Domestic Socioeconomic Barriers to Hydropower Trading: Evidence from Bhutan and Nepal

Bhutan has increased exports of surplus hydropower generation, whereas Nepal has been suffering from domestic power shortages. Why has Bhutan successfully promoted hydropower development and exports, while Nepal has failed to do so? This paper focuses on inherent development barriers that stem from...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kaoru Ogino, Mikiyasu Nakayama, Daisuke Sasaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-04-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2062
id doaj-4347b6f8b8f64def81e677b76d93ba7d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4347b6f8b8f64def81e677b76d93ba7d2020-11-24T22:28:49ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-04-01117206210.3390/su11072062su11072062Domestic Socioeconomic Barriers to Hydropower Trading: Evidence from Bhutan and NepalKaoru Ogino0Mikiyasu Nakayama1Daisuke Sasaki2Asian Development Bank, Manila 1550, PhilippinesGraduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Chiba 277-8563, JapanInternational Research Institute of Disaster Science, Tohoku University, 468-1 Aoba, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-0845, JapanBhutan has increased exports of surplus hydropower generation, whereas Nepal has been suffering from domestic power shortages. Why has Bhutan successfully promoted hydropower development and exports, while Nepal has failed to do so? This paper focuses on inherent development barriers that stem from domestic power supply, internal governance systems, and indigenous societal sensitivity. There are lessons to be learned from Bhutan’s practices that could be applied in Nepal. First, hydropower development can be severely affected by electricity scarcity that arises when power export is privileged over domestic power supply. Nepal has fallen into this negative loop, whereas Bhutan has overcome it through policy interventions that ensure visible links between power exports and domestic power consumption. Second, the sector reforms in the two countries contrast in terms of institutional, operational, and financial efficiency. Without fundamental reforms, Nepal’s sector-wide inefficiency fuels a vicious circle. Third, local resource conflicts and social complexities have made Nepal’s hydropower projects more complicated than Bhutan’s. In planning hydropower projects, it is crucial to pay careful attention to domestic stakeholders and local benefits. Planners and governments must ensure that projects are designed with extensive benefit sharing mechanisms, sustainable value chains, effective sector reforms, and sufficient societal conflict management.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2062Bhutanhunger exporthydropowerNepalpower export
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kaoru Ogino
Mikiyasu Nakayama
Daisuke Sasaki
spellingShingle Kaoru Ogino
Mikiyasu Nakayama
Daisuke Sasaki
Domestic Socioeconomic Barriers to Hydropower Trading: Evidence from Bhutan and Nepal
Sustainability
Bhutan
hunger export
hydropower
Nepal
power export
author_facet Kaoru Ogino
Mikiyasu Nakayama
Daisuke Sasaki
author_sort Kaoru Ogino
title Domestic Socioeconomic Barriers to Hydropower Trading: Evidence from Bhutan and Nepal
title_short Domestic Socioeconomic Barriers to Hydropower Trading: Evidence from Bhutan and Nepal
title_full Domestic Socioeconomic Barriers to Hydropower Trading: Evidence from Bhutan and Nepal
title_fullStr Domestic Socioeconomic Barriers to Hydropower Trading: Evidence from Bhutan and Nepal
title_full_unstemmed Domestic Socioeconomic Barriers to Hydropower Trading: Evidence from Bhutan and Nepal
title_sort domestic socioeconomic barriers to hydropower trading: evidence from bhutan and nepal
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Bhutan has increased exports of surplus hydropower generation, whereas Nepal has been suffering from domestic power shortages. Why has Bhutan successfully promoted hydropower development and exports, while Nepal has failed to do so? This paper focuses on inherent development barriers that stem from domestic power supply, internal governance systems, and indigenous societal sensitivity. There are lessons to be learned from Bhutan’s practices that could be applied in Nepal. First, hydropower development can be severely affected by electricity scarcity that arises when power export is privileged over domestic power supply. Nepal has fallen into this negative loop, whereas Bhutan has overcome it through policy interventions that ensure visible links between power exports and domestic power consumption. Second, the sector reforms in the two countries contrast in terms of institutional, operational, and financial efficiency. Without fundamental reforms, Nepal’s sector-wide inefficiency fuels a vicious circle. Third, local resource conflicts and social complexities have made Nepal’s hydropower projects more complicated than Bhutan’s. In planning hydropower projects, it is crucial to pay careful attention to domestic stakeholders and local benefits. Planners and governments must ensure that projects are designed with extensive benefit sharing mechanisms, sustainable value chains, effective sector reforms, and sufficient societal conflict management.
topic Bhutan
hunger export
hydropower
Nepal
power export
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2062
work_keys_str_mv AT kaoruogino domesticsocioeconomicbarrierstohydropowertradingevidencefrombhutanandnepal
AT mikiyasunakayama domesticsocioeconomicbarrierstohydropowertradingevidencefrombhutanandnepal
AT daisukesasaki domesticsocioeconomicbarrierstohydropowertradingevidencefrombhutanandnepal
_version_ 1725746205344923648