Islam as the inborn religion of mankind: the concept of fiṭra in the works of Ibn Ḥazm

This article deals with the views of Ibn Ḥazm of Cordoba (d. 456/1064) on the concept of fiṭra, which occurs in the Koran (Sura 30:30) and in a number of exegetical traditions. Ibn Ḥazm takes these texts to mean that literally everyone is born as a Muslim, including polytheists and other unbelievers...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Camilla Adang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas 2000-12-01
Series:Al-Qantara : Revista de Estudios Arabes
Online Access:http://al-qantara.revistas.csic.es/index.php/al-qantara/article/view/435
id doaj-424849375ee44a13bddfa56cbce024f5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-424849375ee44a13bddfa56cbce024f52021-05-05T07:02:21ZengConsejo Superior de Investigaciones CientíficasAl-Qantara : Revista de Estudios Arabes0211-35891988-29552000-12-0121239139110.3989/alqantara.2000.v21.i2.435416Islam as the inborn religion of mankind: the concept of fiṭra in the works of Ibn ḤazmCamilla Adang0Tel Aviv UniversityThis article deals with the views of Ibn Ḥazm of Cordoba (d. 456/1064) on the concept of fiṭra, which occurs in the Koran (Sura 30:30) and in a number of exegetical traditions. Ibn Ḥazm takes these texts to mean that literally everyone is born as a Muslim, including polytheists and other unbelievers, and that they will be considered believers until they come of age. It is at this point that they have to choose between reaffirming their covenant with God, or —if they are of non-Muslim descent— to renounce their inborn religion and stick to that of their parents. This choice will, of course, affect their fate in the afterlife. Ibn Ḥazm's belief that all children up till the age of discernment must be considered believers —and are therefore entitled to paradise should they die before that age— had certain legal implications as well, and here we can see his Ẓāhirī principles at play. Ibn Ḥazm shows a tendency to award custody of non-Muslim children to Muslims so as to avoid that they are disconnected from their inborn Islam. We see this in the case of foundlings and children of doubtful paternity. Although in general he does not require that the bodies of deceased non-Muslim children (who are after all considered believers) be handed over for Muslim burial, he does rule that a child of non-Muslim parents that has fallen into captivity be given a Muslim burial. Although at first glance, these rulings seem to confirm Goldziher's statements about Ibn Ḥazm's «personal fanaticism against followers of other religions», we also see that in his view, the damages to be paid for the miscarried foetus of a non-Muslim woman are equal to those to be awarded a Muslim woman who loses her child in this way.http://al-qantara.revistas.csic.es/index.php/al-qantara/article/view/435
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Camilla Adang
spellingShingle Camilla Adang
Islam as the inborn religion of mankind: the concept of fiṭra in the works of Ibn Ḥazm
Al-Qantara : Revista de Estudios Arabes
author_facet Camilla Adang
author_sort Camilla Adang
title Islam as the inborn religion of mankind: the concept of fiṭra in the works of Ibn Ḥazm
title_short Islam as the inborn religion of mankind: the concept of fiṭra in the works of Ibn Ḥazm
title_full Islam as the inborn religion of mankind: the concept of fiṭra in the works of Ibn Ḥazm
title_fullStr Islam as the inborn religion of mankind: the concept of fiṭra in the works of Ibn Ḥazm
title_full_unstemmed Islam as the inborn religion of mankind: the concept of fiṭra in the works of Ibn Ḥazm
title_sort islam as the inborn religion of mankind: the concept of fiṭra in the works of ibn ḥazm
publisher Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
series Al-Qantara : Revista de Estudios Arabes
issn 0211-3589
1988-2955
publishDate 2000-12-01
description This article deals with the views of Ibn Ḥazm of Cordoba (d. 456/1064) on the concept of fiṭra, which occurs in the Koran (Sura 30:30) and in a number of exegetical traditions. Ibn Ḥazm takes these texts to mean that literally everyone is born as a Muslim, including polytheists and other unbelievers, and that they will be considered believers until they come of age. It is at this point that they have to choose between reaffirming their covenant with God, or —if they are of non-Muslim descent— to renounce their inborn religion and stick to that of their parents. This choice will, of course, affect their fate in the afterlife. Ibn Ḥazm's belief that all children up till the age of discernment must be considered believers —and are therefore entitled to paradise should they die before that age— had certain legal implications as well, and here we can see his Ẓāhirī principles at play. Ibn Ḥazm shows a tendency to award custody of non-Muslim children to Muslims so as to avoid that they are disconnected from their inborn Islam. We see this in the case of foundlings and children of doubtful paternity. Although in general he does not require that the bodies of deceased non-Muslim children (who are after all considered believers) be handed over for Muslim burial, he does rule that a child of non-Muslim parents that has fallen into captivity be given a Muslim burial. Although at first glance, these rulings seem to confirm Goldziher's statements about Ibn Ḥazm's «personal fanaticism against followers of other religions», we also see that in his view, the damages to be paid for the miscarried foetus of a non-Muslim woman are equal to those to be awarded a Muslim woman who loses her child in this way.
url http://al-qantara.revistas.csic.es/index.php/al-qantara/article/view/435
work_keys_str_mv AT camillaadang islamastheinbornreligionofmankindtheconceptoffitraintheworksofibnhazm
_version_ 1721473291113201664