Analysis of Students' Misconducts in Higher Education using Decision Tree and ANN Algorithms

A major problem that the Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) face is the misconduct of students’ behavior. The objective of this study is to decrease these misconducts by identifying the factors which cause them on college campuses. CRISP-DM Methodology has been applied to manage the process of dat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. H. Blasi, M. Alsuwaiket
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: D. G. Pylarinos 2020-12-01
Series:Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.etasr.com/index.php/ETASR/article/view/3927
id doaj-42cb556a7e9142f890cb44424cbfa86b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-42cb556a7e9142f890cb44424cbfa86b2021-02-02T13:48:58ZengD. G. PylarinosEngineering, Technology & Applied Science Research2241-44871792-80362020-12-0110610.48084/etasr.3927Analysis of Students' Misconducts in Higher Education using Decision Tree and ANN AlgorithmsA. H. Blasi0M. Alsuwaiket1Department of Computer Information Systems, Mutah University, JordanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering Technology, Hafar Batin University, Saudi ArabiaA major problem that the Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) face is the misconduct of students’ behavior. The objective of this study is to decrease these misconducts by identifying the factors which cause them on college campuses. CRISP-DM Methodology has been applied to manage the process of data mining and two data mining techniques: J48 Decision Tree (DT) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) have been used to build classification models and to generate rules to classify and predict students' behavior and the location of misconduct in college campuses. They take into consideration seven factors: Student Major, Student Level, Gender, GPA Cumulative, Local Address, Ethnicity, and time of misconduct by month. Both techniques were evaluated and compared. The accuracy results were high for both classification models, whereas the J48 Decision Tree gave higher accuracy. http://www.etasr.com/index.php/ETASR/article/view/3927J48 decision treeartificial neural networksmachine learningstudent misconduct
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. H. Blasi
M. Alsuwaiket
spellingShingle A. H. Blasi
M. Alsuwaiket
Analysis of Students' Misconducts in Higher Education using Decision Tree and ANN Algorithms
Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research
J48 decision tree
artificial neural networks
machine learning
student misconduct
author_facet A. H. Blasi
M. Alsuwaiket
author_sort A. H. Blasi
title Analysis of Students' Misconducts in Higher Education using Decision Tree and ANN Algorithms
title_short Analysis of Students' Misconducts in Higher Education using Decision Tree and ANN Algorithms
title_full Analysis of Students' Misconducts in Higher Education using Decision Tree and ANN Algorithms
title_fullStr Analysis of Students' Misconducts in Higher Education using Decision Tree and ANN Algorithms
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Students' Misconducts in Higher Education using Decision Tree and ANN Algorithms
title_sort analysis of students' misconducts in higher education using decision tree and ann algorithms
publisher D. G. Pylarinos
series Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research
issn 2241-4487
1792-8036
publishDate 2020-12-01
description A major problem that the Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) face is the misconduct of students’ behavior. The objective of this study is to decrease these misconducts by identifying the factors which cause them on college campuses. CRISP-DM Methodology has been applied to manage the process of data mining and two data mining techniques: J48 Decision Tree (DT) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) have been used to build classification models and to generate rules to classify and predict students' behavior and the location of misconduct in college campuses. They take into consideration seven factors: Student Major, Student Level, Gender, GPA Cumulative, Local Address, Ethnicity, and time of misconduct by month. Both techniques were evaluated and compared. The accuracy results were high for both classification models, whereas the J48 Decision Tree gave higher accuracy.
topic J48 decision tree
artificial neural networks
machine learning
student misconduct
url http://www.etasr.com/index.php/ETASR/article/view/3927
work_keys_str_mv AT ahblasi analysisofstudentsmisconductsinhighereducationusingdecisiontreeandannalgorithms
AT malsuwaiket analysisofstudentsmisconductsinhighereducationusingdecisiontreeandannalgorithms
_version_ 1724293963589877760