Legal Concept and Legal Term: Specificity of the Correlation and Definitions (Based on Russian Laws)

The present research featured legal concepts and terms in legislative texts. The paper focuses on various approaches to legal concepts and terms, e.g. logical-hierarchical, definitional, structural-semantic, etc. The author proved that the concepts of legal term and legal concept are often synonymou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M. V. Batyushkina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kemerovo State University 2020-03-01
Series:Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета
Subjects:
Online Access:https://vestnik.kemsu.ru/jour/article/view/4631
id doaj-428767f25df34fdbbca03198c67b1ea9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-428767f25df34fdbbca03198c67b1ea92020-11-25T02:22:55ZengKemerovo State UniversityВестник Кемеровского государственного университета2078-89752078-89832020-03-0122120721510.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-1-207-2154134Legal Concept and Legal Term: Specificity of the Correlation and Definitions (Based on Russian Laws)M. V. Batyushkina0Legislative Assembly of the Omsk RegionThe present research featured legal concepts and terms in legislative texts. The paper focuses on various approaches to legal concepts and terms, e.g. logical-hierarchical, definitional, structural-semantic, etc. The author proved that the concepts of legal term and legal concept are often synonymous. They have the same nominative function, verbal expression, modification procedure, and variability. In addition, both terms possess legislative definitions. As a result, a legislative text can be understood in broad and narrow sense. The study touched upon the following issues: (a) the institutional functions of legislative definitions (interpretative, differentiating, legal, system-forming); (b) the location of the definition within the legislative text; (c) the main methods for constructing a legislative definition (lists, descriptions, combinations) and defective legislative definitions. The paper describes reasons for the ambiguity of legal concepts (terms) and the variability of their legislative definitions. The research was based on the texts of Russian federal and regional laws, legal dictionaries, and judicial practice. The methods included discursive, categorical, and definitional approaches, as well as induction and deduction and contextual, component, comparative analyzes. The obtained results and conclusions may be used in legislative text studies, as well as by experts in legislative and judicial discourse.https://vestnik.kemsu.ru/jour/article/view/4631legal discourselegislative textterminologysynonymdefinitionpolysemy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. V. Batyushkina
spellingShingle M. V. Batyushkina
Legal Concept and Legal Term: Specificity of the Correlation and Definitions (Based on Russian Laws)
Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета
legal discourse
legislative text
terminology
synonym
definition
polysemy
author_facet M. V. Batyushkina
author_sort M. V. Batyushkina
title Legal Concept and Legal Term: Specificity of the Correlation and Definitions (Based on Russian Laws)
title_short Legal Concept and Legal Term: Specificity of the Correlation and Definitions (Based on Russian Laws)
title_full Legal Concept and Legal Term: Specificity of the Correlation and Definitions (Based on Russian Laws)
title_fullStr Legal Concept and Legal Term: Specificity of the Correlation and Definitions (Based on Russian Laws)
title_full_unstemmed Legal Concept and Legal Term: Specificity of the Correlation and Definitions (Based on Russian Laws)
title_sort legal concept and legal term: specificity of the correlation and definitions (based on russian laws)
publisher Kemerovo State University
series Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета
issn 2078-8975
2078-8983
publishDate 2020-03-01
description The present research featured legal concepts and terms in legislative texts. The paper focuses on various approaches to legal concepts and terms, e.g. logical-hierarchical, definitional, structural-semantic, etc. The author proved that the concepts of legal term and legal concept are often synonymous. They have the same nominative function, verbal expression, modification procedure, and variability. In addition, both terms possess legislative definitions. As a result, a legislative text can be understood in broad and narrow sense. The study touched upon the following issues: (a) the institutional functions of legislative definitions (interpretative, differentiating, legal, system-forming); (b) the location of the definition within the legislative text; (c) the main methods for constructing a legislative definition (lists, descriptions, combinations) and defective legislative definitions. The paper describes reasons for the ambiguity of legal concepts (terms) and the variability of their legislative definitions. The research was based on the texts of Russian federal and regional laws, legal dictionaries, and judicial practice. The methods included discursive, categorical, and definitional approaches, as well as induction and deduction and contextual, component, comparative analyzes. The obtained results and conclusions may be used in legislative text studies, as well as by experts in legislative and judicial discourse.
topic legal discourse
legislative text
terminology
synonym
definition
polysemy
url https://vestnik.kemsu.ru/jour/article/view/4631
work_keys_str_mv AT mvbatyushkina legalconceptandlegaltermspecificityofthecorrelationanddefinitionsbasedonrussianlaws
_version_ 1724861097001877504