Analyzing Atrium Volume Designs for Hot and Humid Climates

The objective of this research was to determine the proper thermal comfort in an atrium design for single-floor, medium-rise, and high-rise buildings based on different proportions, placements, window opening ratios, and internal condition systems. EDSL Tas software was used for the dynamic thermal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reihaneh Aram, Halil Zafer Alibaba
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-11-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6213
id doaj-428fd99fb0634a8585aeb8a862a45edd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-428fd99fb0634a8585aeb8a862a45edd2020-11-25T02:21:23ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-11-011122621310.3390/su11226213su11226213Analyzing Atrium Volume Designs for Hot and Humid ClimatesReihaneh Aram0Halil Zafer Alibaba1Faculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Eastern Mediterranean University, 99628 Gazimagusa, Northern Cyprus, TurkeyFaculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Eastern Mediterranean University, 99628 Gazimagusa, Northern Cyprus, TurkeyThe objective of this research was to determine the proper thermal comfort in an atrium design for single-floor, medium-rise, and high-rise buildings based on different proportions, placements, window opening ratios, and internal condition systems. EDSL Tas software was used for the dynamic thermal simulation software models, and all were analyzed based on ASHRAE 55, ISO 7730, and EN 15251 standards to determine which dynamic thermal simulation models had thermal comfort in a hot and humid climate throughout the year. This research found that for naturally conditioned single-floor and medium-rise buildings, when the atrium proportion was 1/2 of the office proportion at the southeast and center atrium location, respectively, had maximum user satisfaction. When the building’s internal spaces were mechanically conditioned with a 1/3 and 1/4 atrium proportion of the office proportion in single-floor and medium-rise buildings, respectively, thermal comfort was acceptable, especially when the atrium was located in the center for single-floor and in the northeast for medium-rise buildings. However, the naturally conditioned high-rise building with a north-east atrium that was 1/4 of the office proportion and a mechanically conditioned high-rise with a center atrium 1/3 of the office proportion had the minimum dissatisfaction throughout the year.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6213atrium volumeatrium placementnaturally conditioned buildingmechanically conditioned buildinghot and humid climate
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Reihaneh Aram
Halil Zafer Alibaba
spellingShingle Reihaneh Aram
Halil Zafer Alibaba
Analyzing Atrium Volume Designs for Hot and Humid Climates
Sustainability
atrium volume
atrium placement
naturally conditioned building
mechanically conditioned building
hot and humid climate
author_facet Reihaneh Aram
Halil Zafer Alibaba
author_sort Reihaneh Aram
title Analyzing Atrium Volume Designs for Hot and Humid Climates
title_short Analyzing Atrium Volume Designs for Hot and Humid Climates
title_full Analyzing Atrium Volume Designs for Hot and Humid Climates
title_fullStr Analyzing Atrium Volume Designs for Hot and Humid Climates
title_full_unstemmed Analyzing Atrium Volume Designs for Hot and Humid Climates
title_sort analyzing atrium volume designs for hot and humid climates
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2019-11-01
description The objective of this research was to determine the proper thermal comfort in an atrium design for single-floor, medium-rise, and high-rise buildings based on different proportions, placements, window opening ratios, and internal condition systems. EDSL Tas software was used for the dynamic thermal simulation software models, and all were analyzed based on ASHRAE 55, ISO 7730, and EN 15251 standards to determine which dynamic thermal simulation models had thermal comfort in a hot and humid climate throughout the year. This research found that for naturally conditioned single-floor and medium-rise buildings, when the atrium proportion was 1/2 of the office proportion at the southeast and center atrium location, respectively, had maximum user satisfaction. When the building’s internal spaces were mechanically conditioned with a 1/3 and 1/4 atrium proportion of the office proportion in single-floor and medium-rise buildings, respectively, thermal comfort was acceptable, especially when the atrium was located in the center for single-floor and in the northeast for medium-rise buildings. However, the naturally conditioned high-rise building with a north-east atrium that was 1/4 of the office proportion and a mechanically conditioned high-rise with a center atrium 1/3 of the office proportion had the minimum dissatisfaction throughout the year.
topic atrium volume
atrium placement
naturally conditioned building
mechanically conditioned building
hot and humid climate
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6213
work_keys_str_mv AT reihaneharam analyzingatriumvolumedesignsforhotandhumidclimates
AT halilzaferalibaba analyzingatriumvolumedesignsforhotandhumidclimates
_version_ 1724866658625912832