′A Disgrace to a Farmer′: Conservation and Agriculture on a Nature Reserve in Islay, Scotland

This article is an investigation into contestations about the landscape of Loch Gruinart, a nature reserve managed by the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) on the Scottish island of Islay. Farmers argued that the low-lying areas of the reserve should have been farmed more intensively...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Whitehouse Andrew
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2009-01-01
Series:Conservation & Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2009;volume=7;issue=3;spage=165;epage=175;aulast=Whitehouse
id doaj-42dd2dfd8e564f5ab455cd86f5a0fde2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-42dd2dfd8e564f5ab455cd86f5a0fde22020-11-24T22:50:39ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsConservation & Society0972-49230975-31332009-01-0173165175′A Disgrace to a Farmer′: Conservation and Agriculture on a Nature Reserve in Islay, ScotlandWhitehouse AndrewThis article is an investigation into contestations about the landscape of Loch Gruinart, a nature reserve managed by the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) on the Scottish island of Islay. Farmers argued that the low-lying areas of the reserve should have been farmed more intensively to support higher numbers of geese, which farmers disliked because they caused damage to their own grass crops. Instead, the RSPB managed the land to support wetland species through less intensive agricultural practices and by flooding fields. The article takes a symbolic approach that focuses on the ambiguity of Loch Gruinart as both a farm and nature reserve. It is argued that this enables the reserve to be used as a metaphor of relations between conservation and farming. The article demonstrates how farmers used the reserve both to situate themselves and to claim that the reserve was not a real farm. In response, RSPB staff argued for the logic of their management and advocated education and community involvement as a means to help farmers understand their aims. Such controversies, it is argued, are a consequence of conservationists′ attempts to bring non-humans into the political arena and can thus be seen as essential to the integration of conservation into Islay rather than inimical to it.http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2009;volume=7;issue=3;spage=165;epage=175;aulast=WhitehouseanthropologycontestationfarmingIslaylandscapelocal communitiesRSPB
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Whitehouse Andrew
spellingShingle Whitehouse Andrew
′A Disgrace to a Farmer′: Conservation and Agriculture on a Nature Reserve in Islay, Scotland
Conservation & Society
anthropology
contestation
farming
Islay
landscape
local communities
RSPB
author_facet Whitehouse Andrew
author_sort Whitehouse Andrew
title ′A Disgrace to a Farmer′: Conservation and Agriculture on a Nature Reserve in Islay, Scotland
title_short ′A Disgrace to a Farmer′: Conservation and Agriculture on a Nature Reserve in Islay, Scotland
title_full ′A Disgrace to a Farmer′: Conservation and Agriculture on a Nature Reserve in Islay, Scotland
title_fullStr ′A Disgrace to a Farmer′: Conservation and Agriculture on a Nature Reserve in Islay, Scotland
title_full_unstemmed ′A Disgrace to a Farmer′: Conservation and Agriculture on a Nature Reserve in Islay, Scotland
title_sort ′a disgrace to a farmer′: conservation and agriculture on a nature reserve in islay, scotland
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Conservation & Society
issn 0972-4923
0975-3133
publishDate 2009-01-01
description This article is an investigation into contestations about the landscape of Loch Gruinart, a nature reserve managed by the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) on the Scottish island of Islay. Farmers argued that the low-lying areas of the reserve should have been farmed more intensively to support higher numbers of geese, which farmers disliked because they caused damage to their own grass crops. Instead, the RSPB managed the land to support wetland species through less intensive agricultural practices and by flooding fields. The article takes a symbolic approach that focuses on the ambiguity of Loch Gruinart as both a farm and nature reserve. It is argued that this enables the reserve to be used as a metaphor of relations between conservation and farming. The article demonstrates how farmers used the reserve both to situate themselves and to claim that the reserve was not a real farm. In response, RSPB staff argued for the logic of their management and advocated education and community involvement as a means to help farmers understand their aims. Such controversies, it is argued, are a consequence of conservationists′ attempts to bring non-humans into the political arena and can thus be seen as essential to the integration of conservation into Islay rather than inimical to it.
topic anthropology
contestation
farming
Islay
landscape
local communities
RSPB
url http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2009;volume=7;issue=3;spage=165;epage=175;aulast=Whitehouse
work_keys_str_mv AT whitehouseandrew x2032adisgracetoafarmerx2032conservationandagricultureonanaturereserveinislayscotland
_version_ 1725671730592088064