Intrinsic Turbulence Stabilization in a Stellarator
The magnetic surfaces of modern stellarators are characterized by complex, carefully optimized shaping and exhibit locally compressed regions of strong turbulence drive. Massively parallel computer simulations of plasma turbulence reveal, however, that stellarators also possess two intrinsic mechani...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
American Physical Society
2016-06-01
|
Series: | Physical Review X |
Online Access: | http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.021033 |
id |
doaj-426e27f894a54457ab2faae3b6ecd25c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-426e27f894a54457ab2faae3b6ecd25c2020-11-24T23:12:24ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review X2160-33082016-06-016202103310.1103/PhysRevX.6.021033Intrinsic Turbulence Stabilization in a StellaratorP. XanthopoulosG. G. PlunkA. ZoccoP. HelanderThe magnetic surfaces of modern stellarators are characterized by complex, carefully optimized shaping and exhibit locally compressed regions of strong turbulence drive. Massively parallel computer simulations of plasma turbulence reveal, however, that stellarators also possess two intrinsic mechanisms to mitigate the effect of this drive. In the regime where the length scale of the turbulence is very small compared to the equilibrium scale set by the variation of the magnetic field, the strongest fluctuations form narrow bandlike structures on the magnetic surfaces. Thanks to this localization, the average transport through the surface is significantly smaller than that predicted at locations of peak turbulence. This feature results in a numerically observed upshift of the onset of turbulence on the surface towards higher ion temperature gradients as compared with the prediction from the most unstable regions. In a second regime lacking scale separation, the localization is lost and the fluctuations spread out on the magnetic surface. Nonetheless, stabilization persists through the suppression of the large eddies (relative to the equilibrium scale), leading to a reduced stiffness for the heat flux dependence on the ion temperature gradient. These fundamental differences with tokamak turbulence are exemplified for the QUASAR stellarator [G. H. Neilson et al., IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 42, 489 (2014)].http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.021033 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
P. Xanthopoulos G. G. Plunk A. Zocco P. Helander |
spellingShingle |
P. Xanthopoulos G. G. Plunk A. Zocco P. Helander Intrinsic Turbulence Stabilization in a Stellarator Physical Review X |
author_facet |
P. Xanthopoulos G. G. Plunk A. Zocco P. Helander |
author_sort |
P. Xanthopoulos |
title |
Intrinsic Turbulence Stabilization in a Stellarator |
title_short |
Intrinsic Turbulence Stabilization in a Stellarator |
title_full |
Intrinsic Turbulence Stabilization in a Stellarator |
title_fullStr |
Intrinsic Turbulence Stabilization in a Stellarator |
title_full_unstemmed |
Intrinsic Turbulence Stabilization in a Stellarator |
title_sort |
intrinsic turbulence stabilization in a stellarator |
publisher |
American Physical Society |
series |
Physical Review X |
issn |
2160-3308 |
publishDate |
2016-06-01 |
description |
The magnetic surfaces of modern stellarators are characterized by complex, carefully optimized shaping and exhibit locally compressed regions of strong turbulence drive. Massively parallel computer simulations of plasma turbulence reveal, however, that stellarators also possess two intrinsic mechanisms to mitigate the effect of this drive. In the regime where the length scale of the turbulence is very small compared to the equilibrium scale set by the variation of the magnetic field, the strongest fluctuations form narrow bandlike structures on the magnetic surfaces. Thanks to this localization, the average transport through the surface is significantly smaller than that predicted at locations of peak turbulence. This feature results in a numerically observed upshift of the onset of turbulence on the surface towards higher ion temperature gradients as compared with the prediction from the most unstable regions. In a second regime lacking scale separation, the localization is lost and the fluctuations spread out on the magnetic surface. Nonetheless, stabilization persists through the suppression of the large eddies (relative to the equilibrium scale), leading to a reduced stiffness for the heat flux dependence on the ion temperature gradient. These fundamental differences with tokamak turbulence are exemplified for the QUASAR stellarator [G. H. Neilson et al., IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 42, 489 (2014)]. |
url |
http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.021033 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pxanthopoulos intrinsicturbulencestabilizationinastellarator AT ggplunk intrinsicturbulencestabilizationinastellarator AT azocco intrinsicturbulencestabilizationinastellarator AT phelander intrinsicturbulencestabilizationinastellarator |
_version_ |
1716350429021863936 |