DNA Damage Reduces the Quality, but Not the Quantity of Human Papillomavirus 16 E1 and E2 DNA Replication

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are causative agents in almost all cervical carcinomas. HPVs are also causative agents in head and neck cancer, the cases of which are increasing rapidly. Viral replication activates the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway; associated proteins are recruited to replication...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Molly L. Bristol, Xu Wang, Nathan W. Smith, Minkyeong P. Son, Michael R. Evans, Iain M. Morgan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-06-01
Series:Viruses
Subjects:
E1
E2
HPV
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/8/6/175
id doaj-43c107371bd9409fb6941d5dd973bde2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-43c107371bd9409fb6941d5dd973bde22020-11-24T23:00:30ZengMDPI AGViruses1999-49152016-06-018617510.3390/v8060175v8060175DNA Damage Reduces the Quality, but Not the Quantity of Human Papillomavirus 16 E1 and E2 DNA ReplicationMolly L. Bristol0Xu Wang1Nathan W. Smith2Minkyeong P. Son3Michael R. Evans4Iain M. Morgan5VCU Philips Institute for Oral Health Research, Department of Oral and Craniofacial Molecular Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Dentistry, Richmond, VA 23298, USAVCU Philips Institute for Oral Health Research, Department of Oral and Craniofacial Molecular Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Dentistry, Richmond, VA 23298, USAVCU Philips Institute for Oral Health Research, Department of Oral and Craniofacial Molecular Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Dentistry, Richmond, VA 23298, USAVCU Philips Institute for Oral Health Research, Department of Oral and Craniofacial Molecular Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Dentistry, Richmond, VA 23298, USAVCU Philips Institute for Oral Health Research, Department of Oral and Craniofacial Molecular Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Dentistry, Richmond, VA 23298, USAVCU Philips Institute for Oral Health Research, Department of Oral and Craniofacial Molecular Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Dentistry, Richmond, VA 23298, USAHuman papillomaviruses (HPVs) are causative agents in almost all cervical carcinomas. HPVs are also causative agents in head and neck cancer, the cases of which are increasing rapidly. Viral replication activates the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway; associated proteins are recruited to replication foci, and this pathway may serve to allow for viral genome amplification. Likewise, HPV genome double-strand breaks (DSBs) could be produced during replication and could lead to linearization and viral integration. Many studies have shown that viral integration into the host genome results in unregulated expression of the viral oncogenes, E6 and E7, promoting HPV-induced carcinogenesis. Previously, we have demonstrated that DNA-damaging agents, such as etoposide, or knocking down viral replication partner proteins, such as topoisomerase II β binding protein I (TopBP1), does not reduce the level of DNA replication. Here, we investigated whether these treatments alter the quality of DNA replication by HPV16 E1 and E2. We confirm that knockdown of TopBP1 or treatment with etoposide does not reduce total levels of E1/E2-mediated DNA replication; however, the quality of replication is significantly reduced. The results demonstrate that E1 and E2 continue to replicate under genomically-stressed conditions and that this replication is mutagenic. This mutagenesis would promote the formation of substrates for integration of the viral genome into that of the host, a hallmark of cervical cancer.http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/8/6/175papillomavirusescancerreplicationetoposideintegrationE1E2TopBP1HPV
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Molly L. Bristol
Xu Wang
Nathan W. Smith
Minkyeong P. Son
Michael R. Evans
Iain M. Morgan
spellingShingle Molly L. Bristol
Xu Wang
Nathan W. Smith
Minkyeong P. Son
Michael R. Evans
Iain M. Morgan
DNA Damage Reduces the Quality, but Not the Quantity of Human Papillomavirus 16 E1 and E2 DNA Replication
Viruses
papillomaviruses
cancer
replication
etoposide
integration
E1
E2
TopBP1
HPV
author_facet Molly L. Bristol
Xu Wang
Nathan W. Smith
Minkyeong P. Son
Michael R. Evans
Iain M. Morgan
author_sort Molly L. Bristol
title DNA Damage Reduces the Quality, but Not the Quantity of Human Papillomavirus 16 E1 and E2 DNA Replication
title_short DNA Damage Reduces the Quality, but Not the Quantity of Human Papillomavirus 16 E1 and E2 DNA Replication
title_full DNA Damage Reduces the Quality, but Not the Quantity of Human Papillomavirus 16 E1 and E2 DNA Replication
title_fullStr DNA Damage Reduces the Quality, but Not the Quantity of Human Papillomavirus 16 E1 and E2 DNA Replication
title_full_unstemmed DNA Damage Reduces the Quality, but Not the Quantity of Human Papillomavirus 16 E1 and E2 DNA Replication
title_sort dna damage reduces the quality, but not the quantity of human papillomavirus 16 e1 and e2 dna replication
publisher MDPI AG
series Viruses
issn 1999-4915
publishDate 2016-06-01
description Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are causative agents in almost all cervical carcinomas. HPVs are also causative agents in head and neck cancer, the cases of which are increasing rapidly. Viral replication activates the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway; associated proteins are recruited to replication foci, and this pathway may serve to allow for viral genome amplification. Likewise, HPV genome double-strand breaks (DSBs) could be produced during replication and could lead to linearization and viral integration. Many studies have shown that viral integration into the host genome results in unregulated expression of the viral oncogenes, E6 and E7, promoting HPV-induced carcinogenesis. Previously, we have demonstrated that DNA-damaging agents, such as etoposide, or knocking down viral replication partner proteins, such as topoisomerase II β binding protein I (TopBP1), does not reduce the level of DNA replication. Here, we investigated whether these treatments alter the quality of DNA replication by HPV16 E1 and E2. We confirm that knockdown of TopBP1 or treatment with etoposide does not reduce total levels of E1/E2-mediated DNA replication; however, the quality of replication is significantly reduced. The results demonstrate that E1 and E2 continue to replicate under genomically-stressed conditions and that this replication is mutagenic. This mutagenesis would promote the formation of substrates for integration of the viral genome into that of the host, a hallmark of cervical cancer.
topic papillomaviruses
cancer
replication
etoposide
integration
E1
E2
TopBP1
HPV
url http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/8/6/175
work_keys_str_mv AT mollylbristol dnadamagereducesthequalitybutnotthequantityofhumanpapillomavirus16e1ande2dnareplication
AT xuwang dnadamagereducesthequalitybutnotthequantityofhumanpapillomavirus16e1ande2dnareplication
AT nathanwsmith dnadamagereducesthequalitybutnotthequantityofhumanpapillomavirus16e1ande2dnareplication
AT minkyeongpson dnadamagereducesthequalitybutnotthequantityofhumanpapillomavirus16e1ande2dnareplication
AT michaelrevans dnadamagereducesthequalitybutnotthequantityofhumanpapillomavirus16e1ande2dnareplication
AT iainmmorgan dnadamagereducesthequalitybutnotthequantityofhumanpapillomavirus16e1ande2dnareplication
_version_ 1725642178761326592