Historicizing vulnerability: place-names, risk and memory in the Mont Blanc area

This research puts forward what has been achieved about the findings of a research I am currently conducting in the Aosta Valley, a francophone region in the North Western Alps of Italy, regarding the relation which links history, risk, disasters, environment and human vulnerability. The focus of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Elisabetta Dall’Ò
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIMS Press 2019-07-01
Series:AIMS Geosciences
Online Access:https://www.aimspress.com/article/10.3934/geosci.2019.3.493/fulltext.html
id doaj-4376f8f683404e8b8b37dbc1942b64ac
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4376f8f683404e8b8b37dbc1942b64ac2020-11-24T20:51:32ZengAIMS PressAIMS Geosciences2471-21322019-07-015349350810.3934/geosci.2019.3.493Historicizing vulnerability: place-names, risk and memory in the Mont Blanc areaElisabetta Dall’Ò0Research Fellow in Anthropology, Department of Cultures, Politics and Society, University of Turin Turin, ItalyThis research puts forward what has been achieved about the findings of a research I am currently conducting in the Aosta Valley, a francophone region in the North Western Alps of Italy, regarding the relation which links history, risk, disasters, environment and human vulnerability. The focus of this work, based on place-names, is to prove how social vulnerability is rooted into the landscapes, in its history, and in its memory-scapes. It is common knowledge that the act of naming places is in fact a way to control and infuse space, with particular belief-systems and values. As Nash and Robinson argued, the specific context of place-naming came to be considered as an “essential human undertaking” to signify cultural or social meaning in the experienced world, and toponyms came to be understood as matrices of language and the various cultural elements, including landscape, which compose a society’s way of life. Toponyms potentially are able to “transform the sheerly physical and geographical into something historically and socially experienced”, as Tilley states. Place-names are also depositories of the knowledge that ancestors had given to such places. For this reason, the information embedded in place-names can be used to implement the scientific understanding of such “natural phenomena”. Some ancient toponyms in the Valley of Aosta maintain a significance related to “natural hazards”, or to potential disasters. These ancient local toponyms used to connect people to the land, keeping relationships with ecology, geology, fauna, flora and material culture. Nowadays this connection has mainly been lost: people are still re-building and re-inhabiting the same “risk places”, avoiding history. To historicize vulnerability signifies to renegotiate the collective memory and the socio-spatial identities, by allowing the dialogue between past and future.https://www.aimspress.com/article/10.3934/geosci.2019.3.493/fulltext.html
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elisabetta Dall’Ò
spellingShingle Elisabetta Dall’Ò
Historicizing vulnerability: place-names, risk and memory in the Mont Blanc area
AIMS Geosciences
author_facet Elisabetta Dall’Ò
author_sort Elisabetta Dall’Ò
title Historicizing vulnerability: place-names, risk and memory in the Mont Blanc area
title_short Historicizing vulnerability: place-names, risk and memory in the Mont Blanc area
title_full Historicizing vulnerability: place-names, risk and memory in the Mont Blanc area
title_fullStr Historicizing vulnerability: place-names, risk and memory in the Mont Blanc area
title_full_unstemmed Historicizing vulnerability: place-names, risk and memory in the Mont Blanc area
title_sort historicizing vulnerability: place-names, risk and memory in the mont blanc area
publisher AIMS Press
series AIMS Geosciences
issn 2471-2132
publishDate 2019-07-01
description This research puts forward what has been achieved about the findings of a research I am currently conducting in the Aosta Valley, a francophone region in the North Western Alps of Italy, regarding the relation which links history, risk, disasters, environment and human vulnerability. The focus of this work, based on place-names, is to prove how social vulnerability is rooted into the landscapes, in its history, and in its memory-scapes. It is common knowledge that the act of naming places is in fact a way to control and infuse space, with particular belief-systems and values. As Nash and Robinson argued, the specific context of place-naming came to be considered as an “essential human undertaking” to signify cultural or social meaning in the experienced world, and toponyms came to be understood as matrices of language and the various cultural elements, including landscape, which compose a society’s way of life. Toponyms potentially are able to “transform the sheerly physical and geographical into something historically and socially experienced”, as Tilley states. Place-names are also depositories of the knowledge that ancestors had given to such places. For this reason, the information embedded in place-names can be used to implement the scientific understanding of such “natural phenomena”. Some ancient toponyms in the Valley of Aosta maintain a significance related to “natural hazards”, or to potential disasters. These ancient local toponyms used to connect people to the land, keeping relationships with ecology, geology, fauna, flora and material culture. Nowadays this connection has mainly been lost: people are still re-building and re-inhabiting the same “risk places”, avoiding history. To historicize vulnerability signifies to renegotiate the collective memory and the socio-spatial identities, by allowing the dialogue between past and future.
url https://www.aimspress.com/article/10.3934/geosci.2019.3.493/fulltext.html
work_keys_str_mv AT elisabettadallo historicizingvulnerabilityplacenamesriskandmemoryinthemontblancarea
_version_ 1716801917549543424