The Chimeric Self: A Neo Naturalist Bundle Theory of the Self

In the contemporary cognitive science and philosophy of mind debate the definition of the ontology of the Self is difficult if not downright dubious. Thus, different theories aim to provide an account, especially where further neuroscientific research could be implemented. To this extent, the identi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lucrezia Compiani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00202/full
id doaj-42e8c20685924d0fb87cc9557d2d7112
record_format Article
spelling doaj-42e8c20685924d0fb87cc9557d2d71122020-11-24T23:17:58ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782019-02-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.00202408306The Chimeric Self: A Neo Naturalist Bundle Theory of the SelfLucrezia CompianiIn the contemporary cognitive science and philosophy of mind debate the definition of the ontology of the Self is difficult if not downright dubious. Thus, different theories aim to provide an account, especially where further neuroscientific research could be implemented. To this extent, the identity of the Self is suggested to be pinpointed by virtue of its specific set of mechanical features or brain functions, or it is considered the product of cognitive and conceptual capacities that build representations and narratives about ourselves. In this paper, I propose an alternative approach, based on the Spread Mind Theory (Manzotti, 2017a). Starting from the idea that the Self isn’t just an aprioristic or transcendental form, I claim, endorsing a Neo Naturalist approach, that our first-personal experience is identical to the external objects which, due to a physical relation, constitute the same experience. Thanks to an externalist explanation of the experience of the Self it is possible to avoid multiple ontologies, causal foundationalism, naïve materialism and questions begging about what we should explain. Clarifying the concept of the Self, as a bundle of relative objects which are identical with the experiences themselves, allows us to draw a physical ontology, based on the neutral (and natural) idea of relative existence rather than any posited concept of subjectivity.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00202/fullSelfNeo Naturalismidentityrelative existencefirst person experienceontology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lucrezia Compiani
spellingShingle Lucrezia Compiani
The Chimeric Self: A Neo Naturalist Bundle Theory of the Self
Frontiers in Psychology
Self
Neo Naturalism
identity
relative existence
first person experience
ontology
author_facet Lucrezia Compiani
author_sort Lucrezia Compiani
title The Chimeric Self: A Neo Naturalist Bundle Theory of the Self
title_short The Chimeric Self: A Neo Naturalist Bundle Theory of the Self
title_full The Chimeric Self: A Neo Naturalist Bundle Theory of the Self
title_fullStr The Chimeric Self: A Neo Naturalist Bundle Theory of the Self
title_full_unstemmed The Chimeric Self: A Neo Naturalist Bundle Theory of the Self
title_sort chimeric self: a neo naturalist bundle theory of the self
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2019-02-01
description In the contemporary cognitive science and philosophy of mind debate the definition of the ontology of the Self is difficult if not downright dubious. Thus, different theories aim to provide an account, especially where further neuroscientific research could be implemented. To this extent, the identity of the Self is suggested to be pinpointed by virtue of its specific set of mechanical features or brain functions, or it is considered the product of cognitive and conceptual capacities that build representations and narratives about ourselves. In this paper, I propose an alternative approach, based on the Spread Mind Theory (Manzotti, 2017a). Starting from the idea that the Self isn’t just an aprioristic or transcendental form, I claim, endorsing a Neo Naturalist approach, that our first-personal experience is identical to the external objects which, due to a physical relation, constitute the same experience. Thanks to an externalist explanation of the experience of the Self it is possible to avoid multiple ontologies, causal foundationalism, naïve materialism and questions begging about what we should explain. Clarifying the concept of the Self, as a bundle of relative objects which are identical with the experiences themselves, allows us to draw a physical ontology, based on the neutral (and natural) idea of relative existence rather than any posited concept of subjectivity.
topic Self
Neo Naturalism
identity
relative existence
first person experience
ontology
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00202/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lucreziacompiani thechimericselfaneonaturalistbundletheoryoftheself
AT lucreziacompiani chimericselfaneonaturalistbundletheoryoftheself
_version_ 1725582442436231168