Didactic negotiations

Abstract Ludvig Holberg’s The Political Tinker (1723) is often interpreted as either politically conservative or as an apolitical, psychological satire. This paper claims we should understand this play as a highly political and educational work with subversive potential – without simplif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Trygve Svensson
Format: Article
Language:Danish
Published: Scandinavian University Press/Universitetsforlaget 2017-01-01
Series:Edda
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.idunn.no/edda/2017/03/didactic_negotiations
id doaj-425f9c0281e94109b159c017e2113b4f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-425f9c0281e94109b159c017e2113b4f2020-11-24T20:44:55ZdanScandinavian University Press/UniversitetsforlagetEdda0013-08181500-19892017-01-0110421923910.18261/issn.1500-1989-2017-03-0218948693Didactic negotiationsTrygve SvenssonAbstract Ludvig Holberg’s The Political Tinker (1723) is often interpreted as either politically conservative or as an apolitical, psychological satire. This paper claims we should understand this play as a highly political and educational work with subversive potential – without simplifying Holberg’s ideological position as an absolutist. I use Quentin Skinner to ask the question, what was Holberg doing? The answer can be found in Stephen Greenblatt’s terms: He was negotiating. I claim that these two theorists are appropriate for a rhetorical analysis of this early Enlightenment text, and that the term “negotiation” provides a richer understanding of communicative action than Skinner’s approach alone. By considering the context of the play – that is, its inspiration from rapid changes in the public sphere, and real events in Hamburg – one can see how Holberg performed authority and early rhetorical citizenship in a way that made the comedy a specific, didactic form of negotiation.https://www.idunn.no/edda/2017/03/didactic_negotiationsLudvig HolbergEarly EnlightenmentComedyRhetoricNegotiationsQuentin Skinner
collection DOAJ
language Danish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Trygve Svensson
spellingShingle Trygve Svensson
Didactic negotiations
Edda
Ludvig Holberg
Early Enlightenment
Comedy
Rhetoric
Negotiations
Quentin Skinner
author_facet Trygve Svensson
author_sort Trygve Svensson
title Didactic negotiations
title_short Didactic negotiations
title_full Didactic negotiations
title_fullStr Didactic negotiations
title_full_unstemmed Didactic negotiations
title_sort didactic negotiations
publisher Scandinavian University Press/Universitetsforlaget
series Edda
issn 0013-0818
1500-1989
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Abstract Ludvig Holberg’s The Political Tinker (1723) is often interpreted as either politically conservative or as an apolitical, psychological satire. This paper claims we should understand this play as a highly political and educational work with subversive potential – without simplifying Holberg’s ideological position as an absolutist. I use Quentin Skinner to ask the question, what was Holberg doing? The answer can be found in Stephen Greenblatt’s terms: He was negotiating. I claim that these two theorists are appropriate for a rhetorical analysis of this early Enlightenment text, and that the term “negotiation” provides a richer understanding of communicative action than Skinner’s approach alone. By considering the context of the play – that is, its inspiration from rapid changes in the public sphere, and real events in Hamburg – one can see how Holberg performed authority and early rhetorical citizenship in a way that made the comedy a specific, didactic form of negotiation.
topic Ludvig Holberg
Early Enlightenment
Comedy
Rhetoric
Negotiations
Quentin Skinner
url https://www.idunn.no/edda/2017/03/didactic_negotiations
work_keys_str_mv AT trygvesvensson didacticnegotiations
_version_ 1716816127280021504