A revision on EOQ/JIT indifference points

The overall objective of this paper is to present a comprehensive comparison between the EOQ model and JIT system to see either of them under which circumstances is more cost effective. There have been a few researchers dealing with the EOQ/JIT comparison model to guide companies whether or not swit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mehdi Rajabi Asadabadi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Growing Science 2015-09-01
Series:International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations
Subjects:
EOQ
EMQ
EPQ
JIT
Online Access:http://www.growingscience.com/ijiec/Vol6/IJIEC_2015_12.pdf
id doaj-438628798e064107a2efb6a005deb80b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-438628798e064107a2efb6a005deb80b2020-11-25T01:09:44ZengGrowing ScienceInternational Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations1923-29261923-29342015-09-016330531410.5267/j.ijiec.2015.4.001A revision on EOQ/JIT indifference pointsMehdi Rajabi AsadabadiThe overall objective of this paper is to present a comprehensive comparison between the EOQ model and JIT system to see either of them under which circumstances is more cost effective. There have been a few researchers dealing with the EOQ/JIT comparison model to guide companies whether or not switch to JIT or EOQ, however, their proposed models could be more realistic by taking some effective factors, such as hidden costs of a JIT system, interest rate, inflation rate, etc., into account. This research, by considering some less seen costs of both EOQ model and JIT system, develops the previous proposals of EOQ/JIT model. This paper analyzes the impact of increasing or decreasing some determinant factors such as the interest rate, from cost perspective, to help the decision on whether or not to switch the inventory system, however, to make such a decision, companies may also take some other factors into account. A sensible link is created between EOQ/JIT model and financial management to assure the decision makers that their financial concerns are observed in this model.http://www.growingscience.com/ijiec/Vol6/IJIEC_2015_12.pdfEOQEMQEPQJIT
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mehdi Rajabi Asadabadi
spellingShingle Mehdi Rajabi Asadabadi
A revision on EOQ/JIT indifference points
International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations
EOQ
EMQ
EPQ
JIT
author_facet Mehdi Rajabi Asadabadi
author_sort Mehdi Rajabi Asadabadi
title A revision on EOQ/JIT indifference points
title_short A revision on EOQ/JIT indifference points
title_full A revision on EOQ/JIT indifference points
title_fullStr A revision on EOQ/JIT indifference points
title_full_unstemmed A revision on EOQ/JIT indifference points
title_sort revision on eoq/jit indifference points
publisher Growing Science
series International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations
issn 1923-2926
1923-2934
publishDate 2015-09-01
description The overall objective of this paper is to present a comprehensive comparison between the EOQ model and JIT system to see either of them under which circumstances is more cost effective. There have been a few researchers dealing with the EOQ/JIT comparison model to guide companies whether or not switch to JIT or EOQ, however, their proposed models could be more realistic by taking some effective factors, such as hidden costs of a JIT system, interest rate, inflation rate, etc., into account. This research, by considering some less seen costs of both EOQ model and JIT system, develops the previous proposals of EOQ/JIT model. This paper analyzes the impact of increasing or decreasing some determinant factors such as the interest rate, from cost perspective, to help the decision on whether or not to switch the inventory system, however, to make such a decision, companies may also take some other factors into account. A sensible link is created between EOQ/JIT model and financial management to assure the decision makers that their financial concerns are observed in this model.
topic EOQ
EMQ
EPQ
JIT
url http://www.growingscience.com/ijiec/Vol6/IJIEC_2015_12.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mehdirajabiasadabadi arevisiononeoqjitindifferencepoints
AT mehdirajabiasadabadi revisiononeoqjitindifferencepoints
_version_ 1725176945697619968