Asia-Pacific from the perspective of the United States: an agenda where commercial and security priorities coexist
The Barack Obama cabinets (2008-2012; 2012-2016) entailed a significant shift regarding the issues considered as priorities during the former Republican administration (2000-2008). The priority of fighting against jihadist terrorism was coupled with an approach that gave more importance to diplomacy...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidad Pontificia Comillas
2017-07-01
|
Series: | Comillas Journal of International Relations |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://revistas.upcomillas.es/index.php/internationalrelations/article/view/7934 |
id |
doaj-425468a4ac3c4878a9571dfd03b3beec |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-425468a4ac3c4878a9571dfd03b3beec2020-11-24T22:09:34ZengUniversidad Pontificia ComillasComillas Journal of International Relations2386-57762017-07-0109466110.14422/cir.i09.y2017.0037513Asia-Pacific from the perspective of the United States: an agenda where commercial and security priorities coexistAlfredo Crespo Alcázar0Universidad Antonio de NebrijaThe Barack Obama cabinets (2008-2012; 2012-2016) entailed a significant shift regarding the issues considered as priorities during the former Republican administration (2000-2008). The priority of fighting against jihadist terrorism was coupled with an approach that gave more importance to diplomacy and international institutions. We should not interpret this phenomenon as the United States giving up the development of its role as a global leader. When it comes to the regional level, the main transformation constituted the new geostrategic and geopolitical importance conferred upon the Asia-Pacific region in detriment of the European Union, for instance. This was due to a variety of factors, some of which arise from the recent past (issues related to security and defense) or the present (the economic crisis that the EU could not fight effectively). The new US agenda towards the Asia-Pacific generated reactions of different nature, since some international actors reacted cautiously (China, Russia or the European Union), each of them for different motives. Nevertheless, it was positively regarded by the traditional US allies in the region (Australia, Japan and South Korea).http://revistas.upcomillas.es/index.php/internationalrelations/article/view/7934Asia PacíficoSeguridad y DefensaBarack ObamaGeorge W. BushEstrategia de Seguridad Nacionalterrorismo yihadistadiplomacia multilateralinstituciones internacionalesUnión EuropeaChinaAustralialibre comercio |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Alfredo Crespo Alcázar |
spellingShingle |
Alfredo Crespo Alcázar Asia-Pacific from the perspective of the United States: an agenda where commercial and security priorities coexist Comillas Journal of International Relations Asia Pacífico Seguridad y Defensa Barack Obama George W. Bush Estrategia de Seguridad Nacional terrorismo yihadista diplomacia multilateral instituciones internacionales Unión Europea China Australia libre comercio |
author_facet |
Alfredo Crespo Alcázar |
author_sort |
Alfredo Crespo Alcázar |
title |
Asia-Pacific from the perspective of the United States: an agenda where commercial and security priorities coexist |
title_short |
Asia-Pacific from the perspective of the United States: an agenda where commercial and security priorities coexist |
title_full |
Asia-Pacific from the perspective of the United States: an agenda where commercial and security priorities coexist |
title_fullStr |
Asia-Pacific from the perspective of the United States: an agenda where commercial and security priorities coexist |
title_full_unstemmed |
Asia-Pacific from the perspective of the United States: an agenda where commercial and security priorities coexist |
title_sort |
asia-pacific from the perspective of the united states: an agenda where commercial and security priorities coexist |
publisher |
Universidad Pontificia Comillas |
series |
Comillas Journal of International Relations |
issn |
2386-5776 |
publishDate |
2017-07-01 |
description |
The Barack Obama cabinets (2008-2012; 2012-2016) entailed a significant shift regarding the issues considered as priorities during the former Republican administration (2000-2008). The priority of fighting against jihadist terrorism was coupled with an approach that gave more importance to diplomacy and international institutions. We should not interpret this phenomenon as the United States giving up the development of its role as a global leader. When it comes to the regional level, the main transformation constituted the new geostrategic and geopolitical importance conferred upon the Asia-Pacific region in detriment of the European Union, for instance. This was due to a variety of factors, some of which arise from the recent past (issues related to security and defense) or the present (the economic crisis that the EU could not fight effectively). The new US agenda towards the Asia-Pacific generated reactions of different nature, since some international actors reacted cautiously (China, Russia or the European Union), each of them for different motives. Nevertheless, it was positively regarded by the traditional US allies in the region (Australia, Japan and South Korea). |
topic |
Asia Pacífico Seguridad y Defensa Barack Obama George W. Bush Estrategia de Seguridad Nacional terrorismo yihadista diplomacia multilateral instituciones internacionales Unión Europea China Australia libre comercio |
url |
http://revistas.upcomillas.es/index.php/internationalrelations/article/view/7934 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alfredocrespoalcazar asiapacificfromtheperspectiveoftheunitedstatesanagendawherecommercialandsecurityprioritiescoexist |
_version_ |
1725811282389499904 |