoveryafterstrokemechanismsandfutureviews
AT shinichiizumi noninvasivebrainstimulationformotorrecoveryafterstrokemechanismsandfutureviews
_version_ 1721343006880038912