Pay for performance of Estonian family doctors and impact of different practice- and patient-related characteristics on a good outcome: A quantitative assessment

Background and objective: Several practice- and patient-related characteristics are reported to have an influence on a good quality outcome. Estonia started the pay-for-performance (P4P) system for family doctors (FDs) in 2006. Every year the number of FDs participating in P4P has increased, but onl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eero Merilind, Rauno Salupere, Katrin Västra, Ruth Kalda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-01-01
Series:Medicina
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010660X16300131
id doaj-42b7fbf927034cddb1469d55def9185f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-42b7fbf927034cddb1469d55def9185f2020-11-25T02:31:26ZengMDPI AGMedicina1010-660X2016-01-0152319219810.1016/j.medici.2016.04.003Pay for performance of Estonian family doctors and impact of different practice- and patient-related characteristics on a good outcome: A quantitative assessmentEero Merilind0Rauno Salupere1Katrin Västra2Ruth Kalda3Department of Family Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, EstoniaKlaster Baltic, Tartu, EstoniaEstonian Health Insurance Fund, Tallinn, EstoniaDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, EstoniaBackground and objective: Several practice- and patient-related characteristics are reported to have an influence on a good quality outcome. Estonia started the pay-for-performance (P4P) system for family doctors (FDs) in 2006. Every year the number of FDs participating in P4P has increased, but only half of the FDs achieved good outcome. The aim of this study was to find out which practice- and patient-related characteristics could have an impact on a good outcome. Materials and methods: The study was conducted using the database from the Estonian Health Insurance Fund. All working FDs were divided into two groups (with “good” and “poor” outcomes) according their achievements in P4P. We chose characteristics which described structure (practice list size, number of doctors, composition of FDs list: age, number of chronically ill patients) during the observation period 2006–2012. Results: During the observation period 2006–2012, the number of FDs with a good outcome in P4P increased from 6% (2006) to 53% (2012). The high number of FDs in primary care teams, longer experience of participation in P4P and the smaller number of patients on FDs’ lists all have an impact on a good outcome. The number of chronically ill patients in FDs lists has no significant effect on an outcome, but P4P increases the number of disease-diagnosed patients. Conclusions: Different practice and patient-related characteristics have an impact on a good outcome. As workload increases, smaller lists of FDs patients or increased staff levels are needed in order to maintain a good outcome.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010660X16300131Health care qualityOutcomePay-for-performanceFamily practice
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eero Merilind
Rauno Salupere
Katrin Västra
Ruth Kalda
spellingShingle Eero Merilind
Rauno Salupere
Katrin Västra
Ruth Kalda
Pay for performance of Estonian family doctors and impact of different practice- and patient-related characteristics on a good outcome: A quantitative assessment
Medicina
Health care quality
Outcome
Pay-for-performance
Family practice
author_facet Eero Merilind
Rauno Salupere
Katrin Västra
Ruth Kalda
author_sort Eero Merilind
title Pay for performance of Estonian family doctors and impact of different practice- and patient-related characteristics on a good outcome: A quantitative assessment
title_short Pay for performance of Estonian family doctors and impact of different practice- and patient-related characteristics on a good outcome: A quantitative assessment
title_full Pay for performance of Estonian family doctors and impact of different practice- and patient-related characteristics on a good outcome: A quantitative assessment
title_fullStr Pay for performance of Estonian family doctors and impact of different practice- and patient-related characteristics on a good outcome: A quantitative assessment
title_full_unstemmed Pay for performance of Estonian family doctors and impact of different practice- and patient-related characteristics on a good outcome: A quantitative assessment
title_sort pay for performance of estonian family doctors and impact of different practice- and patient-related characteristics on a good outcome: a quantitative assessment
publisher MDPI AG
series Medicina
issn 1010-660X
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Background and objective: Several practice- and patient-related characteristics are reported to have an influence on a good quality outcome. Estonia started the pay-for-performance (P4P) system for family doctors (FDs) in 2006. Every year the number of FDs participating in P4P has increased, but only half of the FDs achieved good outcome. The aim of this study was to find out which practice- and patient-related characteristics could have an impact on a good outcome. Materials and methods: The study was conducted using the database from the Estonian Health Insurance Fund. All working FDs were divided into two groups (with “good” and “poor” outcomes) according their achievements in P4P. We chose characteristics which described structure (practice list size, number of doctors, composition of FDs list: age, number of chronically ill patients) during the observation period 2006–2012. Results: During the observation period 2006–2012, the number of FDs with a good outcome in P4P increased from 6% (2006) to 53% (2012). The high number of FDs in primary care teams, longer experience of participation in P4P and the smaller number of patients on FDs’ lists all have an impact on a good outcome. The number of chronically ill patients in FDs lists has no significant effect on an outcome, but P4P increases the number of disease-diagnosed patients. Conclusions: Different practice and patient-related characteristics have an impact on a good outcome. As workload increases, smaller lists of FDs patients or increased staff levels are needed in order to maintain a good outcome.
topic Health care quality
Outcome
Pay-for-performance
Family practice
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010660X16300131
work_keys_str_mv AT eeromerilind payforperformanceofestonianfamilydoctorsandimpactofdifferentpracticeandpatientrelatedcharacteristicsonagoodoutcomeaquantitativeassessment
AT raunosalupere payforperformanceofestonianfamilydoctorsandimpactofdifferentpracticeandpatientrelatedcharacteristicsonagoodoutcomeaquantitativeassessment
AT katrinvastra payforperformanceofestonianfamilydoctorsandimpactofdifferentpracticeandpatientrelatedcharacteristicsonagoodoutcomeaquantitativeassessment
AT ruthkalda payforperformanceofestonianfamilydoctorsandimpactofdifferentpracticeandpatientrelatedcharacteristicsonagoodoutcomeaquantitativeassessment
_version_ 1724824551286636544