Despite Resemblance - Scale Models and the Representation of Architectural Objects

The challenge of exploring ‘Inter and Transdisciplinary Relationships in Architecture’ might be embraced as a possibility to outward as much as to inward the comprehension of architecture and its design. This paper aims to reconsider the relationship between scale models and architectural objects af...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: João Miguel Couto Duarte
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Athens Institute for Education and Research 2019-01-01
Series:Athens Journal of Architecture
Online Access:https://www.athensjournals.gr/architecture/2019-5-1-4-Duarte.pdf
id doaj-4399dbd16c26460e831d380ae281808f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4399dbd16c26460e831d380ae281808f2020-11-25T03:57:09ZengAthens Institute for Education and ResearchAthens Journal of Architecture2407-94722407-94722019-01-01517798https://doi.org/10.30958/aja.5-1-4Despite Resemblance - Scale Models and the Representation of Architectural ObjectsJoão Miguel Couto Duarte0Assistant Professor/Research Fellow, Lusíada University/CITAD, PortugalThe challenge of exploring ‘Inter and Transdisciplinary Relationships in Architecture’ might be embraced as a possibility to outward as much as to inward the comprehension of architecture and its design. This paper aims to reconsider the relationship between scale models and architectural objects after Nelson Goodman’s discussion about resemblance and representation in ‘Languages of Art’, thus allowing a new understanding of the role of architectural representation in architectural design. In ‘Languages of Art’ the still common belief that representation profits from some sort of resemblance to its object is deemed untenable. It is strictly arbitrary the relation between one and the other. That is why – Goodman remarks – “almost anything may stand for almost anything else.” Drawings and photography might confirm Goodman’s statement since only a convention seems to allow the recognition of a three-dimensional object in a bi-dimensional one. But that is not the case with scale models. Due to its nature it remains comfortable to think about a scale model as having a natural resemblance to an architectural object, thus seeming its closest representation. Nevertheless Goodman’s proposals must be considered. Also scale models must be scrutinized as strictly arbitrary representations, resting upon a system of conventions instead of a set of proprieties shared with the architectural object it is meant to replace. And being confirmed its strictly arbitrariness, that is, being confirmed that is devoid of any natural relation with its subject, scale model’s role in architectural design must also be scrutinized. This paper will first discuss scale models’ representational nature and, subsequently, how the radical difference it holds from the object thus represented matters to architectural design. Scale models ought to be comprehended despite the resemblance deluded with the architecture they allow to envision.https://www.athensjournals.gr/architecture/2019-5-1-4-Duarte.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author João Miguel Couto Duarte
spellingShingle João Miguel Couto Duarte
Despite Resemblance - Scale Models and the Representation of Architectural Objects
Athens Journal of Architecture
author_facet João Miguel Couto Duarte
author_sort João Miguel Couto Duarte
title Despite Resemblance - Scale Models and the Representation of Architectural Objects
title_short Despite Resemblance - Scale Models and the Representation of Architectural Objects
title_full Despite Resemblance - Scale Models and the Representation of Architectural Objects
title_fullStr Despite Resemblance - Scale Models and the Representation of Architectural Objects
title_full_unstemmed Despite Resemblance - Scale Models and the Representation of Architectural Objects
title_sort despite resemblance - scale models and the representation of architectural objects
publisher Athens Institute for Education and Research
series Athens Journal of Architecture
issn 2407-9472
2407-9472
publishDate 2019-01-01
description The challenge of exploring ‘Inter and Transdisciplinary Relationships in Architecture’ might be embraced as a possibility to outward as much as to inward the comprehension of architecture and its design. This paper aims to reconsider the relationship between scale models and architectural objects after Nelson Goodman’s discussion about resemblance and representation in ‘Languages of Art’, thus allowing a new understanding of the role of architectural representation in architectural design. In ‘Languages of Art’ the still common belief that representation profits from some sort of resemblance to its object is deemed untenable. It is strictly arbitrary the relation between one and the other. That is why – Goodman remarks – “almost anything may stand for almost anything else.” Drawings and photography might confirm Goodman’s statement since only a convention seems to allow the recognition of a three-dimensional object in a bi-dimensional one. But that is not the case with scale models. Due to its nature it remains comfortable to think about a scale model as having a natural resemblance to an architectural object, thus seeming its closest representation. Nevertheless Goodman’s proposals must be considered. Also scale models must be scrutinized as strictly arbitrary representations, resting upon a system of conventions instead of a set of proprieties shared with the architectural object it is meant to replace. And being confirmed its strictly arbitrariness, that is, being confirmed that is devoid of any natural relation with its subject, scale model’s role in architectural design must also be scrutinized. This paper will first discuss scale models’ representational nature and, subsequently, how the radical difference it holds from the object thus represented matters to architectural design. Scale models ought to be comprehended despite the resemblance deluded with the architecture they allow to envision.
url https://www.athensjournals.gr/architecture/2019-5-1-4-Duarte.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT joaomiguelcoutoduarte despiteresemblancescalemodelsandtherepresentationofarchitecturalobjects
_version_ 1724461688378359808