Influence of turbulence on the drop growth in warm clouds, Part I: comparison of numerically and experimentally determined collision kernels

This study deals with the comparison of numerically and experimentally determined collision kernels of water drops in air turbulence. The numerical and experimental setups are matched as closely as possible. However, due to the individual numerical and experimental restrictions, it could not be avoi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christoph Siewert, Róbert Bordás, Ulrike Wacker, Klaus D. Beheng, Rudie P.J. Kunnen, Matthias Meinke, Wolfgang Schröder, Dominique Thévenin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Borntraeger 2014-09-01
Series:Meteorologische Zeitschrift
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2014/0566
id doaj-42c7198c59d7490c8e2f8c463ca8cf94
record_format Article
spelling doaj-42c7198c59d7490c8e2f8c463ca8cf942020-11-24T23:07:12ZengBorntraegerMeteorologische Zeitschrift0941-29482014-09-0123439741010.1127/0941-2948/2014/056684311Influence of turbulence on the drop growth in warm clouds, Part I: comparison of numerically and experimentally determined collision kernelsChristoph SiewertRóbert BordásUlrike WackerKlaus D. BehengRudie P.J. KunnenMatthias MeinkeWolfgang SchröderDominique ThéveninThis study deals with the comparison of numerically and experimentally determined collision kernels of water drops in air turbulence. The numerical and experimental setups are matched as closely as possible. However, due to the individual numerical and experimental restrictions, it could not be avoided that the turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate of the measurement and the simulations differ. Direct numerical simulations (DNS) are performed resulting in a very large database concerning geometric collision kernels with 1470 individual entries. Based on this database a fit function for the turbulent enhancement of the collision kernel is developed. In the experiments, the collision rates of large drops (radius >7.5μm$> 7.5\,\text{\textmu{}m}$) are measured. These collision rates are compared with the developed fit, evaluated at the measurement conditions. Since the total collision rates match well for all occurring dissipation rates the distribution information of the fit could be used to enhance the statistical reliability and for the first time an experimental collision kernel could be constructed. In addition to the collision rates, the drop size distributions at three consecutive streamwise positions are measured. The drop size distributions contain mainly small drops (radius <7.5μm$< 7.5\,\text{\textmu{}m}$). The measured evolution of the drop size distribution is confronted with model calculations based on the newly derived fit of the collision kernel. It turns out that the observed fast evolution of the drop size distribution can only be modeled if the collision kernel for small drops is drastically increased. A physical argument for this amplification is missing since for such small drops, neither DNSs nor experiments have been performed. For large drops, for which a good agreement of the collision rates was found in the DNS and the experiment, the time for the evolution of the spectrum in the wind tunnel is too short to draw any conclusion. Hence, the long-time evolution of the drop size distribution is presented in a submitted paper by Riechelmann et al.http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2014/0566drop collisionsturbulencecollision kernel fitdirect numerical simulationwind tunnel experimentdrop size spectrum evolution
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christoph Siewert
Róbert Bordás
Ulrike Wacker
Klaus D. Beheng
Rudie P.J. Kunnen
Matthias Meinke
Wolfgang Schröder
Dominique Thévenin
spellingShingle Christoph Siewert
Róbert Bordás
Ulrike Wacker
Klaus D. Beheng
Rudie P.J. Kunnen
Matthias Meinke
Wolfgang Schröder
Dominique Thévenin
Influence of turbulence on the drop growth in warm clouds, Part I: comparison of numerically and experimentally determined collision kernels
Meteorologische Zeitschrift
drop collisions
turbulence
collision kernel fit
direct numerical simulation
wind tunnel experiment
drop size spectrum evolution
author_facet Christoph Siewert
Róbert Bordás
Ulrike Wacker
Klaus D. Beheng
Rudie P.J. Kunnen
Matthias Meinke
Wolfgang Schröder
Dominique Thévenin
author_sort Christoph Siewert
title Influence of turbulence on the drop growth in warm clouds, Part I: comparison of numerically and experimentally determined collision kernels
title_short Influence of turbulence on the drop growth in warm clouds, Part I: comparison of numerically and experimentally determined collision kernels
title_full Influence of turbulence on the drop growth in warm clouds, Part I: comparison of numerically and experimentally determined collision kernels
title_fullStr Influence of turbulence on the drop growth in warm clouds, Part I: comparison of numerically and experimentally determined collision kernels
title_full_unstemmed Influence of turbulence on the drop growth in warm clouds, Part I: comparison of numerically and experimentally determined collision kernels
title_sort influence of turbulence on the drop growth in warm clouds, part i: comparison of numerically and experimentally determined collision kernels
publisher Borntraeger
series Meteorologische Zeitschrift
issn 0941-2948
publishDate 2014-09-01
description This study deals with the comparison of numerically and experimentally determined collision kernels of water drops in air turbulence. The numerical and experimental setups are matched as closely as possible. However, due to the individual numerical and experimental restrictions, it could not be avoided that the turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate of the measurement and the simulations differ. Direct numerical simulations (DNS) are performed resulting in a very large database concerning geometric collision kernels with 1470 individual entries. Based on this database a fit function for the turbulent enhancement of the collision kernel is developed. In the experiments, the collision rates of large drops (radius >7.5μm$> 7.5\,\text{\textmu{}m}$) are measured. These collision rates are compared with the developed fit, evaluated at the measurement conditions. Since the total collision rates match well for all occurring dissipation rates the distribution information of the fit could be used to enhance the statistical reliability and for the first time an experimental collision kernel could be constructed. In addition to the collision rates, the drop size distributions at three consecutive streamwise positions are measured. The drop size distributions contain mainly small drops (radius <7.5μm$< 7.5\,\text{\textmu{}m}$). The measured evolution of the drop size distribution is confronted with model calculations based on the newly derived fit of the collision kernel. It turns out that the observed fast evolution of the drop size distribution can only be modeled if the collision kernel for small drops is drastically increased. A physical argument for this amplification is missing since for such small drops, neither DNSs nor experiments have been performed. For large drops, for which a good agreement of the collision rates was found in the DNS and the experiment, the time for the evolution of the spectrum in the wind tunnel is too short to draw any conclusion. Hence, the long-time evolution of the drop size distribution is presented in a submitted paper by Riechelmann et al.
topic drop collisions
turbulence
collision kernel fit
direct numerical simulation
wind tunnel experiment
drop size spectrum evolution
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2014/0566
work_keys_str_mv AT christophsiewert influenceofturbulenceonthedropgrowthinwarmcloudsparticomparisonofnumericallyandexperimentallydeterminedcollisionkernels
AT robertbordas influenceofturbulenceonthedropgrowthinwarmcloudsparticomparisonofnumericallyandexperimentallydeterminedcollisionkernels
AT ulrikewacker influenceofturbulenceonthedropgrowthinwarmcloudsparticomparisonofnumericallyandexperimentallydeterminedcollisionkernels
AT klausdbeheng influenceofturbulenceonthedropgrowthinwarmcloudsparticomparisonofnumericallyandexperimentallydeterminedcollisionkernels
AT rudiepjkunnen influenceofturbulenceonthedropgrowthinwarmcloudsparticomparisonofnumericallyandexperimentallydeterminedcollisionkernels
AT matthiasmeinke influenceofturbulenceonthedropgrowthinwarmcloudsparticomparisonofnumericallyandexperimentallydeterminedcollisionkernels
AT wolfgangschroder influenceofturbulenceonthedropgrowthinwarmcloudsparticomparisonofnumericallyandexperimentallydeterminedcollisionkernels
AT dominiquethevenin influenceofturbulenceonthedropgrowthinwarmcloudsparticomparisonofnumericallyandexperimentallydeterminedcollisionkernels
_version_ 1725619491094659072