Hypnotic communication for periprocedural analgesia during transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

Introduction: Hypnosis is a therapeutic strategy for pain control. We aimed at investigating the use of this technique in a large population undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Methods: 70 consecutive AF patients referred for transcatheter ablation, underwent hypnotic communication for per...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Scaglione, A. Battaglia, P. Di Donna, M. Peyracchia, B. Bolzan, P. Mazzucchi, M. Muro, D. Caponi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-09-01
Series:International Journal of Cardiology: Heart & Vasculature
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906719301101
id doaj-42faf639a1804134bad84b87c704c109
record_format Article
spelling doaj-42faf639a1804134bad84b87c704c1092020-11-25T01:33:55ZengElsevierInternational Journal of Cardiology: Heart & Vasculature2352-90672019-09-0124Hypnotic communication for periprocedural analgesia during transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillationM. Scaglione0A. Battaglia1P. Di Donna2M. Peyracchia3B. Bolzan4P. Mazzucchi5M. Muro6D. Caponi7Division of Cardiology, Cardinal G. Massaia Hospital, Asti, Italy; Corresponding author at: Division of Cardiology, Cardinal G. Massaia Hospital, C.so Dante 202, Asti 14100, Italy.Division of Cardiology, Cardinal G. Massaia Hospital, Asti, ItalyDivision of Cardiology, Cardinal G. Massaia Hospital, Asti, ItalyDivision of Cardiology, Cardinal G. Massaia Hospital, Asti, ItalyDivision of Cardiology, Cardinal G. Massaia Hospital, Asti, ItalyDivision of Cardiology, Cardinal G. Massaia Hospital, Asti, ItalyPain Therapy and Palliative Care, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Citta` della Salute e della Scienza di TorinoDivision of Cardiology, Cardinal G. Massaia Hospital, Asti, ItalyIntroduction: Hypnosis is a therapeutic strategy for pain control. We aimed at investigating the use of this technique in a large population undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Methods: 70 consecutive AF patients referred for transcatheter ablation, underwent hypnotic communication for periprocedural analgesia (Group A), were compared with 70 patients undergoing conventional analgesia (Group B). Procedural data, anxiety, perceived pain, perceived procedural duration and the dosages of administered analgesic drugs were compared using validated score scales. Results: Hypnotic communication (Group A) resulted in a significant procedural-related anxiety reduction (Pre procedural 4.7 ± 2.9 Vs Intra Procedural 0.8 ± 1.2, P < 0.001) and perceived procedural duration (Real length 108 ± 33 min Vs Perceived Length 77 ± 39 min, P < 0.001). Group A patients reported a painless procedure in 78% (Pain scale ≤2). Regarding analgesic drug, Group A used only Fentanyl and Paracetamol. The Fentanyl dosage was similar in Group A and B (mean 0.142 Vs 0.146 mg, P = 0.65) while higher Paracetamol dosage was reported in Group A (mean 853 Vs 337 mg, P < 0.001). Group B also used Midazolam (mean 1.8 mg), Propofol (mean 43.8 mg) and narcosis was required in 2 patients. Total radiofrequency (RF) delivered time did not differ between the two groups (mean 28.9 Vs 27.6 min, P = 0.623) as well as mean RF power (mean 35.3 Vs 35.5 W, P = 0.424). No complications occurred. Conclusion: Hypnotic communication during AF ablation was related to a significant reduction of intra-procedural anxiety, perceived pain, procedural analgesic drugs dosage and perceived procedural duration without affecting total RF delivered time and procedural safety. Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, Ablation, Hypnosishttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906719301101
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. Scaglione
A. Battaglia
P. Di Donna
M. Peyracchia
B. Bolzan
P. Mazzucchi
M. Muro
D. Caponi
spellingShingle M. Scaglione
A. Battaglia
P. Di Donna
M. Peyracchia
B. Bolzan
P. Mazzucchi
M. Muro
D. Caponi
Hypnotic communication for periprocedural analgesia during transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
International Journal of Cardiology: Heart & Vasculature
author_facet M. Scaglione
A. Battaglia
P. Di Donna
M. Peyracchia
B. Bolzan
P. Mazzucchi
M. Muro
D. Caponi
author_sort M. Scaglione
title Hypnotic communication for periprocedural analgesia during transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
title_short Hypnotic communication for periprocedural analgesia during transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
title_full Hypnotic communication for periprocedural analgesia during transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
title_fullStr Hypnotic communication for periprocedural analgesia during transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Hypnotic communication for periprocedural analgesia during transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
title_sort hypnotic communication for periprocedural analgesia during transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
publisher Elsevier
series International Journal of Cardiology: Heart & Vasculature
issn 2352-9067
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Introduction: Hypnosis is a therapeutic strategy for pain control. We aimed at investigating the use of this technique in a large population undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Methods: 70 consecutive AF patients referred for transcatheter ablation, underwent hypnotic communication for periprocedural analgesia (Group A), were compared with 70 patients undergoing conventional analgesia (Group B). Procedural data, anxiety, perceived pain, perceived procedural duration and the dosages of administered analgesic drugs were compared using validated score scales. Results: Hypnotic communication (Group A) resulted in a significant procedural-related anxiety reduction (Pre procedural 4.7 ± 2.9 Vs Intra Procedural 0.8 ± 1.2, P < 0.001) and perceived procedural duration (Real length 108 ± 33 min Vs Perceived Length 77 ± 39 min, P < 0.001). Group A patients reported a painless procedure in 78% (Pain scale ≤2). Regarding analgesic drug, Group A used only Fentanyl and Paracetamol. The Fentanyl dosage was similar in Group A and B (mean 0.142 Vs 0.146 mg, P = 0.65) while higher Paracetamol dosage was reported in Group A (mean 853 Vs 337 mg, P < 0.001). Group B also used Midazolam (mean 1.8 mg), Propofol (mean 43.8 mg) and narcosis was required in 2 patients. Total radiofrequency (RF) delivered time did not differ between the two groups (mean 28.9 Vs 27.6 min, P = 0.623) as well as mean RF power (mean 35.3 Vs 35.5 W, P = 0.424). No complications occurred. Conclusion: Hypnotic communication during AF ablation was related to a significant reduction of intra-procedural anxiety, perceived pain, procedural analgesic drugs dosage and perceived procedural duration without affecting total RF delivered time and procedural safety. Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, Ablation, Hypnosis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906719301101
work_keys_str_mv AT mscaglione hypnoticcommunicationforperiproceduralanalgesiaduringtranscatheterablationofatrialfibrillation
AT abattaglia hypnoticcommunicationforperiproceduralanalgesiaduringtranscatheterablationofatrialfibrillation
AT pdidonna hypnoticcommunicationforperiproceduralanalgesiaduringtranscatheterablationofatrialfibrillation
AT mpeyracchia hypnoticcommunicationforperiproceduralanalgesiaduringtranscatheterablationofatrialfibrillation
AT bbolzan hypnoticcommunicationforperiproceduralanalgesiaduringtranscatheterablationofatrialfibrillation
AT pmazzucchi hypnoticcommunicationforperiproceduralanalgesiaduringtranscatheterablationofatrialfibrillation
AT mmuro hypnoticcommunicationforperiproceduralanalgesiaduringtranscatheterablationofatrialfibrillation
AT dcaponi hypnoticcommunicationforperiproceduralanalgesiaduringtranscatheterablationofatrialfibrillation
_version_ 1725074977715126272