Increasing tobacco taxes by less than 5% is ineffective: Lessons from 2000-2018 surveys in France

Introduction France has an erratic anti-smoking policy. Effectives measures follow phases of stagnation or even regression. Until recently, taxation policies were decided only in the short term. These variations give the opportunity to analyze the effect of the price increase on cigarette sales. Me...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bertrand Dautzenberg, Marie-Dominique Dautzenberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Publishing 2019-03-01
Series:Tobacco Prevention and Cessation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.journalssystem.com/tpc/,105195,0,2.html
id doaj-43b84fb1fd534e3b9aab26b27f9297dd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-43b84fb1fd534e3b9aab26b27f9297dd2020-11-24T22:07:36ZengEuropean PublishingTobacco Prevention and Cessation2459-30872019-03-015Supplement10.18332/tpc/105195105195Increasing tobacco taxes by less than 5% is ineffective: Lessons from 2000-2018 surveys in FranceBertrand Dautzenberg0Marie-Dominique Dautzenberg1French alliance against tobacco, FranceParis sans tabac, FranceIntroduction France has an erratic anti-smoking policy. Effectives measures follow phases of stagnation or even regression. Until recently, taxation policies were decided only in the short term. These variations give the opportunity to analyze the effect of the price increase on cigarette sales. Methods From 2000 to 2018 we study change in yearly sales of cigarettes in metropolitan France to (source OFDT) to the price of the top sale cigarette pack (year n/ year n-1). In the case of an increase during the year, a monthly weighting is carried out. The results are expressed as the elasticity. If a price increases by 10% and sales fall by 6% the elasticity will be 0.6, it will also be 0.6 if a 5% increase price leads a 3% drop in sales). Results From 2000-2018, the 3 price increases >10% caused a sharp tobacco sales decline (0.9 elasticity). The 2 increases of 6-9% were almost as effective (elasticity 0.84). The 2 increases of 5% price resulted in a lower response (0.47 elasticity). The 5 small price increases <4.5% provide minimal response (0.16 elasticity). Increase of cigarette sales has been observed during the 4 years without price increase. Conclusions An above 6% step price (taxes) increase is needing to have significant public health effect. A 10% step increase is optimal Therefore any increase of 6% or better 10% to lower tobacco consumption without reducing the resources of the states.http://www.journalssystem.com/tpc/,105195,0,2.htmltobacco taxes
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bertrand Dautzenberg
Marie-Dominique Dautzenberg
spellingShingle Bertrand Dautzenberg
Marie-Dominique Dautzenberg
Increasing tobacco taxes by less than 5% is ineffective: Lessons from 2000-2018 surveys in France
Tobacco Prevention and Cessation
tobacco taxes
author_facet Bertrand Dautzenberg
Marie-Dominique Dautzenberg
author_sort Bertrand Dautzenberg
title Increasing tobacco taxes by less than 5% is ineffective: Lessons from 2000-2018 surveys in France
title_short Increasing tobacco taxes by less than 5% is ineffective: Lessons from 2000-2018 surveys in France
title_full Increasing tobacco taxes by less than 5% is ineffective: Lessons from 2000-2018 surveys in France
title_fullStr Increasing tobacco taxes by less than 5% is ineffective: Lessons from 2000-2018 surveys in France
title_full_unstemmed Increasing tobacco taxes by less than 5% is ineffective: Lessons from 2000-2018 surveys in France
title_sort increasing tobacco taxes by less than 5% is ineffective: lessons from 2000-2018 surveys in france
publisher European Publishing
series Tobacco Prevention and Cessation
issn 2459-3087
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Introduction France has an erratic anti-smoking policy. Effectives measures follow phases of stagnation or even regression. Until recently, taxation policies were decided only in the short term. These variations give the opportunity to analyze the effect of the price increase on cigarette sales. Methods From 2000 to 2018 we study change in yearly sales of cigarettes in metropolitan France to (source OFDT) to the price of the top sale cigarette pack (year n/ year n-1). In the case of an increase during the year, a monthly weighting is carried out. The results are expressed as the elasticity. If a price increases by 10% and sales fall by 6% the elasticity will be 0.6, it will also be 0.6 if a 5% increase price leads a 3% drop in sales). Results From 2000-2018, the 3 price increases >10% caused a sharp tobacco sales decline (0.9 elasticity). The 2 increases of 6-9% were almost as effective (elasticity 0.84). The 2 increases of 5% price resulted in a lower response (0.47 elasticity). The 5 small price increases <4.5% provide minimal response (0.16 elasticity). Increase of cigarette sales has been observed during the 4 years without price increase. Conclusions An above 6% step price (taxes) increase is needing to have significant public health effect. A 10% step increase is optimal Therefore any increase of 6% or better 10% to lower tobacco consumption without reducing the resources of the states.
topic tobacco taxes
url http://www.journalssystem.com/tpc/,105195,0,2.html
work_keys_str_mv AT bertranddautzenberg increasingtobaccotaxesbylessthan5isineffectivelessonsfrom20002018surveysinfrance
AT mariedominiquedautzenberg increasingtobaccotaxesbylessthan5isineffectivelessonsfrom20002018surveysinfrance
_version_ 1725819498613702656