Hypnotic communication for periprocedural analgesia during transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
Introduction: Hypnosis is a therapeutic strategy for pain control. We aimed at investigating the use of this technique in a large population undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Methods: 70 consecutive AF patients referred for transcatheter ablation, underwent hypnotic communication for per...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2019-09-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Cardiology: Heart & Vasculature |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906719301101 |
id |
doaj-42faf639a1804134bad84b87c704c109 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-42faf639a1804134bad84b87c704c1092020-11-25T01:33:55ZengElsevierInternational Journal of Cardiology: Heart & Vasculature2352-90672019-09-0124Hypnotic communication for periprocedural analgesia during transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillationM. Scaglione0A. Battaglia1P. Di Donna2M. Peyracchia3B. Bolzan4P. Mazzucchi5M. Muro6D. Caponi7Division of Cardiology, Cardinal G. Massaia Hospital, Asti, Italy; Corresponding author at: Division of Cardiology, Cardinal G. Massaia Hospital, C.so Dante 202, Asti 14100, Italy.Division of Cardiology, Cardinal G. Massaia Hospital, Asti, ItalyDivision of Cardiology, Cardinal G. Massaia Hospital, Asti, ItalyDivision of Cardiology, Cardinal G. Massaia Hospital, Asti, ItalyDivision of Cardiology, Cardinal G. Massaia Hospital, Asti, ItalyDivision of Cardiology, Cardinal G. Massaia Hospital, Asti, ItalyPain Therapy and Palliative Care, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Citta` della Salute e della Scienza di TorinoDivision of Cardiology, Cardinal G. Massaia Hospital, Asti, ItalyIntroduction: Hypnosis is a therapeutic strategy for pain control. We aimed at investigating the use of this technique in a large population undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Methods: 70 consecutive AF patients referred for transcatheter ablation, underwent hypnotic communication for periprocedural analgesia (Group A), were compared with 70 patients undergoing conventional analgesia (Group B). Procedural data, anxiety, perceived pain, perceived procedural duration and the dosages of administered analgesic drugs were compared using validated score scales. Results: Hypnotic communication (Group A) resulted in a significant procedural-related anxiety reduction (Pre procedural 4.7 ± 2.9 Vs Intra Procedural 0.8 ± 1.2, P < 0.001) and perceived procedural duration (Real length 108 ± 33 min Vs Perceived Length 77 ± 39 min, P < 0.001). Group A patients reported a painless procedure in 78% (Pain scale ≤2). Regarding analgesic drug, Group A used only Fentanyl and Paracetamol. The Fentanyl dosage was similar in Group A and B (mean 0.142 Vs 0.146 mg, P = 0.65) while higher Paracetamol dosage was reported in Group A (mean 853 Vs 337 mg, P < 0.001). Group B also used Midazolam (mean 1.8 mg), Propofol (mean 43.8 mg) and narcosis was required in 2 patients. Total radiofrequency (RF) delivered time did not differ between the two groups (mean 28.9 Vs 27.6 min, P = 0.623) as well as mean RF power (mean 35.3 Vs 35.5 W, P = 0.424). No complications occurred. Conclusion: Hypnotic communication during AF ablation was related to a significant reduction of intra-procedural anxiety, perceived pain, procedural analgesic drugs dosage and perceived procedural duration without affecting total RF delivered time and procedural safety. Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, Ablation, Hypnosishttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906719301101 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
M. Scaglione A. Battaglia P. Di Donna M. Peyracchia B. Bolzan P. Mazzucchi M. Muro D. Caponi |
spellingShingle |
M. Scaglione A. Battaglia P. Di Donna M. Peyracchia B. Bolzan P. Mazzucchi M. Muro D. Caponi Hypnotic communication for periprocedural analgesia during transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation International Journal of Cardiology: Heart & Vasculature |
author_facet |
M. Scaglione A. Battaglia P. Di Donna M. Peyracchia B. Bolzan P. Mazzucchi M. Muro D. Caponi |
author_sort |
M. Scaglione |
title |
Hypnotic communication for periprocedural analgesia during transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation |
title_short |
Hypnotic communication for periprocedural analgesia during transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation |
title_full |
Hypnotic communication for periprocedural analgesia during transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation |
title_fullStr |
Hypnotic communication for periprocedural analgesia during transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hypnotic communication for periprocedural analgesia during transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation |
title_sort |
hypnotic communication for periprocedural analgesia during transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
International Journal of Cardiology: Heart & Vasculature |
issn |
2352-9067 |
publishDate |
2019-09-01 |
description |
Introduction: Hypnosis is a therapeutic strategy for pain control. We aimed at investigating the use of this technique in a large population undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Methods: 70 consecutive AF patients referred for transcatheter ablation, underwent hypnotic communication for periprocedural analgesia (Group A), were compared with 70 patients undergoing conventional analgesia (Group B). Procedural data, anxiety, perceived pain, perceived procedural duration and the dosages of administered analgesic drugs were compared using validated score scales. Results: Hypnotic communication (Group A) resulted in a significant procedural-related anxiety reduction (Pre procedural 4.7 ± 2.9 Vs Intra Procedural 0.8 ± 1.2, P < 0.001) and perceived procedural duration (Real length 108 ± 33 min Vs Perceived Length 77 ± 39 min, P < 0.001). Group A patients reported a painless procedure in 78% (Pain scale ≤2). Regarding analgesic drug, Group A used only Fentanyl and Paracetamol. The Fentanyl dosage was similar in Group A and B (mean 0.142 Vs 0.146 mg, P = 0.65) while higher Paracetamol dosage was reported in Group A (mean 853 Vs 337 mg, P < 0.001). Group B also used Midazolam (mean 1.8 mg), Propofol (mean 43.8 mg) and narcosis was required in 2 patients. Total radiofrequency (RF) delivered time did not differ between the two groups (mean 28.9 Vs 27.6 min, P = 0.623) as well as mean RF power (mean 35.3 Vs 35.5 W, P = 0.424). No complications occurred. Conclusion: Hypnotic communication during AF ablation was related to a significant reduction of intra-procedural anxiety, perceived pain, procedural analgesic drugs dosage and perceived procedural duration without affecting total RF delivered time and procedural safety. Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, Ablation, Hypnosis |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906719301101 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mscaglione hypnoticcommunicationforperiproceduralanalgesiaduringtranscatheterablationofatrialfibrillation AT abattaglia hypnoticcommunicationforperiproceduralanalgesiaduringtranscatheterablationofatrialfibrillation AT pdidonna hypnoticcommunicationforperiproceduralanalgesiaduringtranscatheterablationofatrialfibrillation AT mpeyracchia hypnoticcommunicationforperiproceduralanalgesiaduringtranscatheterablationofatrialfibrillation AT bbolzan hypnoticcommunicationforperiproceduralanalgesiaduringtranscatheterablationofatrialfibrillation AT pmazzucchi hypnoticcommunicationforperiproceduralanalgesiaduringtranscatheterablationofatrialfibrillation AT mmuro hypnoticcommunicationforperiproceduralanalgesiaduringtranscatheterablationofatrialfibrillation AT dcaponi hypnoticcommunicationforperiproceduralanalgesiaduringtranscatheterablationofatrialfibrillation |
_version_ |
1725074977715126272 |