Intrinsic Turbulence Stabilization in a Stellarator

The magnetic surfaces of modern stellarators are characterized by complex, carefully optimized shaping and exhibit locally compressed regions of strong turbulence drive. Massively parallel computer simulations of plasma turbulence reveal, however, that stellarators also possess two intrinsic mechani...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. Xanthopoulos, G. G. Plunk, A. Zocco, P. Helander
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2016-06-01
Series:Physical Review X
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.021033
id doaj-426e27f894a54457ab2faae3b6ecd25c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-426e27f894a54457ab2faae3b6ecd25c2020-11-24T23:12:24ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review X2160-33082016-06-016202103310.1103/PhysRevX.6.021033Intrinsic Turbulence Stabilization in a StellaratorP. XanthopoulosG. G. PlunkA. ZoccoP. HelanderThe magnetic surfaces of modern stellarators are characterized by complex, carefully optimized shaping and exhibit locally compressed regions of strong turbulence drive. Massively parallel computer simulations of plasma turbulence reveal, however, that stellarators also possess two intrinsic mechanisms to mitigate the effect of this drive. In the regime where the length scale of the turbulence is very small compared to the equilibrium scale set by the variation of the magnetic field, the strongest fluctuations form narrow bandlike structures on the magnetic surfaces. Thanks to this localization, the average transport through the surface is significantly smaller than that predicted at locations of peak turbulence. This feature results in a numerically observed upshift of the onset of turbulence on the surface towards higher ion temperature gradients as compared with the prediction from the most unstable regions. In a second regime lacking scale separation, the localization is lost and the fluctuations spread out on the magnetic surface. Nonetheless, stabilization persists through the suppression of the large eddies (relative to the equilibrium scale), leading to a reduced stiffness for the heat flux dependence on the ion temperature gradient. These fundamental differences with tokamak turbulence are exemplified for the QUASAR stellarator [G. H. Neilson et al., IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 42, 489 (2014)].http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.021033
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author P. Xanthopoulos
G. G. Plunk
A. Zocco
P. Helander
spellingShingle P. Xanthopoulos
G. G. Plunk
A. Zocco
P. Helander
Intrinsic Turbulence Stabilization in a Stellarator
Physical Review X
author_facet P. Xanthopoulos
G. G. Plunk
A. Zocco
P. Helander
author_sort P. Xanthopoulos
title Intrinsic Turbulence Stabilization in a Stellarator
title_short Intrinsic Turbulence Stabilization in a Stellarator
title_full Intrinsic Turbulence Stabilization in a Stellarator
title_fullStr Intrinsic Turbulence Stabilization in a Stellarator
title_full_unstemmed Intrinsic Turbulence Stabilization in a Stellarator
title_sort intrinsic turbulence stabilization in a stellarator
publisher American Physical Society
series Physical Review X
issn 2160-3308
publishDate 2016-06-01
description The magnetic surfaces of modern stellarators are characterized by complex, carefully optimized shaping and exhibit locally compressed regions of strong turbulence drive. Massively parallel computer simulations of plasma turbulence reveal, however, that stellarators also possess two intrinsic mechanisms to mitigate the effect of this drive. In the regime where the length scale of the turbulence is very small compared to the equilibrium scale set by the variation of the magnetic field, the strongest fluctuations form narrow bandlike structures on the magnetic surfaces. Thanks to this localization, the average transport through the surface is significantly smaller than that predicted at locations of peak turbulence. This feature results in a numerically observed upshift of the onset of turbulence on the surface towards higher ion temperature gradients as compared with the prediction from the most unstable regions. In a second regime lacking scale separation, the localization is lost and the fluctuations spread out on the magnetic surface. Nonetheless, stabilization persists through the suppression of the large eddies (relative to the equilibrium scale), leading to a reduced stiffness for the heat flux dependence on the ion temperature gradient. These fundamental differences with tokamak turbulence are exemplified for the QUASAR stellarator [G. H. Neilson et al., IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 42, 489 (2014)].
url http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.021033
work_keys_str_mv AT pxanthopoulos intrinsicturbulencestabilizationinastellarator
AT ggplunk intrinsicturbulencestabilizationinastellarator
AT azocco intrinsicturbulencestabilizationinastellarator
AT phelander intrinsicturbulencestabilizationinastellarator
_version_ 1716350429021863936