ABOUT LIFELONG AND REAL LIFELONG SENTENCE – (SEMI)PERMEABILITY OF THEORY AND PRACTICE – SUPRANATIONAL JUDICIAL APPROACH BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Annoying moreover disturbing situation has been formed around since the total abolition of death penalty in the countries forming High Contracting Parties of the European Convention on Human Rights (47 States). Different pros and cons has been raising ever since. Whether there might be a supplementa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Katona Tibor
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria 2018-12-01
Series:Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/35838
id doaj-43493ac4ba924ae5842798d5edcda625
record_format Article
spelling doaj-43493ac4ba924ae5842798d5edcda6252020-11-25T03:14:57ZporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaRevista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM1981-36941981-36942018-12-011331232124410.5902/198136943583815881ABOUT LIFELONG AND REAL LIFELONG SENTENCE – (SEMI)PERMEABILITY OF THEORY AND PRACTICE – SUPRANATIONAL JUDICIAL APPROACH BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTSKatona Tibor0University of Science in Szeged, Hungary.Annoying moreover disturbing situation has been formed around since the total abolition of death penalty in the countries forming High Contracting Parties of the European Convention on Human Rights (47 States). Different pros and cons has been raising ever since. Whether there might be a supplementary penalty for the most brutal, torture-like and cruel felonies having been committed mainly for innocent human beings depriving their life in aggravated forms? The answer is: ’yep’…..with a lot of barriers, preconditions and prerequisits. Thinking deeply about deprivation of liberty for the whole life of the defendant/convicted whether the State is empowered to do that? The judiciary of the European Court of Human Rights (in Strasbourg/France) itself could not answer consequently the eagerly rampant question: the Vinter Case and afterwards the Hutchinson case have formed controversial enforcement-compromising viewpoints. Hungary has introduced a very special legal remedy giving back the hope to be released – even conditionally: - after spending 40 years imprisonment a strictly formed National Commision is being entitled to revise the convicted person’s behaviour and attitude demonstrated during the imprisonment and presuming whether he/she might be returned to the normal society…..heavy duty for the Commission and heavy precondition for the imprisoned person. The essay tries to clarify why it has been so hard to achieve a more or less compromise solution in order to comply with the Convention’s spirit and written text. Enjoy and form You own opinion.https://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/35838convenção europeia de direitos humanospena de morteabolição.
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Katona Tibor
spellingShingle Katona Tibor
ABOUT LIFELONG AND REAL LIFELONG SENTENCE – (SEMI)PERMEABILITY OF THEORY AND PRACTICE – SUPRANATIONAL JUDICIAL APPROACH BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
convenção europeia de direitos humanos
pena de morte
abolição.
author_facet Katona Tibor
author_sort Katona Tibor
title ABOUT LIFELONG AND REAL LIFELONG SENTENCE – (SEMI)PERMEABILITY OF THEORY AND PRACTICE – SUPRANATIONAL JUDICIAL APPROACH BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
title_short ABOUT LIFELONG AND REAL LIFELONG SENTENCE – (SEMI)PERMEABILITY OF THEORY AND PRACTICE – SUPRANATIONAL JUDICIAL APPROACH BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
title_full ABOUT LIFELONG AND REAL LIFELONG SENTENCE – (SEMI)PERMEABILITY OF THEORY AND PRACTICE – SUPRANATIONAL JUDICIAL APPROACH BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
title_fullStr ABOUT LIFELONG AND REAL LIFELONG SENTENCE – (SEMI)PERMEABILITY OF THEORY AND PRACTICE – SUPRANATIONAL JUDICIAL APPROACH BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
title_full_unstemmed ABOUT LIFELONG AND REAL LIFELONG SENTENCE – (SEMI)PERMEABILITY OF THEORY AND PRACTICE – SUPRANATIONAL JUDICIAL APPROACH BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
title_sort about lifelong and real lifelong sentence – (semi)permeability of theory and practice – supranational judicial approach by the european court of human rights
publisher Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
series Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
issn 1981-3694
1981-3694
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Annoying moreover disturbing situation has been formed around since the total abolition of death penalty in the countries forming High Contracting Parties of the European Convention on Human Rights (47 States). Different pros and cons has been raising ever since. Whether there might be a supplementary penalty for the most brutal, torture-like and cruel felonies having been committed mainly for innocent human beings depriving their life in aggravated forms? The answer is: ’yep’…..with a lot of barriers, preconditions and prerequisits. Thinking deeply about deprivation of liberty for the whole life of the defendant/convicted whether the State is empowered to do that? The judiciary of the European Court of Human Rights (in Strasbourg/France) itself could not answer consequently the eagerly rampant question: the Vinter Case and afterwards the Hutchinson case have formed controversial enforcement-compromising viewpoints. Hungary has introduced a very special legal remedy giving back the hope to be released – even conditionally: - after spending 40 years imprisonment a strictly formed National Commision is being entitled to revise the convicted person’s behaviour and attitude demonstrated during the imprisonment and presuming whether he/she might be returned to the normal society…..heavy duty for the Commission and heavy precondition for the imprisoned person. The essay tries to clarify why it has been so hard to achieve a more or less compromise solution in order to comply with the Convention’s spirit and written text. Enjoy and form You own opinion.
topic convenção europeia de direitos humanos
pena de morte
abolição.
url https://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/35838
work_keys_str_mv AT katonatibor aboutlifelongandreallifelongsentencesemipermeabilityoftheoryandpracticesupranationaljudicialapproachbytheeuropeancourtofhumanrights
_version_ 1724641435758624768