Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal

Abstract Objective: To evaluate a child development surveillance tool proposal to be used in primary care, with simultaneous use of the Denver II scale. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 282 infants aged up to 36 months, enrolled in a public daycare in a countryside community in Rio Gra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Renato Coelho, José Paulo Ferreira, Ricardo Sukiennik, Ricardo Halpern
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier
Series:Jornal de Pediatria
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572016000600505&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-4360380833f04fb1bab4229558fb8296
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4360380833f04fb1bab4229558fb82962020-11-24T23:35:52ZengElsevierJornal de Pediatria1678-478292550551110.1016/j.jped.2015.12.006S0021-75572016000600505Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposalRenato CoelhoJosé Paulo FerreiraRicardo SukiennikRicardo HalpernAbstract Objective: To evaluate a child development surveillance tool proposal to be used in primary care, with simultaneous use of the Denver II scale. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 282 infants aged up to 36 months, enrolled in a public daycare in a countryside community in Rio Grande do Sul/Brazil. Child development was assessed using the surveillance tool and the Denver II scale. Results: The prevalence of probable developmental delay was 53%; most of these cases were in the alert group and 24% had normal development, but with risk factors. At the Denver scale, the prevalence of suspected developmental delay was 32%. When risk factors and sociodemographic variables were assessed, no significant difference was observed. Conclusion: The evaluation of this surveillance tool resulted in objective and comparable data, which were adequate for a screening test. It is easily applicable as a screening tool, even though it was originally designed as a surveillance tool. The inclusion of risk factors to the scoring system is an innovation that allows for the identification of children with suspected delay in addition to developmental milestones, although the definition of parameters and choice of indicators should be thoroughly studied.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572016000600505&lng=en&tlng=enChild developmentScreeningRisk factors
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Renato Coelho
José Paulo Ferreira
Ricardo Sukiennik
Ricardo Halpern
spellingShingle Renato Coelho
José Paulo Ferreira
Ricardo Sukiennik
Ricardo Halpern
Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal
Jornal de Pediatria
Child development
Screening
Risk factors
author_facet Renato Coelho
José Paulo Ferreira
Ricardo Sukiennik
Ricardo Halpern
author_sort Renato Coelho
title Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal
title_short Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal
title_full Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal
title_fullStr Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal
title_full_unstemmed Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal
title_sort child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal
publisher Elsevier
series Jornal de Pediatria
issn 1678-4782
description Abstract Objective: To evaluate a child development surveillance tool proposal to be used in primary care, with simultaneous use of the Denver II scale. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 282 infants aged up to 36 months, enrolled in a public daycare in a countryside community in Rio Grande do Sul/Brazil. Child development was assessed using the surveillance tool and the Denver II scale. Results: The prevalence of probable developmental delay was 53%; most of these cases were in the alert group and 24% had normal development, but with risk factors. At the Denver scale, the prevalence of suspected developmental delay was 32%. When risk factors and sociodemographic variables were assessed, no significant difference was observed. Conclusion: The evaluation of this surveillance tool resulted in objective and comparable data, which were adequate for a screening test. It is easily applicable as a screening tool, even though it was originally designed as a surveillance tool. The inclusion of risk factors to the scoring system is an innovation that allows for the identification of children with suspected delay in addition to developmental milestones, although the definition of parameters and choice of indicators should be thoroughly studied.
topic Child development
Screening
Risk factors
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572016000600505&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT renatocoelho childdevelopmentinprimarycareasurveillanceproposal
AT josepauloferreira childdevelopmentinprimarycareasurveillanceproposal
AT ricardosukiennik childdevelopmentinprimarycareasurveillanceproposal
AT ricardohalpern childdevelopmentinprimarycareasurveillanceproposal
_version_ 1725524322608480256