Mental Simulations of Phonological Representations Are Causally Linked to Silent Reading of Direct Versus Indirect Speech

Embodied theories propose that language is understood via mental simulations of sensory states related to perception and action. Given that direct speech (e.g., 'She says, “It’s a lovely day!”') is perceived to be more vivid than indirect speech (e.g., 'She says (that) it’s a lovely d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bo Yao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/141
id doaj-430e2e08489644a1ba89ae20384d9be6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-430e2e08489644a1ba89ae20384d9be62021-02-11T07:01:18ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Cognition2514-48202021-01-014110.5334/joc.141153Mental Simulations of Phonological Representations Are Causally Linked to Silent Reading of Direct Versus Indirect SpeechBo Yao0Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of ManchesterEmbodied theories propose that language is understood via mental simulations of sensory states related to perception and action. Given that direct speech (e.g., 'She says, “It’s a lovely day!”') is perceived to be more vivid than indirect speech (e.g., 'She says (that) it’s a lovely day') in perception, recent research shows in silent reading that more vivid speech representations are mentally simulated for direct speech than for indirect speech. This ‘simulated’ speech is found to contain suprasegmental prosodic representations (e.g., speech prosody) but its phonological detail and its causal role in silent reading of direct speech remain unclear. Here in three experiments, I explored the phonological aspect and the causal role of speech simulations in silent reading of tongue twisters in direct speech, indirect speech and non-speech sentences. The results demonstrated greater visual tongue-twister effects (phonemic interference) during silent reading (Experiment 1) but not oral reading (Experiment 2) of direct speech as compared to indirect speech and non-speech. The tongue-twister effects in silent reading of direct speech were selectively disrupted by phonological interference (concurrent articulation) as compared to manual interference (finger tapping) (Experiment 3). The results replicated more vivid speech simulations in silent reading of direct speech, and additionally extended them to the phonological dimension. Crucially, they demonstrated a causal role of phonological simulations in silent reading of direct speech, at least in tongue-twister reading. The findings are discussed in relation to multidimensionality and task dependence of mental simulation and its mechanisms.https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/141sentence processingsemanticsreadingeye movementsembodied cognitiondiscourse processing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bo Yao
spellingShingle Bo Yao
Mental Simulations of Phonological Representations Are Causally Linked to Silent Reading of Direct Versus Indirect Speech
Journal of Cognition
sentence processing
semantics
reading
eye movements
embodied cognition
discourse processing
author_facet Bo Yao
author_sort Bo Yao
title Mental Simulations of Phonological Representations Are Causally Linked to Silent Reading of Direct Versus Indirect Speech
title_short Mental Simulations of Phonological Representations Are Causally Linked to Silent Reading of Direct Versus Indirect Speech
title_full Mental Simulations of Phonological Representations Are Causally Linked to Silent Reading of Direct Versus Indirect Speech
title_fullStr Mental Simulations of Phonological Representations Are Causally Linked to Silent Reading of Direct Versus Indirect Speech
title_full_unstemmed Mental Simulations of Phonological Representations Are Causally Linked to Silent Reading of Direct Versus Indirect Speech
title_sort mental simulations of phonological representations are causally linked to silent reading of direct versus indirect speech
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Journal of Cognition
issn 2514-4820
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Embodied theories propose that language is understood via mental simulations of sensory states related to perception and action. Given that direct speech (e.g., 'She says, “It’s a lovely day!”') is perceived to be more vivid than indirect speech (e.g., 'She says (that) it’s a lovely day') in perception, recent research shows in silent reading that more vivid speech representations are mentally simulated for direct speech than for indirect speech. This ‘simulated’ speech is found to contain suprasegmental prosodic representations (e.g., speech prosody) but its phonological detail and its causal role in silent reading of direct speech remain unclear. Here in three experiments, I explored the phonological aspect and the causal role of speech simulations in silent reading of tongue twisters in direct speech, indirect speech and non-speech sentences. The results demonstrated greater visual tongue-twister effects (phonemic interference) during silent reading (Experiment 1) but not oral reading (Experiment 2) of direct speech as compared to indirect speech and non-speech. The tongue-twister effects in silent reading of direct speech were selectively disrupted by phonological interference (concurrent articulation) as compared to manual interference (finger tapping) (Experiment 3). The results replicated more vivid speech simulations in silent reading of direct speech, and additionally extended them to the phonological dimension. Crucially, they demonstrated a causal role of phonological simulations in silent reading of direct speech, at least in tongue-twister reading. The findings are discussed in relation to multidimensionality and task dependence of mental simulation and its mechanisms.
topic sentence processing
semantics
reading
eye movements
embodied cognition
discourse processing
url https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/141
work_keys_str_mv AT boyao mentalsimulationsofphonologicalrepresentationsarecausallylinkedtosilentreadingofdirectversusindirectspeech
_version_ 1724274425688227840