Impact of peer review on discussion of study limitations and strength of claims in randomized trial reports: a before and after study
Abstract Background In their research reports, scientists are expected to discuss limitations that their studies have. Previous research showed that often, such discussion is absent. Also, many journals emphasize the importance of avoiding overstatement of claims. We wanted to see to what extent edi...
Main Authors: | Kerem Keserlioglu, Halil Kilicoglu, Gerben ter Riet |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-09-01
|
Series: | Research Integrity and Peer Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41073-019-0078-2 |
Similar Items
-
Before-and-after online community survey on knowledge and perception of COVID-19 pandemic
by: Wojciech Nazar, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01) -
Before–after field study of effects of wind turbine noise on polysomnographic sleep parameters
by: Leila Jalali, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Incentives as connectors: insights into a breastfeeding incentive intervention in a disadvantaged area of North-West England
by: Thomson Gill, et al.
Published: (2012-03-01) -
Evaluating the Safety Impacts of Increased Speed Limits on Freeways in Kansas Using Before-And-After Study Approach
by: Reza S. Shirazinejad, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01) -
The association between first-time accreditation and the delivery of recommended care: a before and after study in the Faroe Islands
by: Maria Daniella Bergholt, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)