Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl on Haemodynamic Response to Patients Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Surgery: A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Study

Introduction: Dexmedetomidine, an a2 agonist, can be used as an adjuvant in general anaesthesia as it attenuates the stress response to various noxious stimuli and helps in maintaining the perioperative haemodynamic stability along with sedation and not causing any significant respiratory depres...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lovina Neil, Ashok Patel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2017-04-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/9563/24152_CE[Ra1]_F(RK)_PF1(SYGH)_PFA(RK)_PF2(P_SH).pdf
id doaj-42be724dcc094fd7afa427c312e8384d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-42be724dcc094fd7afa427c312e8384d2020-11-25T03:10:03ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2017-04-01114UC01UC0410.7860/JCDR/2017/24152.9563Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl on Haemodynamic Response to Patients Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Surgery: A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled StudyLovina Neil0Ashok Patel1Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sterling Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.Head, Department of Anaesthesia, Sterling Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.Introduction: Dexmedetomidine, an a2 agonist, can be used as an adjuvant in general anaesthesia as it attenuates the stress response to various noxious stimuli and helps in maintaining the perioperative haemodynamic stability along with sedation and not causing any significant respiratory depression in the postoperative period. Aim: To study the difference in haemodynamic responses of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients were divided into two groups of 30 each randomly. In Group F, fentanyl 0.5 μg/kg as loading dose over 10 minutes prior to induction followed by 0.2-0.7 μg/kg/hr as maintenance dose and in Group D, Dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg as loading dose over 10 minutes prior to induction followed by 0.2 μg/kg/hr-0.7 μg/kg/hr as maintenance dose till surgery was over. Haemodynamic variables and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were recorded continuously. Postoperative sedation and recovery were assessed by modified Ramsay sedation score. Results: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) fell by 9% in Group-D as compared to no fall in Group F during intubation. After intubation, 9% increase is seen in Group D v/s 19% in Group F. During the period of pneumoperitoneum upto 5 minutes post extubation, the SBP in Group D was significantly lower as compared to Group F rest duration, the difference was not significant between both groups. Heart Rate (HR) remained stable throughout the study except at laryngoscopy when it rose. Heart rate was similar in both groups at intubation, decreased by 3.51% in Group D as compare to 11.11% rise in Group F. Post intubate on, heart rate fell by 2% in Group D vs 15% rise in Group F. Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) remained higher than baseline than throughout the study. After intubation, 3% higher in Group D where as 15% in Group F increase was seen. In intraoperative period the difference between both groups was not significant. There was significant difference between two groups at 10 minutes, 45 minutes of pneumoperitoneum. End Tidal CO2 (ETCO2 ) was similar in both groups. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine is better drug as compared to fentanyl for maintaining the haemodynamic response during intubation and intraoperative period.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/9563/24152_CE[Ra1]_F(RK)_PF1(SYGH)_PFA(RK)_PF2(P_SH).pdfpneumoperitoneumramsay sedation scorestress response
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lovina Neil
Ashok Patel
spellingShingle Lovina Neil
Ashok Patel
Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl on Haemodynamic Response to Patients Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Surgery: A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Study
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
pneumoperitoneum
ramsay sedation score
stress response
author_facet Lovina Neil
Ashok Patel
author_sort Lovina Neil
title Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl on Haemodynamic Response to Patients Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Surgery: A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Study
title_short Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl on Haemodynamic Response to Patients Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Surgery: A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Study
title_full Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl on Haemodynamic Response to Patients Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Surgery: A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Study
title_fullStr Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl on Haemodynamic Response to Patients Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Surgery: A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl on Haemodynamic Response to Patients Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Surgery: A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Study
title_sort effect of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl on haemodynamic response to patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery: a double blinded randomized controlled study
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
publishDate 2017-04-01
description Introduction: Dexmedetomidine, an a2 agonist, can be used as an adjuvant in general anaesthesia as it attenuates the stress response to various noxious stimuli and helps in maintaining the perioperative haemodynamic stability along with sedation and not causing any significant respiratory depression in the postoperative period. Aim: To study the difference in haemodynamic responses of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients were divided into two groups of 30 each randomly. In Group F, fentanyl 0.5 μg/kg as loading dose over 10 minutes prior to induction followed by 0.2-0.7 μg/kg/hr as maintenance dose and in Group D, Dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg as loading dose over 10 minutes prior to induction followed by 0.2 μg/kg/hr-0.7 μg/kg/hr as maintenance dose till surgery was over. Haemodynamic variables and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were recorded continuously. Postoperative sedation and recovery were assessed by modified Ramsay sedation score. Results: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) fell by 9% in Group-D as compared to no fall in Group F during intubation. After intubation, 9% increase is seen in Group D v/s 19% in Group F. During the period of pneumoperitoneum upto 5 minutes post extubation, the SBP in Group D was significantly lower as compared to Group F rest duration, the difference was not significant between both groups. Heart Rate (HR) remained stable throughout the study except at laryngoscopy when it rose. Heart rate was similar in both groups at intubation, decreased by 3.51% in Group D as compare to 11.11% rise in Group F. Post intubate on, heart rate fell by 2% in Group D vs 15% rise in Group F. Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) remained higher than baseline than throughout the study. After intubation, 3% higher in Group D where as 15% in Group F increase was seen. In intraoperative period the difference between both groups was not significant. There was significant difference between two groups at 10 minutes, 45 minutes of pneumoperitoneum. End Tidal CO2 (ETCO2 ) was similar in both groups. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine is better drug as compared to fentanyl for maintaining the haemodynamic response during intubation and intraoperative period.
topic pneumoperitoneum
ramsay sedation score
stress response
url https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/9563/24152_CE[Ra1]_F(RK)_PF1(SYGH)_PFA(RK)_PF2(P_SH).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT lovinaneil effectofdexmedetomidineversusfentanylonhaemodynamicresponsetopatientsundergoingelectivelaparoscopicsurgeryadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT ashokpatel effectofdexmedetomidineversusfentanylonhaemodynamicresponsetopatientsundergoingelectivelaparoscopicsurgeryadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledstudy
_version_ 1724660916840038400