Does managerial involvement in workplace coaching impact the outcome? A mixed-methods study into the current methods managers employ and the impacts on coaching effectiveness

Research into workplace-training suggests actions taken by managers, such as discussing applying the training, can significantly impact the effectiveness of training. However, little is known as to whether these findings translate to workplace-coaching. This mixed-methods study gathered information...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tamsin Webster
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Brookes University 2018-06-01
Series:International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring
Subjects:
Online Access:https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/file/693419a4-8435-46c6-9636-c98e4d870d6d/1/SP12-3%20Tamsin%20Webster.pdf
id doaj-437b529e26ff4ad8b80a411fc69a0a9a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-437b529e26ff4ad8b80a411fc69a0a9a2021-04-02T20:31:25ZengOxford Brookes UniversityInternational Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and MentoringXXXX-XXXX1741-83052018-06-01162415010.24384/000536Does managerial involvement in workplace coaching impact the outcome? A mixed-methods study into the current methods managers employ and the impacts on coaching effectivenessTamsin WebsterResearch into workplace-training suggests actions taken by managers, such as discussing applying the training, can significantly impact the effectiveness of training. However, little is known as to whether these findings translate to workplace-coaching. This mixed-methods study gathered information on current practices involving managers and the perceived effectiveness on the outcomes of coaching from coachees, managers and practitioners within the field. Those approaches that required discretionary effort as opposed to prescribed involvement were perceived to have a greater impact on coaching outcomes. There appeared to be no cumulative effect; more involvement did not translate to a perception of greater impact on outcomes.https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/file/693419a4-8435-46c6-9636-c98e4d870d6d/1/SP12-3%20Tamsin%20Webster.pdfworkplace-coachingmanagereffectivenessmixed-methodsoutcomes
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tamsin Webster
spellingShingle Tamsin Webster
Does managerial involvement in workplace coaching impact the outcome? A mixed-methods study into the current methods managers employ and the impacts on coaching effectiveness
International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring
workplace-coaching
manager
effectiveness
mixed-methods
outcomes
author_facet Tamsin Webster
author_sort Tamsin Webster
title Does managerial involvement in workplace coaching impact the outcome? A mixed-methods study into the current methods managers employ and the impacts on coaching effectiveness
title_short Does managerial involvement in workplace coaching impact the outcome? A mixed-methods study into the current methods managers employ and the impacts on coaching effectiveness
title_full Does managerial involvement in workplace coaching impact the outcome? A mixed-methods study into the current methods managers employ and the impacts on coaching effectiveness
title_fullStr Does managerial involvement in workplace coaching impact the outcome? A mixed-methods study into the current methods managers employ and the impacts on coaching effectiveness
title_full_unstemmed Does managerial involvement in workplace coaching impact the outcome? A mixed-methods study into the current methods managers employ and the impacts on coaching effectiveness
title_sort does managerial involvement in workplace coaching impact the outcome? a mixed-methods study into the current methods managers employ and the impacts on coaching effectiveness
publisher Oxford Brookes University
series International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring
issn XXXX-XXXX
1741-8305
publishDate 2018-06-01
description Research into workplace-training suggests actions taken by managers, such as discussing applying the training, can significantly impact the effectiveness of training. However, little is known as to whether these findings translate to workplace-coaching. This mixed-methods study gathered information on current practices involving managers and the perceived effectiveness on the outcomes of coaching from coachees, managers and practitioners within the field. Those approaches that required discretionary effort as opposed to prescribed involvement were perceived to have a greater impact on coaching outcomes. There appeared to be no cumulative effect; more involvement did not translate to a perception of greater impact on outcomes.
topic workplace-coaching
manager
effectiveness
mixed-methods
outcomes
url https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/file/693419a4-8435-46c6-9636-c98e4d870d6d/1/SP12-3%20Tamsin%20Webster.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tamsinwebster doesmanagerialinvolvementinworkplacecoachingimpacttheoutcomeamixedmethodsstudyintothecurrentmethodsmanagersemployandtheimpactsoncoachingeffectiveness
_version_ 1721546991762145280