Comparison and consolidation of microarray data sets of human tissue expression

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Human tissue displays a remarkable diversity in structure and function. To understand how such diversity emerges from the same DNA, systematic measurements of gene expression across different tissues in the human body are essential....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Futschik Matthias E, Russ Jenny
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-05-01
Series:BMC Genomics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/11/305
id doaj-437989bbcf1d4605a563b1020dd53fe5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-437989bbcf1d4605a563b1020dd53fe52020-11-25T00:29:57ZengBMCBMC Genomics1471-21642010-05-0111130510.1186/1471-2164-11-305Comparison and consolidation of microarray data sets of human tissue expressionFutschik Matthias ERuss Jenny<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Human tissue displays a remarkable diversity in structure and function. To understand how such diversity emerges from the same DNA, systematic measurements of gene expression across different tissues in the human body are essential. Several recent studies addressed this formidable task using microarray technologies. These large tissue expression data sets have provided us an important basis for biomedical research. However, it is well known that microarray data can be compromised by high noise level and various experimental artefacts. Critical comparison of different data sets can help to reveal such errors and to avoid pitfalls in their application.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We present here the first comparison and integration of four freely available tissue expression data sets generated using three different microarray platforms and containing a total of 377 microarray hybridizations. When assessing the tissue expression of genes, we found that the results considerably depend on the chosen data set. Nevertheless, the comparison also revealed statistically significant similarity of gene expression profiles across different platforms. This enabled us to construct consolidated lists of platform-independent tissue-specific genes using a set of complementary measures. Follow-up analyses showed that results based on consolidated data tend to be more reliable.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our study strongly indicates that the consolidation of the four different tissue expression data sets can increase data quality and can lead to biologically more meaningful results. The provided compendium of platform-independent gene lists should facilitate the identification of novel tissue-specific marker genes.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/11/305
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Futschik Matthias E
Russ Jenny
spellingShingle Futschik Matthias E
Russ Jenny
Comparison and consolidation of microarray data sets of human tissue expression
BMC Genomics
author_facet Futschik Matthias E
Russ Jenny
author_sort Futschik Matthias E
title Comparison and consolidation of microarray data sets of human tissue expression
title_short Comparison and consolidation of microarray data sets of human tissue expression
title_full Comparison and consolidation of microarray data sets of human tissue expression
title_fullStr Comparison and consolidation of microarray data sets of human tissue expression
title_full_unstemmed Comparison and consolidation of microarray data sets of human tissue expression
title_sort comparison and consolidation of microarray data sets of human tissue expression
publisher BMC
series BMC Genomics
issn 1471-2164
publishDate 2010-05-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Human tissue displays a remarkable diversity in structure and function. To understand how such diversity emerges from the same DNA, systematic measurements of gene expression across different tissues in the human body are essential. Several recent studies addressed this formidable task using microarray technologies. These large tissue expression data sets have provided us an important basis for biomedical research. However, it is well known that microarray data can be compromised by high noise level and various experimental artefacts. Critical comparison of different data sets can help to reveal such errors and to avoid pitfalls in their application.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We present here the first comparison and integration of four freely available tissue expression data sets generated using three different microarray platforms and containing a total of 377 microarray hybridizations. When assessing the tissue expression of genes, we found that the results considerably depend on the chosen data set. Nevertheless, the comparison also revealed statistically significant similarity of gene expression profiles across different platforms. This enabled us to construct consolidated lists of platform-independent tissue-specific genes using a set of complementary measures. Follow-up analyses showed that results based on consolidated data tend to be more reliable.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our study strongly indicates that the consolidation of the four different tissue expression data sets can increase data quality and can lead to biologically more meaningful results. The provided compendium of platform-independent gene lists should facilitate the identification of novel tissue-specific marker genes.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/11/305
work_keys_str_mv AT futschikmatthiase comparisonandconsolidationofmicroarraydatasetsofhumantissueexpression
AT russjenny comparisonandconsolidationofmicroarraydatasetsofhumantissueexpression
_version_ 1725328812940460032