P3-23: Center/Surround Motion Interactions Measured Using a Nulling Procedure

Many direction-selective neurons have a receptive field structure that promotes suppressive interactions between center and surround regions. These interactions sculpt the overall pattern of activity among those neurons and, therefore, presumably impact perceived direction of motion. To test this co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Soo Hyun Park, Sang-Hun Lee, Randolph Blake
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2012-10-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1068/if733
id doaj-426d6abadad14c13aa7138a44a41e595
record_format Article
spelling doaj-426d6abadad14c13aa7138a44a41e5952020-11-25T03:15:36ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952012-10-01310.1068/if73310.1068_if733P3-23: Center/Surround Motion Interactions Measured Using a Nulling ProcedureSoo Hyun Park0Sang-Hun LeeRandolph BlakeSeoul National University, Korea, Vanderbilt University, USAMany direction-selective neurons have a receptive field structure that promotes suppressive interactions between center and surround regions. These interactions sculpt the overall pattern of activity among those neurons and, therefore, presumably impact perceived direction of motion. To test this conjecture, we have assessed the effect of motion signals produced by a moving stimulus on perceived motion within a neighboring region. On each trial a vertical bar (inducer) appeared at 8 eccentricity in the upper visual field, moving either leftward or rightward, and a circular shaped random dot kinematogram (test) appeared at 4 eccentricity. The test dots moved randomly except when the inducer passed nearby the test, at which time a pulse of coherent motion occurred in one of the two directions within the test. Coherence strength was adjusted by QUEST to maintain equal likelihood (point of subjective equality: PSE) of leftward and rightward reports of perceived direction during this motion pulse. The inducer caused a substantial shift in PSE: it was necessary for the test to contain 50% coherent motion in the same direction as that of the inducer to nullify the illusory motion within the test caused by the inducer. The effect of the inducer could also be offset by simultaneously presenting a second inducer moving in the opposite direction. This pattern of results implies substantial suppressive interactions between neighboring moving stimuli, interactions whose strength and direction can be assessed psychophysically using nulling procedures.https://doi.org/10.1068/if733
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Soo Hyun Park
Sang-Hun Lee
Randolph Blake
spellingShingle Soo Hyun Park
Sang-Hun Lee
Randolph Blake
P3-23: Center/Surround Motion Interactions Measured Using a Nulling Procedure
i-Perception
author_facet Soo Hyun Park
Sang-Hun Lee
Randolph Blake
author_sort Soo Hyun Park
title P3-23: Center/Surround Motion Interactions Measured Using a Nulling Procedure
title_short P3-23: Center/Surround Motion Interactions Measured Using a Nulling Procedure
title_full P3-23: Center/Surround Motion Interactions Measured Using a Nulling Procedure
title_fullStr P3-23: Center/Surround Motion Interactions Measured Using a Nulling Procedure
title_full_unstemmed P3-23: Center/Surround Motion Interactions Measured Using a Nulling Procedure
title_sort p3-23: center/surround motion interactions measured using a nulling procedure
publisher SAGE Publishing
series i-Perception
issn 2041-6695
publishDate 2012-10-01
description Many direction-selective neurons have a receptive field structure that promotes suppressive interactions between center and surround regions. These interactions sculpt the overall pattern of activity among those neurons and, therefore, presumably impact perceived direction of motion. To test this conjecture, we have assessed the effect of motion signals produced by a moving stimulus on perceived motion within a neighboring region. On each trial a vertical bar (inducer) appeared at 8 eccentricity in the upper visual field, moving either leftward or rightward, and a circular shaped random dot kinematogram (test) appeared at 4 eccentricity. The test dots moved randomly except when the inducer passed nearby the test, at which time a pulse of coherent motion occurred in one of the two directions within the test. Coherence strength was adjusted by QUEST to maintain equal likelihood (point of subjective equality: PSE) of leftward and rightward reports of perceived direction during this motion pulse. The inducer caused a substantial shift in PSE: it was necessary for the test to contain 50% coherent motion in the same direction as that of the inducer to nullify the illusory motion within the test caused by the inducer. The effect of the inducer could also be offset by simultaneously presenting a second inducer moving in the opposite direction. This pattern of results implies substantial suppressive interactions between neighboring moving stimuli, interactions whose strength and direction can be assessed psychophysically using nulling procedures.
url https://doi.org/10.1068/if733
work_keys_str_mv AT soohyunpark p323centersurroundmotioninteractionsmeasuredusinganullingprocedure
AT sanghunlee p323centersurroundmotioninteractionsmeasuredusinganullingprocedure
AT randolphblake p323centersurroundmotioninteractionsmeasuredusinganullingprocedure
_version_ 1724638578799017984