Questionable research practices may have little effect on replicability
This article examines why many studies fail to replicate statistically significant published results. We address this issue within a general statistical framework that also allows us to include various questionable research practices (QRPs) that are thought to reduce replicability. The analyses indi...
Main Authors: | Rolf Ulrich, Jeff Miller |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
2020-09-01
|
Series: | eLife |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://elifesciences.org/articles/58237 |
Similar Items
-
Flexibility in reaction time analysis: many roads to a false positive?
by: Luis Morís Fernández, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01) -
Evaluation of a Meta-Analysis of Ambient Air Quality as a Risk Factor for Asthma Exacerbation
by: Warren Kindzierski, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01) -
Peer-Review Guidelines Promoting Replicability and Transparency in Psychological Science
by: Davis, W.E, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Data from Paper “False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant”
by: Joseph P Simmons, et al.
Published: (2014-02-01) -
A tutorial on hunting statistical significance by chasing N
by: Denes Szucs
Published: (2016-09-01)